Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on the stamp act
Which was NOT a consequence of the 1765 Stamp Act
Essay on the stamp act
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on the stamp act
Which was NOT a consequence of the 1765 Stamp Act
Essay on the stamp act
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The way the colonists reacted to the Stamp Acts is that they boycotted British goods. King George III reacted by repealing the Stamp Act and put the Declaratory Act in to that same day. The Declaratory Act is a law that stated that Parliament had the right to tax the colonies
The Stamp Act of 1765 had a huge negative impact on Colonial Families. The Stamp Act was a tax passed by the British Parliament that required all colonists to pay a tax on any and every printed piece of paper they used. Some of the printed documents included newspapers, magazines, pamphlets, almanacs, legal documents, licenses, bills, and playing cards. This meant that all of these items were to have a stamp placed on them to show payment of tax. The stamps could only be purchased with hard currency which was gold and silver.
All across the 13 colonies, colonists began to protest the new British taxes. They organized boycotts and participated in town hall meetings. Some colonists even dumped tar and feathers on British tax collectors. The colonists greatly objected to the Stamp Act. In 1765, representatives from 9 out of the 13 colonies met at a special meeting known as the Stamp Act Congress.
The Sugar and Stamp Acts were enacted by the British government in an attempt to raise funds to pay off massive debts acquired from the Seven Years war. At the end of the Seven Years war in 1763, the British national debt had doubled and led British politicians to find an alternate source of revenue. The Sugar Act of 1764 lowered the import tax on French molasses, making it more feasible for shippers to pay the import taxes. The act also stiffened the penalty for smuggling and allowed British naval crews to board any suspicious ship and act as customs officials. These measures were meant to deter smugglers and boost import tax revenue.
The stamp act taxed even the littlest of things such as newspapers, documents, licenses, molasses and even playing cards. It angered the colonists, so they responded with violence.
The Patriots did everything in their power to slowly cut the ties off from the British government and the British crown. The Stamp Act threw the colonists over the edge. The colonists reaction was both violent and destructive, but their point was made. John Adams said that “ The people, even to the lowest Ranks, have become more attentive to their Liberties, more inquisitive about them, and more determined to defend them.” (John Adams, Diary, 18 December 1765).
Until Parliament revoked the Stamp Act merchants all over the colonies decided to boycott British imports. This avoidance was the first main collaborative effort among the colonies. By pursuing to inflict unison on the colonies before dealing with them separately as in the past, Parliament had unintentionally united America. Taxes imposed on the American colonists triggered conflict and bitterness towards Britain. Resentment for the Stamp Act, a required charge on every printed material the colonists used, was the initial crisis of the revolutionary era and the primary division between colonists and Great Britain over liberty.
A war had just ended between the French and the British. Although they won, Britain was suppressed. The King used the colonies to regain money, supplies, and numbers. Not only were soldiers allowed to take colonist’s houses and food, but the colonies were forced to pay tax on all paper goods. That extra tax, called the Stamp Act, started a rebellion in the colonies.
It was about last year in 1765, when this story took place. I was sitting in a Tea shop with my family. All I heard the whole morning was people talking about the Stamp Act and that was about to be enforced on us. No sooner that about a week later they did apply the Stamp Act tous. The Stamp Act was passed on February 17, approved by the House of Lords on March 8th.
The purpose of British policy in the Colonies in North America had started in 1700. This policy aimed the consolidation of the colonies, or plantations, the limit of law… as called profit from the colonies. In the mid to late 1600s, Great Britain approved a lot of positive activities such as when the ships to transport goods from colonies need go through Great Britain first. It will make the Great Britain become one of the countries in the world. Some of the law of goods was passed, on the other hand, the production of good made in the colonies was limited.
Imagine this. BOOM! Your father comes home and slams the door shut. Your mom rushes to your father’s side as he stomps angrily toward the table. As he shoves off your mother’s hand, you can smell the stench of alcohol cloud over your head.
“The Stamp Act was passed by the British parliament on March 22, 1765(history.org, 2015.)” Things are only going to get worse, I thought. I was right. Things got a lot worse. There were many riots , protests and lots of violence.
This angered the colonists and they began to boycott purchasing taxed items. The stamp act was repealed on March 18, 1766. The British government began placing new taxes on the colonists such as the Sugar Act and the Currency
The Stamp Act was passed by the British Parliament on March 22, 1765. The new tax was forced on all American colonists and required them to pay a tax on every piece of printed paper they used. More details The second cause of the American Revolution was the Boston Massacre it occurred on March 5, 1770 when British soldiers in Boston opened fire on a group of American colonists killing five men. Before the Boston Massacre the British had instituted a number of new taxes on the American colonies. More details
Tyranny may occur in many forms of government. It is not limited to a single person or a group of people. Tyranny may be separated into two forms: tyranny of the individual and tyranny of the majority. Although both are detrimental, I believe that tyranny of the majority can be more socially destructive than that of an individual. Whenever the authority exceeds the power given to him by law he may be overthrown.