ipl-logo

Protection Against Quartering Essay

583 Words3 Pages

Protection against quartering is the third Amendment in the Bill of Rights. In simplest terms, it is saying that soldiers do not have the right to take over your home to stay there, no matter what state our country is in. It addresses a time in our society when the right to our own homes, and the right to privacy were not automatically given to us. This was a time when we didn’t have any rights, and we had to earn them. Something like privacy would seem like an unalienable right, wouldn’t you think so? You’d be wrong in just assuming that. Colonists were not considered equal to actual citizens of britain, even though they were. Colonists were not represented in British government, so they got no say in anything that happened. They were treated …show more content…

It doesn’t really seem very important at first glance. During the revolutionary war however, the quartering of British soldiers in colonist’s homes was a very big problem. The whole point of the revolution was that colonists were not being given equal representation to British government, were not being treated fairly and equally in a general sense, and wanted to separate from Britain. They felt that they were being unfairly treated by the British for no apparent reason. It started with taxes on things like paper. Then when the Stamp Act was overthrown, the tea tax was put in place by the British, for no beneficial financial reason, just because they could. The colonists needed to revolt and break away, but the British refused to understand that, which is what caused them to go to war. During the war, the British were still taking advantage of the fact that they had control over the colonists. One of the ways they would show this is by quartering the colonists homes. British soldiers would come into a town and need a place to stay. So they would have complete disregard for the people who currently lived there. The British soldiers would go into colonist’s homes and treat the current residents as their servants. The soldiers would eat their food, sleep in their beds, use their dishes, and in some cases, take their possessions. This happened in almost all of the colonies

Show More
Related

Gaspee Affair Dbq

96 Words | 1 Pages

The landing of British troops in the colonies brought America closer to its revolution. In 1768, the British Navy landed 4000 soldiers in the Boston harbor in an attempt to maintain order and end smuggling operations. The soldiers, needing housing were quartered in the houses of the New England colonists according to the Mutiny Act. The colonists, who disliked with the anti-smuggling operations of the British, sunk the HMS Gaspee in an event known as the “Gaspee Affair.”

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Tea Act Of 1773

423 Words | 2 Pages

The Tea Act of 1773 reinstated the issue of Britain’s right to tax the colonies. The Parliament and the colonies disagreed on a system of government in which the colonies would share the same rights and control as Parliament over their colonial affairs. Between 1773 and 1776, enormous amounts of tension between the center and the peripheries regarding the right to control the colonies led to the disintegration of the empire. The colonies and Parliament continued their dispute about the supremacy of the colonies that began with the Stamp Act of 1765.

Read More

Apush Dbq American Revolution

1001 Words | 5 Pages

In document L “BOSTONIANS IN DISTRESS” CARTOON we can see a bunch of colonies locked up in a cell that is on the liberty tree while they are being fed by the British . The colonies feel and are being treated like slaves by the British but now they are done with them they want them out of their lives. In document N “CAPTAIN PRESTON INTERVIEW” Captain Preston uses the words “we” and “they” to differentiate between the colonist and the British saying that they have no relationship with them. Preston has put everything aside and wants nothing to do with the British after all they have done to them. Preston tells us that they wanted nothing to do with the British over how they treat the

Read More

Revolutionary War Dbq Analysis

685 Words | 3 Pages

Soon after the Seven Years’ War, the British and the colonists learned that victory came with a rather expensive price (Kennedy, Cohen, & Bailey, 2010). Great Britain tightened its grip on the colonies in North America, expecting colonists to pay for their financial struggles. In order to make colonists pay for the war, Great Britain reminded the North American colonies who had authority by controlling the colonists to submit to various ordinances ratified by British Parliament. This action only showed that arrogance leads to rebellion socially, economically, and politically. Socially, a lack of communication between Great Britain and the North American colonies was to blame for the Revolutionary War.

Read More

Boston Customs House Breaking Riot

757 Words | 4 Pages

Then it felt like they were on invisible leashes with all of these policies and restrictions, it also felt like they were a piggy bank having there coins being plucked out of them. They felt this way because England kept raising taxes and kept taking money and the colonists were boiling over the tipping point. Since the custom house has tax collectors, the scene started there and the colonists didn’t think they would do anything. This Event was so important because it showed that the Soldiers weren’t just there to stop demonstrations and keep order, but they had no guilt on

Read More

The Influence Of The Quartering Act

318 Words | 2 Pages

If the colonist’s house was too small to house all the soldiers, they had to find places for them nearby, such as Inns and stables. The colonists were confused and questioning why the British soldiers were still in North America after the French and Indian War. In 1766, 1,500 more British Soldiers sailed to the New York Harbor. The New York Colonial Assembly were very unhappy and refused to house them.

