Reconstruction Vs Radical Reconstruction Essay

It is inevitable to talk about reconstruction without mention the civil war era. I personally believe that if the civil war did not happen, there would not be a reconstruction era nevertheless, equal right issues would still play a huge part on today's society. The civil war was not totally about slavery, but two parties fighting to lead the congress and consequently have more power, union and confederacy. Moreover, the reconstruction time was one of the most important era in the United State of America history. I believe the radical reconstruction was more challenging for the southerners to fulfil compared to the presidential reconstruction. When Andrew Johnson assumed the president after Lincoln being assassinated, which was convenient for the southerners. The white southerners did not accept the fact that slaves would be set free and would

While the Presidential Reconstruction benefited white southerners. The polices created by the President Johnson, in certain manner empowered the white southerners, it was only designed to favor the white supremacy. On the other hand, the Radical Reconstruction was more efficient for African American. The Radicals played very important role during the reconstruction era as well as in the during the ratification of thirteen amendment, which set free all African American. The fourteen amendments, which provides all African-American born in the U.S territory the right to be considered American citizen. For instance, according to the article "Congregational Reconstruction, " found on the Digital History: congregational republicans denied representatives from the former Confederate States their seats, passed the Civil rights Act of 1866, as well as wrote the fourteen amendments to the constitution. This amendment reduced the presentation in congress of any southerner state that deprived African Americans of the