ipl-logo

Review Of Martin Luther King's Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence

923 Words4 Pages

Beyond Vietnam — A Time to Break Silence
Since the days the black people boarded on the new land, they have for generations been struggling to get rid of the bondage and discrimination. In a sense the black struggle for freedom started as soon as the blacks were sold to the land of America. It became widespread during 1950s and 1960s. Martin Luther King, Jr. Was one of the most influential leaders of the Civil Rights Movement in the United States during the 1950s and 1960s. During the Civil Rights Movement, King captured the attention of the nation with his philosophy and commitment to the method of nonviolent resistance. According to Dr. King, nonviolence was the only solution to the society's evil. His nonviolent approach to social reform and political activism is characterized by mass marches and large gatherings designed to demonstrate both the widespread acceptance of the tenets of civil rights and the barbarism of those opposed them. It was King's philosophy of nonviolence that made the Civil Rights Movement successful and progressive. Thus it is necessary to investigate King's philosophy of nonviolence, especially the major influences on his conversion to militant nonviolence.

Generally speaking, King did not accept nonviolence by accident. In the thesis the author presents four major specific influences …show more content…

When King first takes his position against the war in Vietnam, almost every newspaper in the country criticizes him, including both whites and Negroes. His opposition to the war lost him the confidence of White House and brought him conflict with other civil rights leader. It is a hard time for him in his life, but he never stops opposing the War and insists on peaceful negotiation and nonviolent method. Eventually history proved that King was right in his firm determination to oppose the war and America was finally forced to stop the

Show More
Related
1001 Words | 5 Pages

Even today, it is still possible to learn from King’s teachings. Non-violence is the number one thing he stood for, and that is exactly what could be used in today’s country. "Nonviolence does not seek to defeat or humiliate the opponent but to win friendship and understanding," King teaches. "The nonviolent resister must often express his protest through noncooperation or boycotts, but

Read More
822 Words | 4 Pages

And, to argue that King 's most radical days were never fulfilled; that his next campaign was to confront the president over the Vietnam War and economic disparity, “a direct confrontation with a president over an immoral war” state Hill and Wang from the book review. Although a limitation is that in almost every book about Martin Luther King including this one, only describe King’s successes and not all the failures. This occurs because the authors do not want to portray a bad image about a good man, but it is very important for us to know these failures so that we can learn and not have to understand why King did specific things, plus this topic is one of the most important events in U.S. history that’s why we need to know exactly what happened especially its when its going to remembered for many years to

Read More
1626 Words | 7 Pages

It is a weapon unique in history, which cuts without wounding and ennobles the man who wields it. It is a sword that heals. Both a practical and a moral answer to the Negro’s cry for justice, nonviolent direct action proved that it could win victories without losing wars, and so became the triumphant tactic of the Negro Revolution of 1963” (12). I believe that this paragraph is a perfect way to summarize what King discusses in his book. He emphasized the importance of nonviolence and his belief on it.

Read More
407 Words | 2 Pages

By alluding to King—a civil rights leader and a strong believer in nonviolence—Chavez shows that nonviolence can be amazingly effective. King led a nonviolent campaign during the civil rights movement geared toward ending segregation and securing equal rights for African Americans. King successfully utilized

Read More
1525 Words | 7 Pages

But, as the South Vietnamese were fighting for their liberation from a communist regime and the Americans were not, the Americans could not provide the Vietnamese with the will to win. Seeing as their efforts in Vietnam were not as effective as had been hoped for, America began to lose support for the war as tensions at home increased. “It is like sending a lion to halt an epidemic of jungle rot,” [Doc E]. The lions that were being sent, as many of the time recognized, were often minorities and oppressed people. Martin Luther King, a popular civil rights activist, said, “We were taking the black young men who had been crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in southwest Georgia and East Harlem,” [Doc C].

Read More
504 Words | 3 Pages

King believed in the power of love, nonviolence, and reconciliation as means to bring about social change. He championed integration, equality, and voting rights, utilizing strategies like boycotts, sit-ins, and marches to challenge segregation and systemic racism. King's approach aimed to appeal to the conscience of the nation and gain sympathy and support for the cause. Black critics of King's nonviolent tactics, such as Malcolm X and the Black Power movement, argued that nonviolence was ineffective in the face of systemic racism and violence directed at the Black community.

