ipl-logo

Reasons For The Opposition Against Joining The League Of Nations

768 Words4 Pages

Ava Romina Colombo-Walzer
AP US History
Ms Rosen
02/27/2023
The Opposition Against Joining the League of Nations In the Senate After the First World War, there was a nationwide debate on whether or not to accept the Treaty of Versailles and therefore join the League of Nations, or the debate between the irreconcilables and the reservationists. The League of Nations was an organization created to support peace and promote healthy communication between countries in order to prevent widespread war. However, many US senators saw drawbacks in the idea of joining an international peace organization. The reasons why many US senators opposed the idea of joining the League of Nations were that it would be the abandonment of the Monroe Doctrine principles, …show more content…

This was seen as an issue by many senators, such as Senator Henry Cabot Lodge. Lodge shares in an address on February 28, 1919 that the abandonment of the Washington policy would lead to Europe having the right to take part in the settlement of all American questions and issues. To agree to this treaty would be to would bind ourselves to submit “every possible international dispute or difference either to the league court or to the control of the executive council of the league,” which means before taking action to work on issues as a nation, the US would have to submit their conflicts and issues to the league of nations, stopping the US from truly having control of its politics and progress. Furthermore, as stated by Senator George Norris of Nebraska to the Senate in November, 11, 1919, if the League of Nations were to include the United States, the US would “mortgage thereby the lifeblood of unborn American boys to stifle this cry and uphold the cruel aristocratic reign of greedy kings and pagan monarchs the world over”. What this means is that the League of Nations was a trap to enthrall the US in a system that would only control them and stifle the cries of freedom and liberty, while the US would have little power in affecting other world powers such as Great Britain even in cases when interference is needed for the sake of proper …show more content…

The US was struggling with issues of lynching and racism towards African-Americans, Asian-Americans, and other people of color. If each conflict and issue was to be reported to the League of Nations before action was able to be taken, then the changes in the system would not be done with the support of the American people. Senator Hiram Johnson, in his Speech from June 2, 1919, stated “You, gentlemen from the South, would resent the suggestion that a race problem of yours should be decided by nations bound to the race affected by secret treaties”, meaning that if the League of Nations chose to enact change in policy regarding race in the US, then it would be detrimental to the Southern White way of life where white-supremacy is common. If the jurisdiction is given to outside countries to affect the politics of the US, racial conflicts and factions would

Show More
Related

How Did Us Foreign Policy Changes Between 1920 And 1941

595 Words | 3 Pages

In 1920, Candidate Warren G. Harding accords a speech about why he opposes joining the League of Nation. Harding also included in his speech that he rejected obligation and how it will threaten America sovereignty (Doc A). Because the public opposes joining the League of Nation, there was no country powerful enough to force Japan to accept by the Kellogg-Briand pact. The Kellogg-Briand pact formally declared aggressive war, banning the use of war as a tool of national policy except only using it for

Read More

Comparing US Society In The 1920s And The 1950s

1659 Words | 7 Pages

Isolationists advocated against foreign entanglements - thus the U.S did not join the League of Nations (which essentially ended the first world war). Even though the main goal of the League was to maintain world peace , the US was too paranoid to get involved. This paranoia also caused the United States to limit immigration through a series of acts. . Americans felt that the abundance of immigrants would be problematic because it would take away jobs from the returning soldiers. Organizations such as the KKK did not support immigration.

Read More

Treaty Of Versailles Dbq Essay

397 Words | 2 Pages

Because of that point, American senators were iffy about ratifying the treaty. They saw the League of Nations as a trap. Basically America would be pulled into all kinds of wars even if they were not the ones directly attacked. If America had decided to ratify it, all of the Americans would be at risk because who is to say a nation not in the

Read More

Treaty Of Versailles Dbq Essay

1011 Words | 5 Pages

It also stated the main factors as to why the League was built. By joining the league, nations committed themselves to reduce arguments and to comply with international law. By establishing a bond of solidarity between members, they created a system of security. Meaning, if an aggressor chose to impose on one of the Member States, it should be considered an aggressor against all of the Member States.

