ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay On Crime And Punishment

1420 Words6 Pages

INTRODUCTION

Crime and punishment grip the public imagination. The media regularly bombards us with the latest news on crime statistics while our air waves are saturated by pundits debating how crimes should be punished. Moreover, crime and punishment affect us. Today, approximately seven million Americans are either in prison or on probation or parole. Nearly 60 million Americans have criminal record. This is almost 30 percent of the U.S adult population. It is then, easy to understand the increasing importance of crime and punishment to citizens and politicians alike. Some have even suggested that the penal system is in a state of crisis.
The question of this paper is that ‘how should we punish crimes and different theories of punishment- …show more content…

Retributivists claim that criminals deserve punishment in proportion to their crime. Retributivists give desert a central place but only to a latter sense of desert as a demerit, or what we might call retributivist desert. Someone is thought to have desert not merely on the account of his committing a wrongful act, but on the account of his committing illegal act. There are many actions that are wrong, but not punishable because they are not illegal act. Retributivism punishes criminals for the wrongful act they performed; retributivism is backward looking. We do not punish a criminal for what they will do tomorrow, but for what they have already done. Retributivist finds consequences irrelevant. Retributivist want to know what someone deserves by looking back the act one has …show more content…

PREVENTIVE THEORY
Preventive philosophy of punishment is based on the preposition ‘not to avenge crime but to prevent crime’. It presupposes that need of punishment of crime arises simply out of social necessities. In punishing a criminal the community protects itself against anti- social act which endanger social order in general or person or property of its members. The real object of the penal law therefore, is to make the threat generally known rather than putting it occasionally into execution.
It suggests that prisonisation is the best mode of crime prevention as it seeks to eliminate offenders from society thus disabling them for repeating crime. The supporters of preventive philosophy recognize imprisonment as the best mode of punishments because it serves as an effective, deterrent and useful preventive measure. It pre-supposes some kind of physical restraint on offenders. According to supporters of this theory, murderers are hanged not merely to deter others from meeting similar end, but to eliminate such dreadful offenders from

Show More
Related
1997 Words | 8 Pages

While many opponents argue the economics of the issue, they fail to acknowledge that the main goals of punishment are to correct behavior that is deviant from the law and to prevent similar incidences from occurring. Without capital punishment, the culprits would not have to confront the potential of death, meaning that the marginal cost of violent crime would be diminished. Therefore, capital punishment is an effective method to deter

Read More
663 Words | 3 Pages

As we know, there are many ways criminals can be punished. When sentencing happens, the defendant is usually sentenced to the following punishments, listed from minor to extreme: Fines Community service Diversion programs Probation GPS monitoring Jail Prison Death penalty (Rio Salado, 2022). Most of these punishments can be listed under either the utilitarian or retributive theory of punishment. The utilitarian theory seeks to punish offenders to 'deter' future wrongdoings.

Read More
434 Words | 2 Pages

Should the death penalty be used to punish violent criminals? Attention Getter: "Capital state punishment turns the state into murders. " A quote that was said by Rev. Jesse L. Jackson which shows his disapproval for capital punishments. SP: I am going to convince you why the death penalty should not be used to punish violent criminals. Thesis:

Read More
1145 Words | 5 Pages

Deterrence and the Death Penalty: The Views of the Experts. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 87(1), 1. doi:10.2307/1143970 This article was written by Michael L. Radelet and Ronald L. Akers. They both consulted experts on criminology and criminal behaviour to evaluate the effectiveness of the Death Penalty.

Read More
1485 Words | 6 Pages

The retribution part is to punish the person for the crime that they permitted against society, and the incapacitation part is to remove that person out of society so they do no further harm. Deterrence means the prevention of future crime, and the rehabilitation teaches life skills and in the betterment. However, author Sandiford says that instead of solving crime, mass incarceration has infected our communities and striking them with devastating symptoms, and prison costs have skyrocketed, inmates ' families have been torn apart, and the system is overwhelmingly stratified by race and class (Sandiford,

Read More
351 Words | 2 Pages

One of the most controversial issues today for wise-men is how to eliminate a misdeed since sentencing criminals into the prison has no positive effect as a vast majority of hooligans tend to commit even more crimes afterwards. I am for the idea that each individual must be punished upon their behavior for that reason I believe with some practical steps it is possible to persuade trouble makers to stop damaging the environment and society. As after obtaining some carefree life in jail two third of bandits are willing to continue their illegal actions by pointing out that staying in penitentiary is more comfortable and peaceful than trying to endure real-life difficulties since they have neither communal expenses nor any responsibilities even

