Richie and his friends all enter the war as young and naive teenagers, but quickly lose their innocence as the true horrors of war become apparent. One fact that I learned from the book is that a war is one of the most inhumane and devastating event that could ever take place. Previously, my knowledge on wars was limited to descriptions such as bad and really bad. However now, I understand how gruesome and grim war really is from the eyes of Richie. His vivid and terrifying descriptions helped me see that war shouldn’t be viewed with nonchalance, because some of the most unimaginable things have happened there.
We begin to recognise the change of character, from before the war, and after, and how such events can alter the characteristics of each group member with ease, this is the price of war being explained as the novel continues. The change from other-reliant, more civilised people, to leaders and cooperative identities is drastic, and ideas or other themes are easily revealed through the evoking of curiosity in the reader. The main themes of the novel are easily provoked through the focus on emotional variability and an
Dr. King felt passionate about his belief that America's involvement in the Vietnam war was unjust, and decided to write a essay on the topic. Dr. King used many persuasive elements to better his chances of affecting the reader. For example, he uses factual information to push points, reasoning to back up said facts, and emotional appeal to speak to the reader on a personal level. Dr. King makes specific points on the unjust use of the poor during the war and the persistent issue of social inequality still plaguing America. Using these methods Dr. King is able to better persuade the reader on the issue at hand.
Through his words, King paints a vivid picture of the horrors American soldiers were committing in Vietnam. This use of emotional appeal causes American citizens to feel compassion towards Vietnamese victims. Therefore, listeners would feel compelled to pull American troops from Vietnam in order to put a stop to the atrocities being committed there. His words remain emotional, while still providing facts as to why he believes the war is causing more harm than is necessary. Those who favor Johnson’s support of the war would argue that Johnson does not need to rely on the persuasive methods of pathos in order to convince people that the Vietnam War is essential to the survival of America.
In 1967, Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his speech “Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence.” In the speech, King argues against American involvement in the Vietnam War and explains why he cannot remain silent. King builds an effective argument by using imagery, noting the irony associated with the war, and pointing out the contrast between America before the war and America then. One of King’s main techniques he uses to persuade the audience of his point is imagery.
Public space is a shared landscape that all citizens have the potential to encounter. These areas, especially in major cities like Philadelphia, are saturated with statues depicting historical figures and a variety of artwork. Memorials are also included in this public area and become a representation of a certain memory for the public to share. When conflicts occur, such as a major war, more than just the government and the military are involved. A nations economy is torn apart, and certain industries and their materials become focused on the war effort.
Imagine making a speech in front of large audience. The speech "Beyond Vietnam - A Time to Break Silence" by Martin Luther King Jr. was delivered at Riverside Church in New York City on April 4, 1967. He effectively builds an argument by using three models of persuasion ethos, pathos, and logos to persuade his audience that American involvement in the Vietnam War is unjust. The first technique King used is based on ethos, establishing his credibility. King convinces the audience gaining credibility describing how the "desperate, rejected, and angry young men," (...) "ask - and rightly so - what about Vietnam?" in feedback to King's thought in peace.
Throughout the first paragraph of King’s speech, he used emotional diction with words such as struggle, poverty, and poor to prove that the war in Vietnam was bringing down the American’s and their families fighting overseas. King proved this partly with the quote, “America would never invest the necessary funds… in the rehabilitation of its poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued…” (King, Beyond, 9). King was establishing his point that America was more troubled about healing and adjusting other countries, but would never invest the same in their own country. He was in the process of proving that it wasn 't a money issue in America, but an equality issue.
Martin Luther King was a determined activist for equality for all. King spoke for the weak that did not have the voices to speak for themselves; for example, he represented the poor. Recognizing that citizens in poverty were not able to support their families while away from home at war, Martin Luther King included that “ war [and being enlisted in battle was] … an enemy of poor” to demonstrate how even though any man could be drafted, the economically stable left behind support for their family while the impoverished were ineligible of doing so (Source A). Rhetorical devices are included in Martin Luther King’s speeches to prove conflict. For example, this quote personifies war as being an enemy.
Tim discovers the violence and thirst for power from the death of his best friend. His father’s death shows him the disillusionment and reality of war. Finally, the execution of his only brother makes him aware of the injustice and disloyalty of both sides. The pain Tim experiences and the desolation he sees in those around him prove to him that the fight isn’t worth the cost. Throughout history, people have had to suffer immense amounts of pain not knowing whether or not their descendents have a chance at freedom.
Dr. King feels that he cannot speak against violence being used in the ghettos without having protested the greatest use of violence, “[his] own government.” (Paragraph 3). Dr. King uses specificity such as “Molotov cocktails and rifles” (Paragraph 3) to create a vivid image of the violence that has occurred in his own nation. Dr. King made this speech to address the violence going on in the Vietnam War.
In his 1967 speech on the Vietnam War, Martin Luther King, Jr. employs figurative language and syntactical elements to construct his argument against the hypocrisy and cruelty of American involvement in the war. Martin Luther King, Jr. utilizes figurative to emphasize the inhumanity and immorality of the war. In describing the ways in which the war is detrimental to the American people, King writes that "Vietnam [continues] to draw men and skills and money like some demonic destructive suction tube" (King). King draws a comparison between the war and an unholy vaccuum while enumerating what the U.S. loses as a result of the war to shed light on the resources and lives that could be better spent improving the U.S. itself as opposed to acting
Martin Luther King Jr. disagreed with the way the war was being handled, and thought nonviolent demonstrations would be more efficient. In his speech, “Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence” Martin Luther King Jr., uses appeals to emotion, appeals to credibility, and powerful diction to strengthen his argument and persuade his audience that the Vietnam War is unjust. First, Martin Luther King Jr. uses emotional appeals to persuade his audience that the Vietnam War is unjust because it is unfairly killing the poor and its destroying the country. King uses emotional words and descriptions to capture the audience’s attention and convey the injustices caused by the Vietnam War.
Everywhere around the world should give students the opportunity to go to college without having to pay for tuition. Only some people have the privilege of pursuing a college education. College tuition has risen an abundant amount over the past few years, and people have had more student debt now than ever before. We should change this and follow the path we want without having mountains of debt. Public college tuition should be free for all because it will lower the amount of student debt, and everyone will be able to get a college education.
In the novel The March E. L. Doctorow expresses the theme of the negative effects of war more specifically in the south towards the end of the civil war. The way he connected the point of view to the theme was from different people of the south and there dreadful daily lives during and at the end of the war. The author strived for historical content with a mix of fiction to entertain the audience- but in this book he showed how war impacted their lives. In a way, he wanted to prove a point that war is a devastating extravaganza.
