Ps, Elizabeth Gibson and Gerding Speare, allege excessive force and false arrest. Apartment # 510: P Gibson alleges that was on the toilet when MOS break into the bathroom with their guns drawn and pulled her off the toilet. P Gibson states that she was not allowed to get dressed and was dragged into the living room. P Gibson claims she was handcuffed tightly. Apartment # 406: P Speare alleges that she was in her bed when MOS entered the bedroom and dragged her into the living room.
Name of Case: LaChance vs. Erickson Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court Parties and their roles:. LaChance, director, Office of Personnel Management petitioner; Erickson et al Responded Relevant facts: Federal employees made false statements to agency investigators with respect to their misbehavior. The legal issue(s) raised: The legal issue raised was that the respondents, federal employees were charged by their agencies because each of them made false statements to the agency investigators with respect to their misconduct.
Williamson v. City of Houston, 148 F. 3d 462, Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit (1998) Facts: Linda Williamson worked as a police officer in a specialized division in the Houston Police Department. Williamson alleged a coworker, Doug McLeod, engaged in harassing behavior that created a hostile work environment for eighteen months. McLeod continued the harassing behavior after she told him it was offensive and to stop. Williamson reported McLeod’s harassment to their supervisor, Sergeant Bozeman.
On 09/29/2015 at 3:18 PM SC received call from Marguerite Pa’s niece who reported that Pa has identified two girls Gabby and Yajaira he wants to be his aide but the agency told them his service were terminated. SC attempted to explain why the service was interrupted and next step; SC end call with Marguerite. SC then called Vital Support and briefly explained to receptionist and requested to speak with a manager. SC was transferred to Vitaliya at Vital Support Nurse manger. Vitaliya stated that the termination date is incorrect and service was provided to Pa beyond termination date and that SC need to change the dates so that they can receive payment.
/1/2016 (SFC Raymond Harris): SGT Heather Saturday Tax Preparer NCO with USAREUR HHBN HSC Company email OIG HOTLINE requesting for assistance. SGT Saturday stated she has a serious issue to dicuss and needed guidance on re-enlistment. SGT Saturday tried to re-enlist and commander denied her re-enlistment and needed advice on her situation. 3/1/2016 (SFC Raymond Harris): Email SGT Saturday to acknowledge that OIG received her email and to contact OIG.
However, the case was later dismissed because the District Attorney advised Dossey that the consent by Mrs. Sibley appeared to be coerced and thus the firearm had to be suppressed. FINDINGS REGARDING CORPORAL JESUS GARCIA: ALLEGATION #1: 319.3.2 - SUPERVISOR RESPONSIBILITIES: Failure to be reasonably aware of the performance of their subordinates or to provide appropriate guidance and control.
Situation/ Task: Tarr, on Tuesday 01/23/2018, you were scheduled to work 3:00p.m.-11:00 p.m. You were seen parking your car in Gate House driveway. You parked your car and ran into Gate House to punch and walked back out to moved your car. Parking your car in any of our driveways to clocked in is a violation of our time management policy and it is falsification of timecard. Action Taken: It was discussed with Tarr on 01/23/18, the importance of following the time management and falsifying timecard.
Hap went to the City to use a dozer to doze off the pile the contractor left on the airport, the City Administrator told him they do not loan equipment, they could enter into an agreement but that would need council approval. Hap got upset, went into the Library and had a conversation with the Mayor ( not sure how heated as another department employee went outside as he was embarrassed with how Hap was acting),the Mayor came outside from that conversation and told our employee she felt threatened by what happened in the library. Hap went to the office and told the employees “ if they assisted the City in any way they would be sent home for the day or terminated. ( got an answer that said sent home, the other said terminated, I believe the terminated). When did this happen?
Throughout the contract, if a contractor of subcontractor is found to be involved in aggravated or will violation of the overtime hours and pay requirements can be deemed as ineligible for a period of not to exceed 3 years. Janik’s had employees complaining about not receiving payment for overtime hours works on the projects. On May 9, 1983, the Wage and Hour Division notified Janik of the findings and advised that they would be debarred from future federally-sponsored work. May 25, 1983, Janik appealed and requested an administrative hearing. The formers employees testified about the hours being documented on the timecards submitted were greater than what was being reflected on each individual’s timecard and that strengthen the case against Janik.
1) No. Sergeant Rick was in the right when he referred Officer Johnson for discipline. Although there may have been an alternative route. The Sergeant was very torn between letting Johnson go or doing what he was trained to do and discipline him in the correct manner. I believe he should have gone to his supervisor the lieutenant and ask for guidance or even an older supervisor that has been in his role.
When her supervisor was informed of the complaint, he suspended White without pay for insubordination in connection with an incident with
Hi Professor Feldman, In deontological ethics, I believed that the Sheriff was not acting ethical. The duty of the Sheriff and employers is to ensure that their employees are treated fairly based on the employment laws, the professional codes of conduct and moral values. The Sheriff took advantage of the employees by not providing the 5% raise. Based on virtue ethics, I think the Sheriff and lieutenant is failing since he or she is not doing anything to ensure that the employee is treated fairly.
A. I that I truly don’t understand how or why they would say that I change my story. I would like to stress I did not change my story. I the morning of Wednesday, December 23, 2015 I went to Major Trevino’s office and ask for the sign-in sheets to allow me to put in my scheduled time for December 13 through the 26 in ATAAPS. Later while I was on the computer trying to attend to my Workers Comp Major unsettling issues; Major Trevino came to me and asked for me
Why I love my Tanker Boots: Paul Caswell The time frame was August 2013. The day started out like any other day in Afghanistan hot, dry almost unbearable for life in the desert. I was the EWO (Electronic Warfare Officer) for my company. I started my day like all the rest prepping all the Vehicle counter warfare systems and personnel systems for the company mission’s.
I couldn’t help but to stray off from doing work and googling what had just happened. Trying to get information. What are the next steps? Requirements for this Deferred Action were posted a day later. Simple things
