ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Whaling

1004 Words5 Pages

Year 9 science
Science as a Human endeavour- issues investigation
Ocean conservation
Introduction:
Should Japan cease all whaling activity? They are one the most active in their whaling activity. Some reasons are reasonable because they have claim that they are for scientific reasons but are all the whales being fished from the sea and killed all are for research. Decrease in population of whales can make the ecosystem imbalanced and can affect the other species in the ocean. Whales are special animals, they’re highly intelligent and share some human-like patterns that are complex, but their population are under endangered because of the active whaling. Should japan be allowed to continue whaling or should they stop.

Scientific information …show more content…

Phytoplankton are then consumed by the first order consumers and the chain continues on as the first order consumers are then eaten by second order consumer to where the second order consumer become the prey of the third order consumers. The producers and consumers are the both broken down by decomposers and the matter is cycled by decomposing into nutrients for plants. Energy flow of the marine ecosystem starts through phytoplankton and is transferred to the animals who eats …show more content…

Whale eating is a tradition that even occur in earliest history, dating back to 10,000 B.C, therefore there is no right to stopping a tradition that was started long ago. Whale meat is also significant to Japan’s culture because it kept the people of Japan fed during and even after the hard time of World War 2. It is an old Japanese tradition that should not be allowed to be criticised as it is people’s food culture. (Animal Planet, n.d) It is hypocritical to deny Japan from killing an animal where considering killing other animals such as kangaroos and baby cattle are okay. (Philpott, 2015) Eating whale meat isn’t for healthy or nutritional reasons, but it’s just that Japan wants to continue the country’s tradition. Japan has also stated that Minke whales have a population of 761,000 that exist in the Southern Ocean, which means that it is sustainable for commercial whaling with the support of strict management stock and annual catching limitation. (Animal Planet,

Show More
Related

Summary Of Maybe A Little More Soy

761 Words | 4 Pages

However, word leaked out that the program was for commercial purposes. The meat then would be sold, ‘in food markets or given away free or at low costs to schools and hospitals to encourage the consumption of whale meat.’ Japan

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of International Whaling

1251 Words | 6 Pages

In actuality only emotional or moral concerns are the driving force for the moratorium than any generally accepted research indicating whaling would not be sustainable if performed correctly (Marohasy,

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Protecting Traditional Fishing Villages

796 Words | 4 Pages

However, that's a fine line to be drawn because these nations already allow outside authorities to prevent them from endangered species, for example. If they already submit to outside authorities regarding other species, then it follows that they should adhere to the whaling ban too. There are many twists and turns to this because as we say that the nation should adhere to the waling ban, we are sympathetic to the local fishing villages that wish to preserve their traditional cultural ways. The exemption needs to be made to the regions that the fishing villages occupy, not the entire nation as a whole. The exemption should also stipulate that there is to be no commercial whaling in these regions.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of International Whaling

803 Words | 4 Pages

Whaling has been an activity pursued by several countries, many of them have abandoned the practice, but not Japan, Norway or Iceland. According to Marrero & Thornton (2011), humans have been whaling for thousands of years. The whales are killed not out of pleasure but to use their meat, skin, and practically all of their organs and body parts for nourishment and to provide material goods (Marrero & Thornton, 2011). The International Whaling Commission (IWC) was formed in 1946. Its mandate is two-fold: provide for the proper conservation of whale stocks and enable the orderly development of the whaling industry (International Whaling Commission, 2016).

Read More

Why Do You Think Whaling Should Not Continue No Matter Their Culture

525 Words | 3 Pages

Japan does not want us to lecture them on whaling as it apart of their culture, that cultural practices are worth preserving, regardless of the great cost to the environment. I believe that whaling should not continue no matter whose culture it is a part of. Whaling is a detective way to resource food and it should not be continued. Mr Hayshi”, the now minister of whaling programs in Japan has been stated for saying such things as “criticising whaling is a cultural attack, a kind of prejudice against Japanese culture.” He then continued on with how Japan has a long and historical tradition of whaling and that Japan is an island nation surrounded by sea, so taking some good protein form the ocean is very important.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Whaling

871 Words | 4 Pages

The Exemption for Whaling Issue 1. Do you agree with the Norwegian and Japanese position on permitting the hunting of non-endangered species of whales as a cultural exemption? My position on whaling is that it should be permitted for non-endangered species of whales. I respect the aspects of nature preservation, but judging culture and rating the life by how it disturbs emotions is favoritism.

