ipl-logo

Rhetorical Analysis Of The Imperators And The Augurs

794 Words4 Pages

The Imperators and the Augurs were contemplating whether to reestablish Rome as a Republic or to remain as an empire. The Imperators were in favor of reverting back into a Republic while the Augurs wanted to keep things the same. The Augurs did make a good couple of points about keeping it the same Empire, the Imperators made a better argument to return to a Republic because they used a lot of allusion and effective usages of persuasion to strengthen their argument. The Senator from the Imperator really emphasizes her ethos to point out the flaws that the Empire had endured. She mentioned how she had been involved in politics at a young age and how her family has the connections before as well. She accentuated her points using repetition ("As a politician...") to get the audience to understand her point of view. As a politician, she has the firsthand experience about how the current empire works …show more content…

She uses mainly pathos and a very interesting tone throughout her speech about how maintaining an Empire will lead to a collapse altogether. With her unique tone, she retold how the Julio-Claudius emperors are a failure and any more leaders like them will be catastrophic. She also believed that having rulers from the same bloodline is not practical as it creates the same, if not, worse issues for Rome. This was proven during Nero's regime where over time, citizens grew to despise him to the point where Nero commits suicide. Jill uses the people's hatred to influence the audience. She also compares Caligula's regime over defying the God as emperors are not allowed to see themselves as Gods. By disrespecting the Gods, many people would take great offense to it which makes it easier for Jill to charm her audience with pathos. By point out the disasters that the emperors inflicted on their citizens, Jill was able to persuade the audience, including

Show More
Related
231 Words | 1 Pages

Crevecoeur utilizes syntactic devices of anaphora, rhetorical questions, and finally hypophora in order to convey his zeal of the American dream to convince penurious Europeans to move to the US. Throughout the piece, Crevecoeur emphasizes his grievances with anaphora by continually repeating “no” before a reason. By doing so, he entices his audience, the impoverished Europeans, with ideas of social mobility. He tells about how people should not be confined to an unfair social hierarchy and controlled under the aristocracy. By focusing on how there is no large class difference in America, he implicitly reveals the faults in the European governments’ systems.

Read More
587 Words | 3 Pages

The Onion uses satirical humor to poke fun at modern advertisements and the gullibility of Americans have by mocking the techniques used to sell consumer goods; it does this through its mocking publication of a product called MagnaSoles. This article uses quotes from customers that have bought MagnaSoles, subtle jokes and puns, and the over exaggeration of the sciences implemented by Magnasoles. The article is rampant with subtle hints, jokes, and puns that key the reader in that this article is a joke. With the use of "pseudoscientists" and "pseudoscience" used throughout the article, as well as the "scientific-sounding literature", this is an indicator that this is not real science talking. It also makes fun of the use of making a paper seem more credible through its constant

Read More
284 Words | 2 Pages

How can my fellow community members in Hadamar do nothing, while you murder my son and others with mental illnesses? As this question continues to plague my mind, I cannot fathom how you justify these actions. My son, Jonathan, is not “genetically defective” as you say, my son is not a “financial burden,” and my son is certainly not “inferior” to any of the other Germans. My son is a true gift from God, not some barbarian whose only use is to be gassed.

Read More
233 Words | 1 Pages

Gregor’s initial reaction to his transformation shows his preoccupation with work. His confusion over his radical transformation does not last long, quickly becoming concerned with work and disregarding that he woke up physically transformed into a monstrous vermin. Immediately after realizing he had transformed, Gregor explains, “Well, I haven’t given up hope completely; once I’ve gotten the money together to pay off my parents’ debt to [the boss] that will probably take another five to six years… But for the time being I’d better get up, since my train leaves at five” (4). The quick transition of Gregor’s thoughts from the initial shock to his economic duties reveals his ironic nonchalant attitude towards his nonsensical transformation and

Read More
926 Words | 4 Pages

The Gracchi brothers, Tiberius and Gaius, had intentions of making Rome the best it could be, which contradicted the visions of the Senators. The two brothers grew up during a tough time in the Roman Empire, but they took it upon themselves to make a difference. “The Empire went through tremendous growth, through both acquisition of land, slaves, and various citizen classes.” This drastic growth ultimately led to a fall in the Roman political system. Tiberius, the older brother, founded the idea of the agrarian laws, which was later continued by his younger brother, Gaius, after his death.

Read More
148 Words | 1 Pages

In “What We Are to Advertisers” and “Men’s Men and Women’s Women” both Twitchell and Craig reveal how advertisers utilize stereotypes to manipulate and persuade consumers into purchasing their products. Companies label their audience and advertise to them accordingly. Using reliable sources such as Stanford Research Institute, companies are able to use the data to their advantage to help market their products to a specific demographic. Craig and Twitchell give examples of this ploy in action by revealing how companies use “positioning” to advertise the same product to two demographics to earn more profit. Craig delves more into the advertisers ' plan by exposing the science behind commercials.

