ipl-logo

Rhetorical Analysis Of An Article By Cesar Chavez

547 Words3 Pages

Within the article by Cesar Chavez, the author argues that nonviolence is a better solution to violence. Throughout the argument, Chavez utilizes different rhetorical strategies to convince his audience that nonviolence is more effective than violence. The main rhetorical strategies that are used by Chavez to develop the argument are pathos, parallelism, and diction. In the text, pathos is used to create an emotional bond with the argument and the audience. The purpose of the emotional bond is to convince the audience is the better solution than violence. As Chavez utilizes pathos in the statement, “Our conviction is that human life is a very special possession given by God to man and that no one has the right to take it for any cause(Chavez).” This means that violent protests are a cause of death amongst those who are fighting, and death is used as pathos to connect the feeling of emotional loss to the audience. Through the use of the feeling of death, Chavez employs to convince the audience emotionally that violence is not a form a protest. …show more content…

With parallelism, Chavez is able to convince the audience of positive outcomes. For example, “”Nonviolence supports you if you have a just and moral cause. Nonviolence provides the opportunity to stay on the offensive, and that is of crucial importance to win any contest(Chavez).” In the quote, Chavez indicates that nonviolence proves that a cause is morally just and allows success for that activism. Parallelism is used to convince the audience with the parallel structure, which emphasizing the efficiency of nonviolence by aligning the reasons why pacification is important. Overall, parallelism convinces the audience the positive influence of nonviolence that is exemplified through parallel

Show More
Related

Rhetorical Analysis Of Caesar Chavez's Message Of Nonviolence

222 Words | 1 Pages

(Chavez 13) All these protests have just led to more violence and not helped. He brings up that the “poor and workers” are the ones killed in the violence. (Chavez 13) The normal people contributed to the violence and gained nothing from it.

Read More

Jose Garcia Perez Rhetorical Analysis

75 Words | 1 Pages

Hey, Snapchat I 'm Jose Garcia Perez, I make short comedy snaps on this social media platform I realized that there are multiple accounts impersonating me. This is affecting me and my fans which can possibly direct them to a fake or a fraud account I want to know if there is a way to fix this solution if there is fix please don 't hesitate to message me by email. Thank you Snapchat for your

Read More

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Article By Cesar Chavez

543 Words | 3 Pages

In Cesar Chavez's article he begins to compare the past with the present. He asks the audience to "examine history," Chavez also questions the audience by asking, "Who gets killed in a violent revolution? The poor, the workers". Chavez puts into perspective how violent actions have caused nothing but harm to revolutions and the people involved in those

Read More

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Article By Cesar Chavez

265 Words | 2 Pages

Cesar Chavez persuades his farm workers that nonviolence is as powerful as violence. He says that people should try to eliminate the amount of violence we use. Chavez does this in a unique way across his article by using personification, irony, and oxymoron to persuade the farm workers. Cesar Chavez uses personification throughout the article to help create characteristics to non living objects.

Read More

Cesar Chavez My Faith In Action Summary

800 Words | 4 Pages

The Gospel of Cesar Chavez: My Faith in Action, by Mario T. Garcia, uses Cesar Chavez’s own words to express his spiritual and religious personality and how it led him to organize a movement for a change in the farm workers’ lifestyle of America. Through his experiences and observations with religion and spirituality growing up, Cesar created his own myth by conveying nonviolence and self-sacrifice as the basis of his American religious experience. Thus, paving the way towards reform for farm workers. To be able to understand Cesar’s motive behind his movement, violence and nonviolence needs to be distinguished. A violent movement is a protest that is set up to achieve a goal by using violent acts (riots, house raids, etc.).

Read More

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Speech By Cesar Chavez

412 Words | 2 Pages

The audience that Chavez is addressing is very familiar with Dr. King, and the troubles he went through so it is not hard at all to relate to the audience with ideas of Martin Luther King. “ Nonviolence provides the opportunity to stay on the offensive, and that is a crucial importance to win any contest.” With subject of violent an nonviolent means is so important to almost everyone that it makes almost everyone stand on their toes. With the subject Chavez does a good job of stating “we” instead of “I” because of

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of The Power Of Violence By Cesar Chavez

786 Words | 4 Pages

(Chavez 1) His nonviolent approach to difficulties still have a huge aftermath in our world and change it for the better. The author really emphasizes the trueness of King’s character and his example to our struggling lives to make a better world. Additionally, Chavez uses emotion to change the readers view to the capability nonviolence has. For example, “We are convinced that when people are faced with a direct

Read More

Violence By Cesar Chavez Summary

323 Words | 2 Pages

Violence is never an adequate solution to achieving the goals of civil rights- well, according to Cesar Chavez. Ten years after the death of Martin Luther King Jr., civil rights advocate, Cesar Chavez published an article on his theories of nonviolent resistance. He states his position clearly, and is very adamant as well: no good comes from violence, as it causes additional problems and is only successful temporarily. Chavez builds his argument using particularly explicit diction, making his stance evident. He additionally makes use of contrasting diction to distinguish between violence and nonviolence, and introduces Martin Luther King Jr. and Gandhi to establish credibility.

