ipl-logo

Rhetorical Strategies For Gun Ownership

1186 Words5 Pages

Gun owners throughout the United States are bound together by their ownership of a firearm(s), resulting in a, more-or-less, “community” of people with common characteristics. This being the possession of a gun. The article, “Gun demanding: the psychology of why people want firearm”, brings insight into the mind of a gun owner, such as the people within one's immediate family, or oneself. The Guardian, the news outlet that published the article, carries a very unfavorable view of gun ownership throughout the column, to say the least. Regardless, the rhetor, Dean Burnett, uses a wide range of rhetorical strategies such as logos, rhetorical questions, and tone, just to name a few, to enhance his article and give some credibility to the statements …show more content…

The use of this rhetorical strategy is meant to mock owners of such guns saying that gun owners are really just paranoid and have succumbed to social pressure; they don't really need these objects, they just want them. People from all walks of life don't see owning these objects as something they want, but as something they need for protection, along with the fact that people who don’t own a gun currently aren't entirely opposed to owning one in the future. Actually over half, 52%, of all non-gun owners say they are open to owning a gun some point in the near or further future. This shows that it is not “social pressure” making gun owners continue to keep their firearms, rather they would want to continue protecting their families and that other people are seeing that as a viable option for themselves. If anything, in the current political climate we are in today, there would be much more social pressure for one not to own a gun than there would be to continue owning one. The stigma around guns still exists today that one only wants a gun to show off and go hunting and promote one's “toxic masculinity” as the article so gracefully puts. Nonetheless, the rhetorical questions the rhetor uses would be effective to someone on the more liberal side of the aisle to continue and promote their specific ideology about who uses guns and

Show More
Related
1212 Words | 5 Pages

A tool used to liberate America from england to assist it to become the hegemon of the 20th century is in the midst of creating war in american society. The right to bear arms has created a heated debate in american politics. Two of such debates is from Patrick Radden Keefe who advocates for the the urgency and the need to regulate gun control and James Q. Wilson who promotes that gun gun control is not the problem and through the use of pathos and ethos these authors champion their truths. I believe that gun control should be regulated and that arms should not be so readily available to the

Read More
610 Words | 3 Pages

Jack Hunter’s “How Gun Control Kills” takes a more logical stance on the current issue of gun control. However, Hunter starts off using pathos, an appeal to emotion, and ethos, appealing to ethics. “Is there an evil worse than killing children?” Hunter asks in the opening paragraph. “Is there anything more heart-wrenching than the feeling of absolute helplessness in our inability to protect them?”

Read More
1059 Words | 5 Pages

For many years, gun control has been a disagreeable topic to debate about. From , The Legal Information Institute, the Second Amendment states, “the right of the people to keep and bear arms.” In other words, citizens of America have the right to keep weapons in homes for self defense. Which clearly means the Second Amendment has established the foundation of gun control, which has caused many debates in the past, and in current times. Authors use rhetorical appeals, ethos, logos, and pathos, when discussing issues such as gun control to persuade readers to take one side or the other.

Read More
836 Words | 4 Pages

Guns don’t kill people. People kill people. Many believe this, but columnist Nicholas Kristof, author of “Our Blind Spot about Guns,” published in 2014 in the New York Times, disagrees. A rhetorical analysis should consist of: logos, pathos, and ethos. Kristof’s use of logos is strong due to the amount of facts and statistics he offers to his audience, but he fails to strongly use pathos and ethos, due to the lack of these elements Kristof’s argument is weakened.

Read More
779 Words | 4 Pages

After each mass shooting, the aftermath is the same; tearful vigils, incensed television pundits, and bereft survivors dominate the news cycle. This contemporary sensationalism in the media charges the American debate over gun ownership with strong emotions and distracts from fact. Hence arises the gun debate’s incorrigible characteristics of misinformation, misperception, and polarization, such that, for instance, Americans’ emotions are so entrenched in their opinions that they cannot reach “consensus as a society” as to what exactly assault rifles are, much less what the law thereabout should be (Source A). But the emotional atmosphere of the American gun debate extends far beyond assault rifles alone; it creates statistically significant discrepancies between factual truth and popular American sentiment on all gun control issues.

