ipl-logo

Rainsford's True Character In The Most Dangerous Game By Richrd Connell

572 Words3 Pages

In Dwight Lyman Moody’s quote, he states that a person’s true character is what you are in the dark. This statement suggests that one may be able to hide their true self in comfortable or favorable circumstances but when facing adversity, their true nature is exposed. This concept can be applied to literature as well. In Richrd Connell's short story "The Most Dangerous Game," the characters’ actions and decisions reveal their true character when they face life-threatening situations on an isolated island. Through analyzing the literary elements of characterization and conflict within the story, it becomes true of how Moody's quote applies to this work of literature. Throughout the story, Rainsford demonstrates a complex and evolving character …show more content…

It is a fundamental and enduring part of who we are, even in our darkest moments. Rainsford is an example of this idea as he grapples with the ethical implications of hunting other humans. As a professional big-game hunter, Rainsford’s sense of morality is initially rigid and well-defined. However, through the course of his harrowing experience on Zaroff's island, Rainsford undergoes a transformation. Moody’s quotation about character in the dark is a powerful tool for analyzing Rainsford's character in The Most Dangerous Game. Moody's quotation highlights the idea that one's true character is revealed under adverse conditions, which is particularly relevant in analyzing Rainsford's complex development throughout the story. The character, Sanger Rainsford, is a focal point in The Most Dangerous Game, and his true nature is slowly revealed through his actions in challenging situations. The idea of character development and the revelation of true character under adverse conditions is a central focus in analyzing Sanger Rainsford's character in The Most Dangerous Game. Moody's quotation underscores the idea that true character is not just a surface-level attribute but rather an enduring characteristic of an individual, which can only be illuminated in the face of challenging

Show More
Related
242 Words | 1 Pages

The main character in the Most Dangerous Game, Rainsford, endured numerous troublesome trials. The last trial he endured, in my opinion, was the hardest; giving him the chance to attack and kill Zaroff right then and there, instead choosing not to take advantage of the situation. Ultimately, he confronted and challenged him to a fair and even sword fight, the winner getting to keep Zaroff 's home while the loser was fed to the dogs. This act shows a great deal of Rainsford 's character and personality, proving to be a man of honor and fairness, with respect in this scenario. Rainsford allowed an even fight to take place, and as a result, for his actions, he won while Zaroff received what he truly deserved.

Read More
310 Words | 2 Pages

One aspect to be considered in Connell 'sThe Most Dangerous Game might be that Rainsford doesn 't just change his mind or personal philosophy about whether animals feel fear while being hunted or not. Rather, consider the possibility that Rainsford 's mind turns into thinking like a hunted animal as though he literally stops thinking like a human by the end of the story. For example, when Rainsford says, I 'm still a beast at bay, he could be expressing the fact that he doesn 't just sympathize with animals who are hunted, but he empathizes with them on a highly personal level. Is it possible that the traumatic experience of being hunted for three days could change Rainsford 's mind his whole system of thinking in his braininto making him

Read More
316 Words | 2 Pages

“I live for danger” General Zaroff says to Rainsford. When Zaroff says this, it sparks the main conflict. Most games are fun, but this game is not like most games. Rainsford is forced to play this game against Zaroff. In the Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connell, the central man vs. man conflict changes Rainsford from the hunter, to the huntee, and back to the hunter.

Read More
251 Words | 2 Pages

Have you ever read the story The Most Dangerous Game? If you haven’t, then you are in for a real treat. In “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, Sanger Rainsford is shown as intelligent, respectful, and paranoid. Rainsford is shown to be intelligent in the story when he designes a trap for Zaroff. In the story he says “not many men know how to make a Malay man-catcher” (Connell 77).

Read More
600 Words | 3 Pages

To convey the theme of competition can enhance a person’s character, Richard Connell has Rainsford succeed at the Most Dangerous Game. Rainsford shows through the big hunt growth because he knows strategies and ways to win the big hunt. The frightening event is when he has to build his traps to stay away from the General. The exciting is when he meets him back at the house and kills the General and win the Most Dangerous

Read More
659 Words | 3 Pages

Rainsford’s point of view changed and now he has insight to what the animals he hunted felt. Rainsford manages to injure Zaroff several times. At the end of the story Rainsford is forced to jump in the murky waters at the edge of the island. When the readers lose hope and we think that Rainsford is but another one of Zaroff’s victims, Rainsford reappears in Zaroff’s bedroom. They have a final battle in which Rainsford comes out victorious.