Read More

Killing Whales Persuasive Essay

708 Words | 3 Pages

I don’t agree with the Norwegian and Japanese position on permitting the hunting of whales as a cultural exemption even though whales a are non-endangered species. I can understand the need for killing whales for food out of poverty and of lack of food supply during and right after war time, but when the economy has been restored and improved, and there are plenty of choices of other food, and yet they keep killing simply for cultural and heritage sake, it just don’t seem right to me. We, as human beings, collectively created and form our cultures through time and experiences shared, but not every part of culture and traditions are necessary for preservation. Shark fins have a long history of being a delicacy in Asian menus, especially with the Chinese, so did with the bear paws in the past (only at the banquets of the very wealthy and “privileged” people) but the world is different now, and so cultures and traditions have to evolve along with time and changes. Already, human beings pollute the marine life, cause whales and other creatures to die from eating garbage and waste that we dump into their living environment.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Whaling

336 Words | 2 Pages

(5) All the other countries have an international ban on whaling, but over 1000 whales, including

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Whaling

717 Words | 3 Pages

For this assignment I have chosen the "an exemption for whaling" as it is my very old concern about the cultural difference specially when i have faced to a documentary movie about whaling in Japan which shows a red sea from a whale blood and this documentary explained that in some areas this is the only way for a large group of people to survive, so suddenly this question popped up in my mind that which one has priority, a whale life or humans life quality. One the aspects which upset me most is that many people from developed countries which never experienced living in a undeveloped area or country have other priorities or at least concern than a person or family who straggles whit extreme poverty and hunger but during the globalization and some main streams they dictate their mind which is affected by medias and their life style. Do you agree with the Norwegian and Japanese position on

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Whaling

1085 Words | 5 Pages

It is not to ban cultural or personal preferences. For the greatest good, for the greatest number, the intergovernmental organization can protect the environment if individual countries cannot do that. So the whaling ban is not the violation of Japanese' sovereignty. 3. How should these kinds of questions about cultural exemptions be settled?

Read More

Why Is The International Whaling Commission Effective

1436 Words | 6 Pages

Abiding the international regulation system, the Convention provides protection worldwide for all species of whales from over-fishing with the participation of member nations. Even though the IWC is the main whaling authority, discrepancies arise due to Japan’s “untamed” whaling linked to “research”, causing NGO to be skeptic in the IWC’s authority. The IWC’s has given Japan the ability to kill a vast amount of

Read More

Dolphin Captivity Research Paper

666 Words | 3 Pages

On Japan’s culture is common to eat whales and dolphin meat. Japan had many festivals where they give meat of dolphin. Based on the argument that killing dolphins came from their culture and tradition Japan had been slaughtering thousands of dolphins. I think that if things keep changing we should be flexible for new ideas. Humans have evolved since the beginning of our existence, from the Stone Age to the Contemporary.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Whaling

1352 Words | 6 Pages

Whaling: a cultural activity or ecological threat? Do you agree with the Norwegian and Japanese position on permitting the hunting of non-endangered species of whales as a cultural exemption? The International Whaling Commission banned whaling for commercial purposes in 1982 (White, 2016). Many countries who used to whale for centuries have continued whaling despite this international regulation.

Read More

International Whaling Persuasive Essay

589 Words | 3 Pages

Dolphins have a much higher intelligence than other whales and should not be subjected to

Read More

Whaling Should Be Allowed

927 Words | 4 Pages

Whaling should only be exempt if its absence would decimate a culture. The law is clear, it does not say exemptions are for cultural or economic reasons (Tohlen, 2009). Thus, in adhering to the spirit of the law we must not consider any economic impacts or world opinions. Modifying a regulation due to current economics or public preferences, in my opinion, would set a dangerous precedence. Considering the globalization of the world, this could open the door for other countries to take actions on other natural resources.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Whaling

Related Topics

Open Document