Read More
1112 Words | 5 Pages

By organizing the boycott and leading the nonviolent resistance against segregated buses, Dr. King embodied the principles of the social contract, asserting that every citizen should enjoy the same rights and privileges, regardless of race. This section provides a deep analysis of Dr. King's unwavering commitment to nonviolent resistance as a powerful tool for social and political change. By consistently advocating for peaceful means to achieve racial equality, he emphasized the persuasive and critical aspects of his philosophy. His unwavering belief in nonviolence aligned with the social contract's emphasis on peaceful democratic processes as the path to

Read More
741 Words | 3 Pages

During the late 1950s and 1960s the southern states in America were segregated. Black and white people were separated from bathrooms to schools and therefore, blacks had to use their installments or they would be punished by whites. While this was happening, two African American men, Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X, wanted segregation to come to an end. So they proclaimed their ideas and started to form groups to protest against segregation in America. Consequently, Martin Luther King Jr’s civil rights philosophy made the most sense during the 1960s because integrated schools was the goal, nonviolence could have a huge impact on the enemy and nonviolence was the only practical strategy.

Read More
736 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout the first paragraph of King’s speech, he used emotional diction with words such as struggle, poverty, and poor to prove that the war in Vietnam was bringing down the American’s and their families fighting overseas. King proved this partly with the quote, “America would never invest the necessary funds… in the rehabilitation of its poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued…” (King, Beyond, 9). King was establishing his point that America was more troubled about healing and adjusting other countries, but would never invest the same in their own country. He was in the process of proving that it wasn 't a money issue in America, but an equality issue.

Read More
1477 Words | 6 Pages

The nonviolent action that King advocates for is virtually without drawbacks, and such action has the potential to be successful in reaching the goals of its actors. That is why I am in support of King’s views on action, and why I believe that the nonviolent approach and all that comes with it is best. The kind of success that is able to be reached through non-violent action is the same kind of success reached by King's civil rights

Read More
2399 Words | 10 Pages

In order to further prove that nonviolence is the way to stop racism and gain equality, Dr. King writes: “I'm grateful to God that, through the Negro church, the dimension of nonviolence entered our struggle. If this philosophy had not emerged, I am convinced that by now many streets of the South would be flowing with floods of blood” (). In this quote, Dr. King once again argues that non violence and peace are the best ways to stop the cycle of violence. The phrase “the dimension of nonviolence entered our struggle” shows that even though they are struggling, nonviolence can help them.

Read More
552 Words | 3 Pages

After successfully pushing for the Civil Rights Act, King continued to fight for justice. He criticized the U.S.’s role in the Vietnam War. He argued that the reason the United States was in Vietnam was “to occupy it as an American colony.” In his speech, Beyond Vietnam—A Time to Break the Silence, he connected the war with economic justice. He told the public that the money that was supposed to be used to lessen poverty in the Americas had instead been used to pay for the war.

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

King’s third paragraph is his final reason, as he states in the first sentence. His third reason for protesting the war is his morals. His claim is that morally he cannot stand by with the violence that is being used, when he wants everything he does to be nonviolent. When he tells followers not to use violence they ask “what about Vietnam? They ask if our own nation wasn’t using massive doses of violence to solve its problems” (Paragraph 3).

Read More
233 Words | 1 Pages

In his speech "Beyond Vietnam - A Time to Break Silence", Martin Luther King Jr. wants the listeners to think of American involvement in the Vietnam war as terrible. The author uses emotional appeal, figures of speech, and a creative literacy to convince the audience of his viewpoint. King begins by showing the devastating effects of the Vietnam war on the people in poverty. "It seemed as if there was a real promise of hope for the poor... Then came the build up in Vietnam, and I watched this program broken and eviscerated".

Read More
1004 Words | 5 Pages

Martin Luther King Jr. disagreed with the way the war was being handled, and thought nonviolent demonstrations would be more efficient. In his speech, “Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence” Martin Luther King Jr., uses appeals to emotion, appeals to credibility, and powerful diction to strengthen his argument and persuade his audience that the Vietnam War is unjust. First, Martin Luther King Jr. uses emotional appeals to persuade his audience that the Vietnam War is unjust because it is unfairly killing the poor and its destroying the country. King uses emotional words and descriptions to capture the audience’s attention and convey the injustices caused by the Vietnam War.

Read More

More about Review Of Martin Luther King's Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence

Related Topics

Open Document