Throughout the essay “Learning to be Gendered”, the authors study the way children are automatically assigned to gender roles from the minute of birth, to which the child must forever act accordingly to in societies eye. Gender role development plays a large role throughout human development, most children’s gender is equivalent with their biological sex, however that may not always be the case. Society fail’s to realize the difference between gender identity and the biological sex, it is up to the child to determine their gender identity as they mature. The main argument of this article is that children are automatically assigned gender roles from the moment there sex is revealed. As a child matures he/she will approach areas associated to …show more content…
Little things like pink is for girls and blue is for boys help’s back up the main argument on how things are automatically assigned to people based on their gender roles. On page 738 it states, “In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, Anne Fausto-Sterling reports, blue was favored for girls and bright pink for boys”. Society has a negative effect on the early stages of child development, instead of accepting a person to be free of his/her decisions they basically force the people of the society to appear in a way which society finds acceptable based on gender. I agree with the article and believe that it is up to the child to determine his/her gender, an example from real life that can support my argument is nurses. While yes the