ipl-logo

Reasons For The California Crisis 1850

161 Words1 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Analysis on the annexation of texas

The crisis arose from the request of the territory of California On December 3, 1849 , the territory of California asked to join the Union with a constitution that did not allow slavery. The question of slavery being extended into other areas made this a difficult situation because the question was never resolved from the start. In 1850 , with the support of a couple senators , Henry Clay suggested another compromise. California would be allowed to join the Union as a free state, and the rest of the land that was taken from Mexico would be divided up and slavery status would be concluded by each as they would determine slavery by having its people to decide for themselves. Although the compromise did not outlaw slavery , the idea of slave
Show More
Related
206 Words | 1 Pages

In Chapter 9 of the book “Major Problems in California History” the authors use the key term “Hollywood” which is known as the “film colony” where movie stars lived and played. The author uses the term “Hollywood” as life in a movie by stating, “The existence of “Hollywood” as a residential community proved that the kind of life depicted on the silver screen could be found in reality.” Also, the author uses the key term “Hollywood” as a glamorous version of the American Dream by stating, “Ordinary people became acquainted with the movie stars’ opulent lifestyle through stories and photographs in fan magazines. Another way the key term “Hollywood” could be considered is as a resort city also named “Hollywood” located in southeastern Florida.

Read More
328 Words | 2 Pages

The Compromise of 1850 was an effort by the United States Congress that was drafted by Henry Clay, who was both the U.S. Senator and the House Representative of Kentucky. This compromise was a series of acts passed in 1850, attempted to reconcile Northern and Southern interests to preserve the Civil War. After the start of the Mexican-American War, conflicts about whether to allow slavery in those new territories to polarized Northern and Southern of the United States raised up. Northerners were in favor the Compromise, since they thought it’s a good chance to stop slavery. On the other hand, Southerners were against it, they thought it threatened their political power because the join of territory--California would disturb the balance of 15 free states and 15 slave states.

Read More
730 Words | 3 Pages

As a result of the Compromise of 1850, which defused the quarrel between the free Northern States and the slave Southern States, the territories acquired during the Mexican-American War were determined to be free, slave, or dependent upon the principle of popular sovereignty. California was admitted as a free state, the Utah and New Mexico territories were to be determined by popular sovereignty, the Texas-New Mexico boundary was solidified, and slave trade was terminated in Washington, D.C., making it easier for the South to recover fugitive slaves (Document A). As stated by an Anonymous Georgian in “Plain Words for the North,” everything the South could ask for was embodied in the Constitution, but two provisions were necessary to the South’s success – “the recognition of slavery where the people choose it and the remedy for fugitive slaves” (Document B). The North saw popular sovereignty and the remedy of fugitive slaves as deceptive encouragement of immoral and unconstitutional activity (Document C). But, southerners viewed the North’s assumption of ownership to be unconstitutional.

Read More
941 Words | 4 Pages

Compromise of 1850 - 1850 The Compromise of 1850 admitted California as a free state, declared the remaining territory from the Mexican cession to be voted slave or free through popular sovereignty, abolished slave trade in the District of Columbia, and created the Fugitive Slave Act. The south felt cheated by the compromise as the

Read More
138 Words | 1 Pages

Congress did not really effectively address slavery. The Missouri Compromise "brought about a temporary, or brief, lull in the debate over slavery" (Textbook, 449). The debate over slavery was brief. It did not effectively address slavery. It did not end it, either.

Read More
193 Words | 1 Pages

Henry Clay came forward with he compromise of 1850. Although he held slaves himself, President Taylor opposed the extension of slavery into the territories of California and New Mexico. In 1849, California requested admission as a free state, which frightened the South because the admission of another free state into the Union would make slave-holding interests a minority in Congress. Southern Congressmen tried to block California’s admission. With the national government in gridlock, Henry Clay stepped forward in May 1850 to present a compromise, much as he had thirty years earlier when Missouri sought statehood.

