The cause of most political dispute around 1820-1860 was mostly about slavery. There has been division between the North and the South, though compromise had usually serve in calming the disagreement. However, nearing 1860, political compromise appeared useless. Comprises simply postponed addressing the issue, and led to even more greater issues than needed,compromise wasn’t working politically, socially,and economically for our nation.
The Compromise of 1850 was a series of five bills that were intended to delay territorial and slavery conflicts. It passed when fillmore was in presidency and the goal was to deal with slavery and to keep the north’s and south’s interests balanced. The five bills were, California entered as a free state, New Mexico and Utah were each allowed to use popular sovereignty to decide on the issue of slavery, the Republic of Texas gave up lands that it claimed in present day New Mexico and received $10 million to pay its debt to Mexico, the slave trade was abolished in D.C. but not slavery, and the fugitive slave act made any federal official who did not arrest a runaway slave liable to pay a fine. The Fugitive Slave Act was the most Conflicting part of The Compromise of 1850 and caused many abolitionist to increase the beliefs against slavery. According to Watson “This law, which authorized Southerners to recover run-away
The Big Compromises During the mid-1850’s there was this compromise called the Missouri compromise, which was something that led to temporarily ending the slave debate. Then there is the Kansas- Nebraska act. This allowed slavery in the Northern Territories. In the 1800’s there was this thing called the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850.
The Compromise of 1877 was brought to attention recently, shortly after the Presidential Election of 1876. It called to resolve the disputed 1876 presidential elections in the United States. This was supposedly a deal to make it so Rutherford Hayes, the Republican Party candidate running for president, could become president. The Democrats would also become powerful in the governments within the South. Having Hayes, when he would become president, promise to allow troops to be pulled out of the rebelling states and slave states out of the South, it would the Democrats to become just that.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act greatly increased sectional tensions, which is shown by the fact that a civil war started in Kansas between the proslavery and antislavery
The Compromise of 1850 did not give a solution to slavery, either. Henry Clay said that California should enter the union as a free state, then the rest of the states would have no limits on slavery. Also trading in Washington, D.C. would be banned. The slavery itself would not be banned. People objected against this.
By the early 1850s settlers and entrepreneurs wanted to move into the area now known as Nebraska. However, until the area was organized as a territory, settlers would not move there because they could not legally hold a claim on the land. The southern states' representatives in Congress were in no hurry to permit a Nebraska territory because the land lay north of the 36°30' parallel — where slavery had been outlawed by the Missouri Compromise of 1820. Just when things between the north and south were in an uneasy balance, Kansas and Nebraska opened fresh wounds. The person behind the Kansas-Nebraska Act was Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois.
The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt by the U.S Congress to settle divisive issues between the North and South, including slavery expansion, apprehension in the North of fugitive slaves, and slavery in the District of Columbia. The Compromise of 1850 failed because Senator John C. Calhoun from the South and Senator William Seward from the North could not agree on what Henry Clay was putting down. Part of the compromise was to make California a slavery free state which benefits the North, and enforcing a stricter fugitive slave law which benefits the South. Both the North and South opposed what the other was benefiting from. What sparked the failure of the Compromise was the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.
Many of the political events lead us into battles, like the Kansas-Nebraska Act during 1854. Senator Stephen Douglass, had thought that popular sovereignty seemed liked an excellent way to decide whether slavery would be allowed in Nebraska Territory. Douglas introduced a bill in congress on January 23, 1854 that would divide the area into two territories. Nebraska is in the north and Kansas is in the south, since the Kansas and Nebraska territory lay north of the Missouri Compromise line of 36°30’ and thereof it was legally closed to slavery. Kansas and Nebraska Act became a law in 1854.
The Civil War was a war fought between 1861 and 1865 and it was caused by multiple factors including United States expansion, failed compromises, and political party conflicts. When the United states started to grow, this forced congress to created compromises in order to keep a balance between free states and slave states. The compromises that were made eventually lead to conflict between political parties because no matter what, one party was always more powerful than the other. In the year of 1845, John O’Sullivan wrote an essay that created the idea that Americans were destined by God to expand into the west.
A compromise cannot be reached regarding the case of slavery if Congress cannot make any laws in reference to slavery. This then caused a compromise in 1860 to be quite difficult to come about compared to the compromises that had been created in the
This angered the anti-slavery party even more which called a new convention in Topeka, drafted a new constitution, and set up a separate government. This shows how the Kansas-Nebraska Bill did more harm than good and ended up divided Americans and ultimately causing more conflict between the anti-slavery party and supporters of slavery. The Kansas-Nebraska act was the first real act of violence that helped to fuel the war but it did not make it inevitable
Free and slave states were kept balanced to keep war from breaking out, but the Kansas-Nebraska Act brought on the Civil War. The Kansas-Nebraska Act split Nebraska Territory into Kansas and Nebraska, where Kansas would become a slave state and Nebraska a free state, but leaving the actual decision on slavery to the residents of the territories. Bleeding Kansas occurred because this act led to violence between pro and antislavery forces. The Kansas-Nebraska Act repealed the Missouri Comprise because “it allowed southerners to bring slaves into an area formerly closed to slavery (373)” causing northerners to feel threatened. Kansas had “both southerners and antislavery northerners began an intensive drive to recruit settlers and establish a majority there (374).”
As the nation expanded westward, the decision of whether new territories would be slave or free states became very argumentative which reflected the economic interests of both Northern industrialists and Southern plantation owners. These economic conflicts increased the separation between the North and the South which ultimately led to the outbreak of the Civil War. Next, politically, the United States faced tensions that were driven by a series of events that deepened the divide between the North and the South. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 tried to address the issue of slavery in new territories in the United States with the exception of Missouri. While reducing tensions for the moment, this compromise postponed the unavoidable conflict over slavery’s expansion.
Once again, American politicians were forced to revisit the issue of slavery and its expansion west when the United States gained vast tracts of land in the west after the end of the Mexican-American War. The issue of slavery, which had not been at the forefront of national politics, once again came to great prominence. Political factions divided and some threatened that their states would leave the Union if President Taylor brought California and New Mexico into the Union without going through the territorial phase (Shi and Tindall p. 501). As a result, the Compromise of 1850 was formed by the great compromiser Henry Clay, which ensured that both the North and South’s interests remained intact. In short, the Compromise guaranteed that California
