The fervent ideal-searching that entails scientific research is an endeavor that encompasses not only intellectual bounds but also the mental and emotional fixtures present in the mind of a scientific pioneer. Mere thoughts and notions become materialized tools and obstacles, and the journey that takes place within becomes the foundation by which scientific theory is ascertained. Wielding thoughts as stepping stones is crucial to the duty of the scientist, and even a degree of uncertainty must be harnessed for success and improvement. In this excerpt from The Great Influenza, John M. Barry pieces together a passionate study on the character of scientific research through the artful use of rhetorical strategies including syntax, hypothetical …show more content…
Barry directs his sentences is nearly that of a prophecy. In lines 1-3, Barry begins his didacticism with a parallel sentence structure in which one emotion leads to a notion— his description of certainty as a bastion lends the impression that it is more favorable than uncertainty, for “[c]ertainty creates strength… Uncertainty creates weakness”. By introducing these two emotions as contrasting outcomes, Barry gives the reader an idea that is added upon in the excerpt. He then states that the scientist “requires not only intelligence and curiosity” (Barry 6-7). It is at this moment the reader will realize that there is a deeper facet to scientific research, and the manner in which barry lists the many qualities required of a scientist confirms this notion. Indeed, Barry continues to make use of loose sentence structures throughout in order to support his claims with details and logos. “And just as Einstein refused to accept his own theory” (Barry 16-17) are words that lend to the incredibility by which …show more content…
Barry expresses the need for a scientist to possess “passion, patience, creativity, self-sufficiency, and courage” (Barry 7-8). He further explicates the word courage as not a pivot by which the pioneer dashes into the unknown but as the beacon by which the investigator must accept, utilize, and even “embrace” (Barry 10). Barry also uses diction to support the ultimatum he presents as the character of scientific research by using the word “ultimately” in lines 19 and 49. The word “ultimately” is a readily usable term that reiterates the finality of any notion, and Barry makes excellent use of it because it allows him to create a profound characterization of scientific research— his ultimatum revolves around the uncertainty which paradoxically captures the meaning of scientific research as concrete theorization founded upon infinite possibility. The pandering of intellectual curiosity to physical emotions is an irony that is not lost on Barry; he reaffirms that “to move forcefully and aggressively” requires “confidence and strength deeper than physical courage” (Barry 20-22). The diction of Barry’s study gives the reader a comprehension that physical notions and intellectual thought have boundaries that are not as defined as they may
Some think of science as advantageous, while others believe it can be immoral. Acts of science can lead to manipulation of the natural world and cause those performing the experiments to “play God.” Nathaniel Hawthorne 's short stories “Dr. Heidegger’s Experiment,” “Rappaccini’s Daughter,” and “The Birthmark” each incorporate characters that attempt to alter a natural aspect of life and in turn are met with failure. It is through his short stories that Nathaniel Hawthorne reveals opinion of science: Men should not engage in scientific studies that require them to act as God.
This is in part due to the recent increase of writings about “distrust of science from professionals in different fields such as journalists, scientists, physicians, psychologists, and sociologists. “While this work contains valuable insights and perspectives on the problem, many authors make sweeping generalizations and lump together disparate questions that involve different methodologies and types of evidence” (Kabat). The infiltration of conspiracies in the academic world is causing contradictory viewpoints to clash with one another. As these viewpoints increase, the truth will only become more muddled. “Rejection of critical probing when the results are inconvenient, a tolerance for “alternative facts,” and an ahistorical and partisan-grounded attitude toward (scientific) issues are all manifestations of this trend, which is particularly severe”
Olivia Seeney ENGL 305 The Art of the Essay 3/22/17 Insert Flap A and Throw Away Analysis The main point of this essay was to point out to the reader the ridiculous state of human nature when presented with a situation that is outside of our expertise. As we observe the narrator’s struggle to put together this cardboard toy, his use of both overstatement and understatement show the progression of his frustration with this task. One example of this ironic language can be found in the first sentence when the narrator states “I made a most interesting discovery: the shortest, cheapest, method of inducing a nervous breakdown ever perfected. (Perelman)”
Alan Lightman, a physicist, social entrepreneur, and creative writer of various works, including Our Place in the Universe: “Face to Face with the Infinite,” is written for the general public. This essay, takes the reader through humanity’s scientific discovery. For example, in his introduction, Lightman catches the reader’s attention by telling his own story so the readers can relate to it. Throughout the essay, the concept of size is predominant. Lightman conveys our place in the universe through the representation of a scale to let readers understand the universe.