Read More

Cesar Chavez Ethos Pathos Logos

651 Words | 3 Pages

He insists on the fact that inhumane vengeance will lead to injury and death, as well as “demoralization”. This argument is greatly supported by the death of Dr. King Jr; his view of nonviolence helped to grow and mature the farm worker’s movement. Civil workers are guilted into supporting their fallen hero in order to fulfill his dying wish. Chavez instructs them to “overcome… [their] frustrations” and support their causes through methods of peaceful protests. Chavez, appealing to their sense of emotion, manages to persuade a disconnected society by desperately wanting to avenge Dr. King’s untimely

Read More

Juxtaposition In Cesar Chavez Speech

662 Words | 3 Pages

To begin with, Chavez uses logos in his speech through a rhetorical question, “Who gets killed in the case of violent revolution? The poor, the workers.” The people who are arguing for violent revolutions are mostly poor workers whom Chavez refers to. Chavez uses logic to show these people that if they use violent revolts, they are most likely the ones going to be killed which for the most part will deter the people who are aiming for this. Another appeal Chavez uses is ethos to show everyone as people we are expected to do the right thing.

Read More

Cesar Chavez Ethos Pathos Logos

606 Words | 3 Pages

He states that the amount of misery, poverty, and exploitation there is or could be does not even come close to the value of a human life. He used pathos to show the audience that he truly believes and cares for the people of the United States, especially those struggling. The people who partake in violent approaches may believe that it does not matter what they want or think because there will not be a change without a form of violence. Chavez wants to show that losing lives is not worth it, that people are more valuable than any type of struggle. Unity and having an equal standing is more important so that the country is stronger

Read More

Cesar Chavez Ethos Pathos Logos

699 Words | 3 Pages

He states that staying nonviolent despite the oppression and the hardship will prove to people the moral strength of those fighting for justice and shows others the reason as to why they should give his movement their support. Chavez also states that human rights are given to them by God and no one should be able to take that away which is something that any Christian reading his article would agree with. He continues to state how people are inherently good the migrant farm workers nonviolently protesting are continuing despite how hard it seems to try to convince those that are also morally good that they should support the movement. The people who read this article are the same ones who help the protest and furthering of the Civil Rights Movement, so Chavez is trying to show them that this movement is just as unjust and important to

Read More

Cesar Chavez's Ethos Pathos Logos

483 Words | 2 Pages

the violence will escalate”, he uses repetition (Chavez 13-15). This constant use of these words underlines an obvious contrast and provides the reader with a clearer understanding of the benefits nonviolence can bring and all of the detrimental effects violent resistance has.

Read More

Summary Of Non Violence By Chavez

536 Words | 3 Pages

“ Examine history. Who gets killed in the case of violent revolution? The poor, the workers. The people of the land are the ones who give their bodies and don’t really gain that much for it.” This conveys Chavez’s argument because using violence will only lead to suffering by the poor just because they are fighting for something that they believe in.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Nonviolence In Cesar Chavez's Article

409 Words | 2 Pages

In a magazine article by Cesar Chavez on the 10th anniversary of the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Junior, Chavez discusses the advantages of nonviolent resistance versus violent resistance, arguing that “nonviolence is more powerful than violence.” Chavez successfully develops his argument for nonviolent resistance by utilizing the rhetorical strategies of repetition and allusion. Chavez utilizes the rhetorical strategy of repetition throughout the article, repeating words like “nonviolent” and “we” to develop his and others’ stance on nonviolent resistance. Whenever Chavez states the word “nonviolent”, it is usually followed by its positive effects. For example, in the quote “nonviolence supports you if you have a just moral cause,” the word nonviolence is stated and is followed by its positive effect of supporting those with a righteous reasoning,

Read More

More about Rhetorical Analysis Of An Article By Cesar Chavez

Related Topics

Open Document