Read More

Were The American Colonists Justified In The Revolutionary War

426 Words | 2 Pages

During the Colonial Era (1492-1763), colonists were justified in waging war against Great Britain; due to the inequitable Stamp Act, the insufferable British oppression, and the perceived tyranny of King George III, the king of Great Britain, however, the colonists were unjustified in some of their actions. In Colonial America, colonists were justified in waging war against Great Britain, because the Stamp Act was unfair and viewed as punishment. Because of the war, Britain had no other choice but to tax the colonists to pay for the debt. For example, according to document 2, the author states that the act was not only for trade but for “the single purpose of levying money.”

Read More

Reasons For The Boston Massacre

232 Words | 1 Pages

The colonials were upset because of ridiculous taxing, which imposed by the British government. The colonist’s response to the situation was boycotting the goods. And so the British government dispatched thousand of troops in Boston, which created a tension between the colonists and the military. On March 5, 1770, the British troops gathered at the custom house in order to protect it. There was a strong resentment in the crowd, as they harassed the troops.

Read More

The Revolutionary War: The Boston Massacres

194 Words | 1 Pages

The Boston Massacres was a terrible event that has faults on both the colonists and the British soldier's shoulders. However, no part of this event would have happened if the colonists had not formed a riot right in front of the British soldiers. The colonists have the right to complain about their feeling on how they are treated by the king. They do not have the right harass and or threaten these British soldiers because these soldiers had done the colonists no fault. By complaining, cursing and or threatening these British soldiers is not going to change the way in which the colonies are treated.

Read More

American Revolution Dbq

1528 Words | 7 Pages

The colonists no longer considered it be a virtuous government. As Thomas Paine said, “Government is, or at least should be, designed to “supply the deflect of moral virtue”. It is evident that in the years 1774 to 1776 that British government had become corrupt and they were forcing laws upon the colonists that they did not have the authority to do. By enforcing these laws without giving the colonists proper representation in Parliament the British government had infringed on the colonist’s rights to life, liberty, and

Read More

The Significance Of The Boston Tea Party

69 Words | 1 Pages

The boston tea party occurred when colonist as a way of rebelion attack british by throwing the tea that they found in their ships. And some people wonder why they did that and historic events show that there were French Indian War before that make the colonists to have an economic crisis so they can pay for the products. And the unique product that haven’t tax was the tea.

Read More

Explain The Arguments That Support The American Revolution

580 Words | 3 Pages

One time the British passed a law that allowed the british soldiers to forcefully live in the colonists’ home! The colonies started out to benefit Great Britain, but after one war and lots of laws, the colonies were going to be part of a revolution. What was the American Revolution about? Economic Rights or Civil Liberties? On one hand the British instilled unfair regulations on trade and goods.

Read More

Why Is The Stamp Act Important To The British Government

169 Words | 1 Pages

The British government didn’t only place taxes on goods, they also imposed acts such as the Quartering Act, the Stamp Act, and the Tea Act. The Quartering Act allowed British soldiers to be housed by us. We felt that this violated our rights and privacy. This means that if a British soldier were to knock on your door and ask you if they could stay, you had to say yes. Each British soldier needed shelter.

Read More

How Did The Founding Fathers Rebel Against Britain

329 Words | 2 Pages

Colonists were expected to house soldiers in ale houses, inns and in the homes of those who sold wine. This Act also required all colonists to provide food for any British soldiers in the area. The colonists were still housing the British soldiers after the American Revolution came to a close. John Locke argued for natural rights for all, he also thought that the government had the responsibility to protect the citizens’ rights. In his opinion, the government was violating the citizens’ rights.

Read More

Stand Your Ground Law Essay

700 Words | 3 Pages

The stand your ground law is an expansion of the Castle Doctrine (a 17th-century common law that was eventually brought to the U.S.). The Castle Doctrine is a legal doctrine, that “designates a person's abode or any legally occupied place as a place in which that person has protections and immunities permitting him or her, in certain circumstances, to use force (up to and including deadly force) to defend himself or herself against an intruder, and is free from legal prosecution for the consequences of the force used” (pg.). The stand your ground law, however, was a lobbying product of the National Rifle Association (NRA) and was signed into law by Governor Jeb Bush on April 26, 2005. Florida was the first the state to enact this law, and currently, 22 states have now adopted this law.

Read More

More about Protection Against Quartering Essay

Related Topics

Open Document