Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on the stamp act
Essay on the stamp act
The effects of the stamp act on the colonies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the year 1765 the Stamp Act was passed, a tax stating that any paper object, including cards, documents, newspapers, and not limited to a will, this act sent a stir through the colonies and caused lots of mayhem. In protest, the colonists did many things in a haze of anger and hatred, here are some. The first thing I am going to highlight is the fact that the colonists were beyond mad, to the point to where the local paper refused to buy the stamps from the British (no paper = angry colonists) this caused more people to hate the Stamp Act and England. After this the colonists boycotted all goods from the British goods angering the merchants, taking a hit at the economy. After all of this the colonists raided lawyers offices and burned
In 1765, the Stamp Act was placed on colonists, which placed a tax on many types of printed materials. As a result of the sudden tax placement, almost all of the free colonists were furious and began to riot. Groups such as the Loyal Nine opposed the Stamp Act and expressed their anger through violence. English colonists were determined to have freedom since they believed that the Stamp Act imposed by Great Britain “violated their liberty” (Foner, 179). The determination to achieve colonial liberty established a huge divide between the colonists and Great Britain.
Separately, these acts did not cause the American revolution but together the acts created tension between the American colonists and England. The Stamp act started to build the tension between the colonists and England because it was the first tax directly imposed onto the colonists. They saw this as unfair because during the French and Indian war the colonist were ignored and then suddenly they were expected to pay off Britain’s war debt. The Stamp Act led to the Declaratory Act which led to many other laws given by King George the III and Parliament because of the backlash received from the colonists. The Boston tea party was an effect of the Tea Act enacted on the American colonists.
The colonists opposed the writs of assistance because it invaded their property and their privacy, and they opposed the vice- admiralty courts because it didn’t give them their right to a jury. Because it didn’t actually represent them even though the British said otherwise. The repeated boycotts and protests eventually took a toll on British merchants and they told Parliament to repeal the Stamp Act, which they eventually did.
All the taxation took its toll on the economic status between the colonists and Britain. Prior to the French and Indian War, the Wool, Hat, and Iron Acts forced Americans to ship materials to Britain to be built, but then later buying the products from them. However mercantilism was soon abandoned when the colonists decided to fight back. The Stamp Act enraged many of the elite colonists, and as Benjamin Franklin states, they wanted to "get it repeal'd" as soon as possible. They chose to boycott, and they chose not to import or consume the product Britain wanted them to, thus the relationship economically between the two places was significantly
Colonial America and Great Britain had a rocky relationship. Some colonists liked the British authority over America. Many disliked the way the crown treated the colonies. Many colonists boycotted British products to protest against Great Britain’s rule. The many acts Britain put on to the colonists justified the boycotting of British products.
This made the colonist upset because they wanted nothing to do with the British soldiers and the colonist was not fond of them living in their house. They also wanted the colonist to fund the money needed to feed and house the soldiers, and they refused to do so. The Stamp Act, which Parliament passed in 1765 was the one that caused the most disruption of them all. The Stamp Act made the colonies angry because they had to use stamped paper for all official documents such as diplomas, marriage licenses, wills, newspapers and playing cards. The stamp showed these words embedded in the paper; the taxes had to be paid on this document.
The way the colonists reacted to the Stamp Acts is that they boycotted British goods. King George III reacted by repealing the Stamp Act and put the Declaratory Act in to that same day. The Declaratory Act is a law that stated that Parliament had the right to tax the colonies
, Britain also implemented the Stamp Act, which required the purchase of tax stamps to be attached to all printed goods. Due to the large amount of printed goods in the colonies, the total cost of these stamps was monumental, causing widespread protests, boycott of British goods, and the assembly of the Stamp Act Congress. Delegates of nine colonies met in New York as the Stamp Act Congress in order to prepare a Declaration of Rights along with a list of grievances. However, Parliament ignored these notions and continued to implement more acts on the colonies, one of these acts being the Quartering Act, which required the colonies to quarter, or provide food and lodging for British soldiers. Many colonists refused to follow this act due to
As a result of this tax, colonists in Boston rioted and destroyed the house of the stamp distributor. News of the protests spread and inspired other colonies to protest. As the taxes angered more of the colonists, they began to boycott all British goods. Boycotting of British goods and ending trade with the colonists would greatly hurt the economy in Britain. When the colonists started to boycott, Britain's economy was not strong enough to sustain itself without trade with the colonies.
This surprised the British government. The colonists even threatened tax collects forcing them to quit their jobs or to even leave the colonies. Protests spread into the streets and groups like the Sons of Liberty encouraged the colonists to boycott British products. These boycotts soon hurt British businesses in the colonies. The British government was forced to repeal the Stamp Act.
I am Dylan Timms and this is my essay called A Colonial Family’s Reaction to the Stamp Act. “I cannot believe that they just enforced this new law that we will have to pay tax on our everyday things.” my father said angrily. “You are right about that statement,” my mother said, “It just doesn’t make sense that they would tax their own people of the colonies.” Everyone stopped talking, there was only silence.
From the Stamp Act of 1765 until the Treaty of Paris in 1783, colonists from thirteen small colonies fought for independence from British Parliament and its authority they imposed upon the colonists. This change for a political revolution to remove British control of absolute sovereignty led to the establishment of a nation that become the United States of America. Tensions were already in place between the colonists and the British, and grew even more when British Parliament placed taxes upon the colonists, creating laws that controlled colonial liberties. Colonial protests and rejection began with the Boston Tea Party in 1773, followed by Coercive Acts, and in response, colonists created their own alternative government known as the First
The Stamp Act was one of the thirteen events that lead up to the Revolutionary War. The Stamp Act was enforced by Parliament that required printed materials to be on stamped paper, which had an embossed revenue stamp, and was passed on March 22, 1765. After the Sugar Act in 1764, Parliament announced that when the Sugar Act was passed they would also consider a stamp tax in the colonies. Although opposition to this possible tax from the colonies was coming soon, there was barely expectation in Britain, either by members of Parliament or American agents in Britain like Benjamin Franklin, the intensity of the protest that the tax would evolve. The reason why Parliament enforced the Stamp Act is because it had been a successful method within Great
Tonight, a warm summer night in 1765, I was sitting down with my family for dinner. News had spread around that there was a recent act passed by the motherland, called The Stamp Act. “I find this... odd, that 's all.” I spoke to my wife, Mary, looking to my dinner in front of me. “You know, this... “Stamp Act” being passed.”