Frankenstein by Mary Shelley has been an American classic for almost 200 years, which contains both philosophical and moral themes in the text, making the reader question the limits of humankind and its desire for power. For every character presented in the story their independent desire to overcome their intentions becomes so intense that the future that lies upon them is nothing close to what they can imagine. Victor Frankenstein´s desire to quench his thirst for power ends up clouding his judgement and making him elude the future that awaits him. As Victor´s intention to succeed in natural sciences grow to an abnormal point, his judgement about what to do with that knowledge didn't let him contemplate the future consequences
Critical Thinking: 1) Is there a clear position/thesis statement? - Yes a. What is it? “Zombies are a reflection of their own narcissistic personality with poor education and lack of awareness of their own society/culture” b. How does it address the question asked.
It is after two paragraphs exploring notions of man’s cosmic connection that Sagan asserts his first claim in the essay, “plainly there is no way back… we are stuck with science” (1). The compassionate tone persists even in assertions, as seen through the use of first person. More compassionate is the gentle acknowledgement of the pseudoscience appeal. “Yes, the world would be a more interesting place if there were UFOs lurking in the deep waters off Bermuda… or if our dreams could, more often than can be explained by chance and our knowledge of the world, accurately foretell the future” (1). This series of sentences ends the introduction.
This gives an idea that there is a sense of doubt when it comes to facing obstacles such as scientist’s research and beliefs. “Scientists must accept the fact that all his or her work, even beliefs, may break apart upon the sharp edge of a single laboratory finding.” These points illustrate that scientists must be able to deal with uncertainty by having the “...intelligence and curiosity...passion, patience, creativity, self-sufficiency, and courage.”, which
Mond explains, in this quote, how science cannot remain the sole factor in achieving happiness. Throughout the story, the Controllers condition the people to view science as the greatest good, but new discoveries often lack what makes an individual happy. Process often infringes on what people as a whole consider as happy. They feel contentment but individuality and passion push brilliant individuals to discover more scientifically. Beauty lies in truth.
In the year 1936, sixth grader Phyllis Wright wrote a letter to Albert Einstein with hopes of a response. She asked if and what scientists pray for, which Einstein would eventually respond to. The response is rhetorically effect due to Einstein’s uses of ethos, logos, and pathos. First, Einstein establishes ethos within his letter.
He is not going to contradict science nor religion; however, he may state the definite possibilities of science and how they may correlate with his religious views. This characterization of pathos in the sentence “… these laws is only only imperfect and fragmentary…” relieves the readers' emotions in their religion as well as confirm his perspective on the matter. This allows the reader to feel a strong passion with their own religion and still be diligent to the belief of science. Einstein also uses logos to open a broader perspective for the reader by stating scientific laws. Helping the reader draw a clearer view of the topic, He uses precise statements, that to him, are backed up by emotional connections to his higher spirit displayed by his pathos.
In order to be successful, knowledge is a key factor. For centuries people have gone to school to study math, history, literature, and science. While studying science is beneficial, it can hold consequences if morals and ethics are not applied. In the past, and even today, humans have encountered what science without a conscience can lead to. In Frankenstein, a cautionary tale by Mary Shelley, the reader is given a more extreme example that proves science has boundaries and shows many consequences without responsibility and ethics.
The scientists’ attempt to play god and mess with the forces of nature make things worse in the long run for everyone involved, as they did not consider the actual dangers but only their own glory. When faced with unprecedented obstacles, the scientists do not know how to respond and rather abandon Charlie and leave him to his isolated muses. The reality that one cannot accurately or confidently predict the results of the unknown continues to be proven in modern
Human beings live their life full of questions. Those questions could be answered in two ways: the response of the scientist, or the response of the poet. I mean by the response of the scientist all the technical details that will prove the theory. On the other hand, the poet gives a more spiritual answer. For instance, “How does one die?”
In referring to persons as scientists, Kelly only meant that we are all constantly engaged in the process of understanding ourselves and the world around us. Like scientists in the laboratory, we test this understanding by making predictions about the observable outcomes of events. And like applied scientists and engineers, we use our refined understanding to reshape ourselves or some aspect of the world in which we live. In this way, scientific activity is a constant and essential aspect of human existence. Kelly's description of personality in terms of cognitive processes.