ipl-logo

Racial Bias Among Jurrors

530 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Racial bias within the us judicial system

Chapter 3 Article 3: Racial Bias Among Jurors at Heart of Supreme Court Case How does the Supreme Court work and what is it made up of? These questions asked every day by some who do not have a full understanding of how the United States court system works. According to chapter three of the textbook, Constitutional Law and the Criminal Justice System by J. Scott Harr, Karen M. Hess, Christine Orthmann, and Jonathon Kingsbury the United Sates Supreme Court is the last and final word (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 59). Meaning that if the Supreme Court reaches a ruling it is set in stone and no other judicial or political person or group can overturn the decision (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 59). Nowhere in the article was it stated …show more content…

That being said, there is a very lengthy process to getting a person’s case tried before the Supreme Court. To better elaborate, the first step in bringing a case before the Supreme Court is to first have someone’s case be presented through the State or Federal court system decision (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 61). The next step is to have the case tried in a Federal Court or the States Supreme Court, after that there is a decision-making period known as the Discretionary decision, or the Mandatory decision (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 61). The final two steps are the prescreening and the decision-making conferences by the Justices (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 61). Once a legal team or case has gone though all five necessary stages, there will be a formal full judicial decision made by the

Show More
Related
1109 Words | 5 Pages

The defense argued that the peremptory strikes were based off of race. Snyder appealed to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, which found that the judge did not act unreasonably in dismissing the case as a Batson violation. This case parallels the case at hand. The prosecutor used their peremptory strikes to remove the black jurors for pretext reasons, not justifiable ones. In Foster’s case, the court used reasons such as the jurors being too close in age to the defendant, Foster, to strike a prospective juror.

Read More
424 Words | 2 Pages

The purpose behind this paper is to inform the reader about the importance and the influential outcome of the Batson V. Kentucky case. A simple overview of the case is the offender James Batson was an African American male from Kentucky. Batson was accused of burglary and receiving stolen merchandise in 1981. During the court proceedings, the judge conducted voir dire to determine the ability of the jurors and discharge the jurors that did not meet the proper qualifications. When it was the prosecutors turn to make peremptory challenges, he utilized four out of the six challenges to remove the four African Americans who were left on the jury panel.

Read More
755 Words | 4 Pages

As defined in the Meriam Webster Dictionary the words Supreme Court is the highest court of law in a country or U.S. state. Also defined in the Meriam Webster Dictionary is the words judicial review it is a constitutional doctrine that gives to a court system the power to annul legislative or executive acts which the judges declare to be unconstitutional. In the Supreme Court case of Texas v. Johnson, Gregory Lee Johnson had burned an American flag. He burned the flag because he was protesting the policies that President Ronald Reagan had enacted.

Read More
903 Words | 4 Pages

Selection of jury members for the Michael Slager case, “a former white officer shot a fleeing blacks man during a traffic stop”, will be held in Columbia (Roldáncroldan). Slager’s defense team requested that jurors be selected all throughout the state considering the “cases extensive pretrial publicity” (Roldáncroldan). This is explaining how some jurors can be bias because some parts of the state are more bias to one side than the other part is, the upcountry is less bias than the lowcountry. The jury will consist of 11 white people and one black man and they are scheduled to listen to the opening statement of Slager soon ("Jury Seated in Ex-cop's Trial for Walter Scott's Death"). This is explaining that there are more white people on the jury than there are black people and this could make the verdict bias considering that Slager is a white man and Scott was a black man.

Read More
1067 Words | 5 Pages

To correct the weakness of the judicial branch, there needs to be stability and changes need to be made for what is constitutionally right. Most of the court’s race rulings since 1970 have been five-to-four decisions. If there was one more justice that was liberal, many of the cases might’ve turned out differently (Klarman, 2013). There will be issues that continue to divide the citizens as a nation and it is ultimately the Supreme Court’s decision to be constitutional in their decision making because that is as it was intended. Good behavior and a closer look at the judges should also be

Read More
1484 Words | 6 Pages

(p. 371) This exemplifies how people on the jury wanted to believe in Simpson’s innocence and how the defense purposefully created the jury to their advantage by utilizing the bias present within the public. Regardless of claims and assumptions in opposition, one can easily see how bias for O.J.’s innocence heavily impacted the

Read More
601 Words | 3 Pages

Totenberg, Nina. " Supreme Court Hears Case on Racial Bias in Jury Deliberations. " Morning Edition, 11 Oct. 2016. Gale In Context: High School, link.gale.com/apps/doc/A473553318/SUIC?u=avon12&sid=bookmark-SUIC&xid=3112b61e. Accessed 23 Feb. 2023.