Read More
676 Words | 3 Pages

In Niccolo Machiavelli's book, The Prince (1513), he evaluates on how a prince can be a successful leader. Machiavelli’s purpose of this guidebook was to construct his argument to the rising ruler Giuliano de Medici for when he comes to power in Florence. He adopts a casual but authoritative tone in order to convince the prince that Machiavelli’s evaluation on how to be the best prince, is the right thing for the prince to do without coming off as he knows more than the prince or is trying to intimidate him.. Machiavelli’s reference to previous rulers and whether their tactics failed or succeeded helps to benefit his credibility along with his allusion to historic text. He appeals to our logic by simply stating a prince can only do what is within his power to control, and his use of an analogy furthers his argument.

Read More
377 Words | 2 Pages

In Pascal’s Pensees, the difference between reason and believing are two completely different things. For Pascal, believing in God is good for the heart, but for all the non-believers, reason could be the only way to get closer to God. On other hand, there was a point where Pascal stated that there are somethings that reason does not understand the result, but the only thing that can understand the impossible is God. Thus, in Pascal tells his audience that the impossible reasoning is only understand by having God in their hearts.

Read More
429 Words | 2 Pages

Mark Twain, an 18th century humorist, was known for his critical and satirical writing. In one of his most famous essays, “ Fenimore Coopers Literary Offenses” Twain addresses Coopers inability to realistically develop a “situation” and his failure to effectively back up his stories in order for them to be more plausible. To dramatically convey his unimpressed and sarcastic attitude, he applies biting diction, metaphors and hypophora throughout this work . By continuously using biting diction, Twain develops a mocking tone towards Fenimore Cooper’s incapability to create even the simplest of storylines. In the title of the work a sarcastic tone is evident; the word choice is utilized to reinforce the argument stating how Coopers work is an offense to the world of literature.

Read More
1213 Words | 5 Pages

Euripides forwards Medea’s revenge through her use of Rhetoric in her dialogue. Rhetoric is language used intended to persuade or influence another person’s decisions or ideology. Medea’s use of Rhetoric conveys her cunning and deceitful nature in the play: she appeals to the ethical standpoint of the all-female Chorus, she appeals to the emotion of Creon to persuade him and Aegeus for her own advantage. Jason’s use of Rhetoric against Medea is exposed by her argument on the ethics of marriage that he has tarnished. Medea uses Ethos, the persuasion through ethical arguments, to appeal to the female Chorus who live in a patriarchal land.

Read More
515 Words | 3 Pages

She asks her son rhetorically if Cicero would have been such a great leader had he not been "roused, kindled and inflamed. " Here, Adams is explaining that to become a great leader, one must go through great trials. Also, Adams compares her son to

Read More
1758 Words | 8 Pages

Virgil’s Aeneid sets out to tell a history of Rome that conforms to the contemporary political realities of the Roman empire. In doing so, Virgil outlines the theme of politics and the influence people have on it. He presents male political activities as positive whereas female roles are deemed for the most part disruptive. Although he incorporates women, Virgil upholds a patriarchal political system at both the divine and mortal level as a way of appealing to Augustus Caesar, the emperor who commissions him to write the epic.

Read More
1512 Words | 7 Pages

The composition and the governing structure of the Roman republic was not uniform throughout its existence, but some of the fundamental elements of its government came into being in the immediate aftermath of the monarchy’s collapse. Therefore, it is unsurprising that many of these institutions were created in reaction to the monarchy and its failures, and thus were shaped by this relationship. For example, the fundamental opposition to monarchy and the rule of kings that came with the experience of the Kingdom of Rome, remained quite strong in the Roman mindset throughout the existence of the Republic and into the beginnings of the Roman Empire, and its influence can be seen throughout Roman political discourse especially in the discussion

Read More
932 Words | 4 Pages

In the play Antigone, Sophocles demonstrates the conflict between family and God through the characters of Antigone, Ismene and Creon. Antigone being ambitious and strong willed throughout the play, fights for his brothers honor and proper burial while Ismene on the other hand, is more timid fears the consequences that may occur if the laws are broken. For Creon he is the King and holds most power, until the Gods feel he is incapable. Antigone, Ismene and Creon all use logical and emotional appeals to achieve a compromise to either bury Polynices or not.

Read More
452 Words | 2 Pages

She uses allusion to invoke a sense of purpose in her son completing his journey and gaining the knowledge he needs in order to grow. When Abigail Adams suggest that her son was fortunate enough to witness "who have made glorious defense of their invades liberties. " She uses Americas history into becoming an independent country to show hardship that will come but the outcome from it is even better. Next example she used is, "Would Cicero have shone so distinguished an orator if had not been roused, kindled, and inflamed by the tyranny of Catiline, Verres, and Mark Antony." Adams proposes that adversity will come in life, but it will make him a great leader.

Read More

More about Rhetorical Analysis Of The Imperators And The Augurs

Related Topics

Open Document