Read More

Why Were The Federalists Opposed The Louisiana Purchase

200 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalists opposed the Louisiana Purchase because it was a going to weaken the country and the central government, put the country in debt, also in that territory they had slavery something they were against. The Federalists opposed the Louisiana purchase for many reasons. The most important one was the fact that Louisiana had

Read More

Us Foreign Policy Changes Between 1920 And 1941 Essay

843 Words | 4 Pages

The reasons did United States foreign policy change between 1920 and 1941 was mainly because of World War II. In the 1920’s, historians have considered the United States to be an isolationist country. Presidential candidate Warren G. Harding said that he opposed the League because it does not correspond with our constitution, even saying it would be a “deadly blow at our constitutional integrity”

Read More

Significance Of World War 2 Canada

751 Words | 4 Pages

During the first world war, there was little support to the league and it resulted in world war two. However, after the war 50 counties have met up to discuss and prevent war to this

Read More

To What Extent Was The Us Justified In World War One Dbq Essay

635 Words | 3 Pages

If this attempt is unsuccessful, we propose an alliance with Mexico.” this information is found in document H. the reason the US would have to join the war for this is because they felt personally attacked by the germans saying to mexico that is the united states decided to join the war and no longer be neutral that they would attack the areas closest to them distracting the military which in turn Mexico would regain all of the land they lost in the spanish American war. To show that the United States would not be disrespected, they joined the war after a threat was introduced. Earlier in the beginning of the war before the Us became an Allied power President Woodrow Wilson wrote a letter to the congressmen saying that being neutral was the best option due to America being a “place drawn from many nations, and chiefly from the nations now at war “. He also realized that if we went to war and had to choose a side to defend it would cause the United states to fall apart due to the citizens having different opinions on the war, and what should be done; this information was found on the document

Read More

The Federalists Opposed The Louisiana Purchase

209 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalists opposed the Louisiana Purchase because of practical reasons. It increased conflict with American Indians. The Louisiana Purchase was also opposed because of the constitutionality. It was opposed because of the political balance in the new territory. Hamilton states “the territory is not yet populated”.

Read More

Long Term Effects Of The Spanish American War After The War And Modern Day?

1329 Words | 6 Pages

Some people agreed and others not so much, with the idea of America becoming a country who would take part in imperialism such as how other European countries were doing so. The people that did not agree with America going through with this then created a type of league which was a group formed to battle the idea on colonizing other countries. This league was named the American Anti-Imperialist League. The overall goal for this group was to help make America realize what type of country they were and how they fought for the same reasons that the Philippines were then fighting for. That America had fought for Independence themselves away from being controlled by a monarchy, why deprive the Philippines from having the same opportunity in creating their own government.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The League Of Nations

1726 Words | 7 Pages

President Woodrow Wilson established America’s goal for joining World War I as “making the world safe for democracy.” At the conclusion of the War, President Wilson declared fourteen principles for peace to be used during the Paris Peace Conference, called the Fourteen Points. The most important of these points was the final point: a general association of nations with the guarantees of political and territorial independence and security. As the Peace Conference progressed, more nations ratified the Treaty of Versailles and joined the League of Nations, the embodiment of President Wilson’s fourteenth point. However, Senate the United States, from President Wilson’s own country, did not ratify the treaty.

Read More

Impact Of Woodrow Wilson's Presidency

810 Words | 4 Pages

His program was an idealistic plan for peace promoting open diplomacy to remove cause for conflict, deal with territorial integrity and endorsed an international peace keeping organisation: The League of Nations. Although the Fourteen Points were imposed on the Treaty of Versailles that ultimately failed it became an important part of the idealistic ideas in Americas Foreign Policy during the 20th Century. The idea behind the League of Nations, which was also unsuccessful, has prevailed, having a lasting impact on modern day society in the United

Read More

How Was Woodrow Wilson Responsible For The League Of Nations

1333 Words | 6 Pages

Was Woodrow Wilson responsible for the failure of the US to join the League of Nations? In 1919, President Woodrow Wilson signed the Treaty of Versailles which contained the League of nations, known as the League covenant. In order for the United States to join the League of Nations, the treaty had to be passed. However, despite Wilson’s support for the League of Nations, the United States did not join because of conflicting ideals between the Senate and the President.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of World Peace

1969 Words | 8 Pages

The League of Nations set a precedent with a ‘Western-Oriented’ Security Council whose policy of requiring unanimous decisions made it near impossible for decisions to get across or the

Read More

Successes And Failures Of The League Of Nations

1369 Words | 6 Pages

The League of Nations was an international organization created 1919 by the American president, Woodrow Wilson, as a part of his Fourteen Points. The League was meant to maintain universal peace and resolve international disputes between nations to avoid a repeat of the First World War. The League of Nations had some successes in maintaining universal peace, however, there numerous failures as well. Some of the successes include the Åland Islands crisis and the Upper Silesia incident. Some of the failures of the League include the events that took place in Manchuria and Abyssinia.

Read More

More about Reasons For The Opposition Against Joining The League Of Nations

Related Topics

Open Document