Read More
499 Words | 2 Pages

Questions for Days 131-150: 1. Charles Grandison Finney was an evangelist who was a preacher who helped in religiously reviving Americans. He was the first of the professional evangelists. 2. Dorothea Dix was a crusader who supported mentally impaired people.

Read More
611 Words | 3 Pages

The cause of most political dispute around 1820-1860 was mostly about slavery. There has been division between the North and the South, though compromise had usually sufficed in calming the controversy. However, nearing 1860, political compromise appeared useless. Comprises simply postponed addressing the issue, and led to even greater issues,compromise wasn’t working politically, socially,and economically for the nation.

Read More
175 Words | 1 Pages

The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt by the U.S Congress to settle divisive issues between the North and South, including slavery expansion, apprehension in the North of fugitive slaves, and slavery in the District of Columbia. The Compromise of 1850 failed because Senator John C. Calhoun from the South and Senator William Seward from the North could not agree on what Henry Clay was putting down. Part of the compromise was to make California a slavery free state which benefits the North, and enforcing a stricter fugitive slave law which benefits the South. Both the North and South opposed what the other was benefiting from. What sparked the failure of the Compromise was the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.

Read More
1208 Words | 5 Pages

Following the Mexican-American War, the conflict of 1846 through 1848 caused by Texas gaining its independence from Mexico, opinions and actions of the American citizens and government concerning slavery drastically changed. Beginning from the wishy-washiness of the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, American ideas and values evolved - proven through the Emancipation Proclamation of 1865. Through the seventeen different presidents coming into power during the time frame of 1787 to 1865, the judgments of slavery exceptionally differed from each man in power, having a large impact on the current situation of slavery during their time in office. Following the Mexican-American war, America acquired so much new land, sprouting the debate over slavery

Read More
392 Words | 2 Pages

As the United states continued to grow in size by gaining territory from others such as Mexico who through the Treaty that ended the Mexican-American war, transferred California to the US. As American continued to grow the seemingly inevitable issue of slavery festered hostility/tensions between the North and the South as they actively continue to try and keep balance of the free to slave state ratio. In the end, the underlying issue became obvious on how the United States did not practice what they preached so vocally, and I reason this by stating America failed to govern according to its own famous principles. In efforts to do so Henry Clay proposed the Compromise of 1850 which stated four main points, 1) California would be recognized as

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

There were many important Compromises between the years of 1820 and 1860, some that worked completely and some that didn’t. In the early nineteenth century, people were good at compromising and making things work for everyone. How long did perfect compromising actually last? Slavery began to split the nation apart, causing compromising to become hard to do.

Read More
667 Words | 3 Pages

It did not outlaw slavery, nor did it stop slavery from continuing on in different forms, such as

Read More
1016 Words | 5 Pages

The compromise allowed California to enter the Union as a free state, and the territories acquired in the Mexican American War to be determined free or slave through popular sovereignty. This compromise also called for stricter enforcement of fugitive slave laws, as slaves were considered property, and under the Constitution must be returned to their owners. This created tension between Northern and Southerners, especially since the North wanted nothing to do with the institution of slavery, even if it was just returning slaves. The Southerners were also angered that slave trade was ended in Washington, for they felt it was an attempt to end slavery. The Compromise of 1850, while it prevented the war for several years, failed to accomplish significant changes.

Read More
898 Words | 4 Pages

Henry Clay’s Compromise of 1850 was one of these notable events. A compromise aims to please all sides in an argument, a goal that is often just out of reach in these situations. In September of 1850, Henry Clay proposed a series of five bills in an attempt to please both the north and south. To please to north, he proposed that the country admit California as a free state and banned the slave trade in the nation’s capital. To account for the south, he stated that the federal government had no power to regulate slave trade, he implemented popular sovereignty for the Mexican Cession, and he introduced the Fugitive Slave Law.

Read More

More about Reasons For The California Crisis 1850

Related Topics

Open Document