Read More
1343 Words | 6 Pages

Coker gives great evidence that supports racial injustice in the criminal justice system. She discusses on the Supreme Court’s rulings and accusations of racial preference in the system. This article is helpful because it supports my thesis on race playing a role on the system of criminal justice. Hurwitz, J., & Peffley, M. (1997). Public perceptions of race and crime: The role of racial stereotypes.

Read More
813 Words | 4 Pages

According to a poll conducted by Gallup, in just the past two decades, the percentage of people who approve of the way the Supreme Court conducts its job has declined from 62% to 40% (Supreme Court). The percentage of people who disapprove has increased from 29% to 58%. It is clear that many Americans today do not approve of the Supreme Court and its Justices. The changes in these percentages can be attributed to the widespread concern that Justices are not impartial. However, it is a fact that bias is within all of us, and we can not only blame the Justices.

Read More
1640 Words | 7 Pages

This major disparity represents the larger treatment of Black people, because the prosecution would not be so harsh unless this harsh treatment was deemed acceptable the justice system. These statistics are not random. Regardless of the circumstances of each individual case, the common theme among all of these cases are the implicit bias that target the Black population. The importance of these statistics goes beyond the statistics itself. The Court established these statistics as “valid,” but the court “insisted that evidence of conscious, racial bias in McClesky’s individual

Read More
988 Words | 4 Pages

Racism is an ongoing issue which had been taking place for centuries. Racism can take various forms, direct, indirect, individual or institutional. Institutional racism however, has been questioned frequently recently in light of criminal justice system, especially and more noticeably in the US now, where many believe the police is treating/handling black people unfairly comparing to other ethnic groups. According to Macpherson (1999) institutional racism is where organisation does not provide appropriate service due to someone’s colour, culture or ethnic origin, and can take form of racial discrimination in forms of attitudes, behaviours and processes. Macpherson developed this definition when undertaking an inquiry of Stephen Lawrence, a black child who was murdered

Read More
589 Words | 3 Pages

Does the Supreme Court Have Too Much Power? Article Three, Section One of the Constitution states that “The judical power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.”. Throughout the years, the Supreme Court has evolved significantly. According to the United States Courts, the Surpeme Court can range from having a low of 5 members to a high of 10 members, the Supreme Court plays an important role in the government today. Although the Supreme Court of Justice is at the head of the court system, the power of the Supreme Court has grown exponentially to a point where it could be considered more powerful than Congress and the power of

Read More
2042 Words | 9 Pages

There are numerous issues that deal with the American criminal justice system, but the two I found most prominant that occur on a daily basis is the abuse from police officers and clear racism shown by the American criminal justice system. To begin, racism as we know is a prejudice directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one’s own race is superior. In the criminal justice system African Americans are directly targeted and punished in a higher more aggressive way, than say someone who is caucasian and committed the same exact crime. Racism is more often than not, the motive for official misconduct. There are examples of racism from every known region in the United States, spanning across centuries from slavery to

Read More
1458 Words | 6 Pages

It is about whether the jury has a reasonable doubt about his guilt. When the first ballot is taken, 10 of his fellow jurors agree that defendant is guilty while there is only one Juror had different view that defendant is innocent. Juror No. 10 begins a racist rant. As he continues, one juror

Read More
930 Words | 4 Pages

One of the greatest challenges law enforcement are facing is providing effective policing for minority communities. Some factors that prevent minorities from gaining access to justice or being taken advantage of certain criminal justice services are language barriers, racial stereotyping, and cultural differences. Since the 30 's and 40 's, and even during the 60 's, civil rights activists damaged the police-minority relations in the United States, believing that police only interest are protecting white communities. A big explanation of why there 's a poor police-minority relations in the United States is racism on the part of the individual officers. Many minorities in the United States have continued to complain about being treated more harshly than whites and the Department of Justice believes that racial profiling and police discrimination will continue to be a big problem.

Read More

More about Racial Bias Among Jurrors

Related Topics

Open Document