More handpicked essays just for you.
Psychological factors underlying criminal behaviour
Biological psychological and sociological reasons for crime
Biological psychological and sociological reasons for crime
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
While a few theories are not as regular, others have developed and are utilized as a part of numerous criminal reviews today. Cutting edge criminologists consolidate the most important aspects of sociology, psychology, anthropology, and biological theories to advance their comprehension of criminal behavior. Rational choice theory, psychological, biological, and strain theory are used to analyze the
The first theory I will be explaining is Rational Choice Theory. Cornish and Clarke argue that “offenders are rational people who seek to maximize their pleasure and minimize their pain.” (Cullen, 2015 pg. 438)
The information used comes from other crimes scenes, police reports, psychological evaluations, and victimology reports. When using inductive reasoning, the profiler must first start with a hypothesis, and then information is gathered to support or reject the hypothesis. This type of profiling focuses on the “typical” offender for the type of crime they committed (Bartol & Bartol,
What issues does the author cite with the view of rational decision making in relation to morality? As I looked into what the author said about rationality I learned a great deal. Rationality is used during moral judgements, but not as much as we would think. It is oftentimes very difficult to find a rational justification behind a decision.
The classical theory of crime says that people make rational choices when they commit crimes. “Individuals have the will and rationality to act according to their own will and desires. Individuals will calculate the rationality of the crime based on the benefits of the crime versus the consequences of the crime” (Robinson, 2014). This theory discuses that how people think about the negative and positive outcomes before they commit crime. Even though they realize it is not right, they still continue to commit illegal offence because they believe that what they are doing is for the greater
Following up on the third hypothesis, hypothesis four stated that federal districts with a large non-citizen population would result in longer prison terms for non-citizen offenders than districts with a much smaller non-citizen population (Wu and D’Angelo, 2014). Within the fifth hypothesis, it was suggested that prison sentences would lengthen based on four components: large racial or ethnic minorities, high crime rates, light caseload, and low average personal income (Wu and D’Angelo, 2014). The sixth and final hypothesis postulated that the outcome of hypothesis three would
Developmental theories look at how offenders start and end their criminal behaviors. All developmental theories, including the two focused on in this paper, pull from social, psychological, and biological factors to find answers. Both of these theories follow along a trajectory or pathway for offenders. Sampson and Laub’s age-graded theory has offenders following along two possible trajectories. They can either follow along the high risk trajectory or the low risk trajectory.
NCVS also underestimates incidents where victims know their offenders (Chapter 6: Measuring Crime,
The responsivity principle states that clinicians should tailor treatment delivery that will produce the most effective outcomes depending on unique needs of the client. It is important that the therapist considers each offender individually and adequately assesses their cultural, mental, and physical needs. There are several advantages (pros) and a couple disadvantages (cons) to the therapeutic approach of the RNR model. The pros of this model are that treatment intensity is matched with individual risk level, dynamic issues that are directly linked with crime, and that specific treatment is tailored to individual offenders. By matching treatment intensity to risk level, offenders receive treatment that will be most effective in meeting their therapy needs.
Third, I will explore Farrell 's critique of Hayward 's article and consider his arguments made in response to Hayward 's conclusions. Fourth, this paper will engage in its own critique of both Hayward 's and Farrell 's work and conclude with which article makes the most compelling argument. Tenets of Rational Choice Theory and Situational Crime Prevention Rational choice theory originated in the Classical School of thinking as it is based on the ideas of utilitarianism, which states that individuals make decisions that provide the greatest pleasure, as well as the ideas of free will and rational thought (Farrell and Hodgkinson, 2015). According to Farrell and
To collect data on rates of recidivism, official criminal records must be obtained from both Canada and the US. Further examination of the individual’s criminal history must be considered over a period of time. A ratio level of measurement is demonstrated by the comparison of rates of re-offense in the labelled group contrasted against the rates of re-offense in the unlabelled group. Because it is on a ratio level, the counts will begin at zero and go onward as participants reoffend. Conducting research on this phenomenon will provide more nuance into labelling theory and its effect on recidivism rates across western
New York: New York, 2002. Print. Jackson, Janet L., and Debra A. Bekerian, eds. Offender Profiling: Theory, Research and Practice.
An example of this would be if a child saw one of his peers steal something they then would be more likely to do the same. In this theory if the juvenile commits more deviant acts it would be as a result of themselves furthering their learning as to where in the labeling theory it is enforced by
The court system should acknowledge the offenders past and realize that the reasons they are committing crimes are not their free will, it is elements in their past that have caused them to act in a deviant manner. Furthermore, Cullen and Johnson (2017) agree by stating, “science has demonstrated that un-chosen individual traits (e.g., temperament, self-control, IQ) and un-chosen social circumstances (e.g., family, school, community) can be
Where external and internal factors play a part and they are fated to be a criminal. The scientific grounds are offenders and people who have not yet offended can be given help, and they can be diagnosed by experts and receive treatment needed to not offend (Cavadino, 2007