Read More
1700 Words | 7 Pages

In today’s society, one of the most alienating issues in American politics is gun control. More specifically, the issue is whether or not guns should be banned in the United States. Some people would say that guns should be banned because it would reduce crime as a whole and keep citizens safer. These people, enthusiasts of stricter gun laws, fear being safe in their country where there are so many people who have access to guns. Opponents of this argument, however, also fear losing safety.

Read More
1647 Words | 7 Pages

For others, a view that has arose later, guns are the “perpetuation of illicit social hierarchies, the elevation of force over reason,” and a promoter of collectivity and remover of individuality. This latter view of guns is a direct application of the conflict theory. For those who hold this view, and likely support the passage of gun control laws, guns are representative of social inequality that is abundant in modern society, that the usage of guns is a means of violently coercing those of lower classes to remain in their class. The view of guns as a symbol of protection is also an application of the conflict theory.

Read More
1108 Words | 5 Pages

A weapon in the wrongs hands is the maximum danger humanity can face. Nowadays, violence and delinquency in society are viewed as the maximum problem solver. Humanity is full of chaos; hate and envy seize our souls. Guns are the ultimate security for some citizens but for others, these add to a feeling of defenselessness. Throughout history, any topic related to guns means a plethora of problems.

Read More
909 Words | 4 Pages

Get rid of guns in homes, and on the streets, and, as much as possible, on police” (Bovy 1). Those in favor of open carry have turned anti-gun control into an issue of pride and legacy versus an issue of safety. “As if gun ownership were simply a cultural tradition to be respected, and not, you know, about owning guns. Guns… I mean, must it really be spelled out what’s different? It’s absurd to reduce an anti-gun position to a snooty aesthetic preference” (Bovy 3).

Read More
1386 Words | 6 Pages

The use of and the owning of guns is a very hot and debated topic in society today. For many, this is a life and death debate due to the recent and numerous school shootings. These school shootings have caused an outcry for more gun control, specifically in relation to the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. Despite these calls, increased gun control is not the answer. Most gun owners’ use their guns responsibly and for good purposes.

Read More
642 Words | 3 Pages

“Our Blind Spot about Guns” Rhetorical Analysis Essay American Journalist, Nicholas Kristof, in his essay, “Our Blind Spot about Guns”, addresses that if only guns were regulated and controlled like cars, there would be less fatalities. Kristof’s purpose is to emphasize how much safer cars are now than in the past, while guns do not have the same precautions. He constructs a compelling tone in order to convince the reader that the government should take more control on the safety of guns and who purchases them. Kristof builds credibility by successfully exerting emotional appeals on the audience, citing plausible statistics, and discussing what could possibly be done to prevent gun fatalities. Kristof begins his essay by discussing how automobile

Read More
1278 Words | 6 Pages

These tragedies range from accidents and suicides to horrific mass shootings … It’s estimated that Americans own more than 300 million guns. From this viewpoint, it is shown that the U.S’s issue with gun violence stems from the availability of guns. To condense the amount of mass shootings, guns mustn’t be simple to obtain.

Read More
744 Words | 3 Pages

“Gun Control for Dummies” is a comic illustrated by William Warren. The comic depicts a before and after situation. In these situations, a law-abiding citizen originally has two firearms and is standing next to a criminal who also has a gun. However, in the “after” scenario the citizen no longer has possession of firearms, but the criminal next to him does. The author’s claim in this comic is that gun control will not prevent criminals from keeping or obtaining guns but will leave law-abiding citizens without protection.

Read More
429 Words | 2 Pages

Gun Control in America Gun control in America is a highly debated subject. James Wilson speaks against gun control in his article “Gun Control Isn’t the Answer”. Gun laws need to be more restricted. Gun control reform is needed to safeguard children and prevent access to those with mental illness and a criminal background. Wilson talks about the shooting at Virginia Tech using it as a platform to talk about people not weapons being responsible for the tragedy.

Read More
1774 Words | 8 Pages

This makes us wonder why people can be so defensive over something like a gun that is so dangerous and has lead to a lot of deaths in the American society. Gun control is essential in our society today because it will help prevent unnecessary shootings and crime rate Gun control will play a major part in the decrease of the crime and murder rate. Therefore, in my point of view, guns should be totally controlled and regulated by the government. If gun ownership is controlled by the government, only a limited number of people will be allowed to own guns. In addition, the regulations will make it difficult for people to access guns unless they have a concrete reason as to why they need the weapon.

Read More

More about Rhetorical Strategies For Gun Ownership

Open Document