Read More
662 Words | 3 Pages

Some people even refer to it as the other death penalty because these offenders will never live free again. In this paper I plan to look at my opinion of the life without the possibility of parole argument. I do not believe life without parole should be a sentence that is handed out often. I do understand that there are some people that will never be able to be

Read More
1479 Words | 6 Pages

Today our justice system has a multitude of options when dealing with those who are convicted of offenses. However, many argue that retributive justice is the only real justice there is. This is mainly because its advantage is that it gives criminals the appropriate punishment that they deserve. The goals of this approach are clear and direct. In his book The Little Book of Restorative Justice, Zehr Howard (2002), illustrates that the central focus of retributive justice is offenders getting what they deserve (p. 30).

Read More
1489 Words | 6 Pages

Literature Review Criminal justice today: The Court System and the Drug Offenders in the 21st Century Beckett (2000), found new perceptions of supporting methods that involves influences relating opinions of the public, associated with crime problems, the main argument is, not increasing occurrence of criminal behavior, that has led to the main topic discussion on crimes and punishments within American today as it relates to concerns of social issue that has reached record level currently, and opinions from the public displaying possibilities on providing their support to punitive policy, such as the death penalty, three strike law, and sentencing laws, final result would be outstanding examples on how interdisciplinary research can or will

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

In the criminal justice system, the corrections component is also responsible for the rehabilitation of the convicted individual. It is their duty to attempt to make the defendant a productive member of society once again. Based on the individual’s behavior while incarcerated, the court and corrections officials may decide to place them on parole, which ensures that the individual will comply with the rules of society once they are fully released from the system. The criminal justice system is an essential role in the organizational structure of not only the United States but also in countries around the world. If there were no criminal justice system to administer punishment, the world would be unstructured, disorganized, unjustified, cruel, and not to mention a chaotic place for it citizens.

Read More
977 Words | 4 Pages

Recidivism refers to the repetition of criminal behavior (James, 2011). According to the United States Bureau of Justice 2010 statistics report, three-quarters of released prisoners are constantly rearrested for new crimes and more than half of these go back to prison in a period of two to three years after their release. Ex- inmates account for an approximated 19 percent of all arrests (Phelps, 2013, p.55). Criminals who return to the community are also most of the times worse off after a period of confinement than when they entered. It is attributable to the fact that these inmates learn antisocial and criminal attitudes from other

Read More
2091 Words | 9 Pages

Batley (2005) stated that restorative justice is about restoring, healing and re- integrating victims, offenders, as well as the society and also preventing further harm. In this assignment, I will be discussing approaches to restorative justice and illustrating their advantages and disadvantages to offending. I will also provide the applications of these five approaches of restorative justice which are retributive approach, utilitarian deterrence approach, rehabilitation approach, restitution approach and restorative approach in the given case study. I will then explain my preferred approach to justice through identifying a personal belief or value that underpins my choice.

Read More
607 Words | 3 Pages

Behind this reasoning, if an individual had committed a murder, that person’s punishment should ultimately be death itself. Both Pojman and van den Haag truly believe that retributivism helps protect our social order, and helps by eliminating the chances of vigilante justice. All guilty individuals deserve to be punished in proportion to the severity of their crime they had committed. This states that real justice requires people to suffer for their own wrongdoings, and to suffer in a way that is appropriate for the crime. For example, if murders are sentenced to death and are executed, potential murders will double think before killing another for the fear of losing their own lives.

Read More
1048 Words | 5 Pages

In the case of the death penalty, it has the added bonus in guaranteeing that the person would not offend again. Supporters of harsh punishments argue that the would-be criminal would consider the costs versus the benefits of committing a crime. If the costs outweigh the benefits, then it is assumed that he would stop what he is doing, effectively ‘deterred’. Furthermore, the usage of harsh punishments to effectively deter crime is ethically justified as it prevents more people from falling victim to crime. However it is extremely difficult to judge a punishment’s effectiveness based on its deterrence effect, consequently we must consider other variables that would entail a person to commit a crime.

Read More
1158 Words | 5 Pages

There are two main theories which advocate punishment for the sake of punishment, and place their emphasis on the purpose of prisons as deterrence rather than

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay On Crime And Punishment

Related Topics

Open Document