Read More
1390 Words | 6 Pages

In the story, The Most Dangerous Game, by Richard Connell, Rainsford is shown going through the struggles in the game that General Zaroff made. Through a psychoanalytic lens, we can see how the story closely relates to Connell’s experiences in World War I. (Ariffin, 5) Connell was born on October 17, 1893, in New York. Little is known about his childhood, except that he had chosen to follow his father’s footsteps into newspaper editing by the time he was 10 years old. Connell was drafted into World War I when he was 23 years old where he edited the camp newspaper and served in France for a year.

Read More
615 Words | 3 Pages

Richard Connell reveals several different attributes about his characters, Rainsford and Zaroff, in The Most Dangerous Game. Connell does this by using a literary technique called characterization which is how the author of a written work reveals character traits of the different characters in their story to their readers. Unfortunately, characterization is not that simple. For some reason, intelligent literary figures decided to divide characterization into direct and indirect characterization. Not only does Connell use characterization in his short story, The Most Dangerous Game, but he uses both kinds of characterization for two different characters.

Read More
616 Words | 3 Pages

The Most Dangerous Game In the short story, “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, the protagonist, Sanger Rainsford, and the antagonist, General Zaroff, are similar characters. Both Rainsford and Zaroff share common passions, skills and ideology. Initially, there is admiration between both characters, because Rainsford is Zaroff’s hero and Rainsford is grateful for Zaroff being welcome to him. However.

Read More
205 Words | 1 Pages

In “The Most Dangerous Game” the main character, Rainsford is set with many difficult challenges and has to have certain survival qualities in order to achieve the challenges. At the beginning of the story Rainsford has a conflict with nature itself. In the story, Rainsford falls out of the boat and has to have the quality of strength in order to fight the sea and make it to shore. “For a seemingly endless time he fought the sea.” (Connell 57)

Read More
357 Words | 2 Pages

As seen in the story "The most dangerous game," Rainsford portrayed his true character when no one was around to contribute or obstruct it. The story of "The most dangerous game," is a perfect example of Moody's quote " character is what

Read More
1072 Words | 5 Pages

–Nolan As a good illustration of a survivor, Rainsford shows an important trait of one. Rainsford has what it takes to be a survivor, that trait Rainsford has is courage. Rainsford is very brave and smart; he is able to confront his fear of things without even thinking he just does it. Clarified in the MDG packet on lines 681-682, “Rainsford hesitated. He heard the hounds then he leaped far out into the sea.”

Read More
848 Words | 4 Pages

In Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game,” Sanger Rainsford is forced to test his survival skills while he is intensely hunted by an experienced war general named General Zaroff. In this story, Rainsford exhibits some very helpful characteristics like his resourcefulness, his strategic planning, and his ability to reason. As a result of Rainsford’s questioning the validity of General Zaroff’s hunting methods, he ended up playing in the game. Although I believe Rainsford is a very helpful, interesting, and dynamic character, at the end of the story, he must give up his own personal morals to win the game.

Read More
624 Words | 3 Pages

Rainford exposes his selfishness and lack of empathy by saying, “‘Be a realist. The world is made up of two classes-the hunters and the huntees. Luckily you and I are hunters’”(2). His actions throughout the story show his cruelty too. Rainsfords profession is killing animals, and while he does

Read More
662 Words | 3 Pages

Firstly, in the story The Most Dangerous Game, Rainsford is justified in killing General Zaroff because on the island the only way to live is if the stranded people hunt or the stranded will in contrast become the ones being hunted. In the beginning of the story Rainsford is talking to Whitney about jaguars. Whitney is stating that the jaguars must feel some sort of feeling like fear or terror but in contrast Rainsford states that the jaguars have no understanding of feelings. Then Rainsford is put on a island where he symbolically represents the jaguar and General Zaroff would symbolically represent the hunter.

Read More

More about Rainsford's True Character In The Most Dangerous Game By Richrd Connell

Related Topics

Open Document