Rhetorical Analysis of The Truman Doctrine The Truman doctrine was a new foreign policy introduced by U.S President Harry S. Truman in 1947. It states that the United States must provide military and financial assistance to foreign nations in attempt to combat the uprise on communist nations. The doctrine was created after the idea that soviet expansionism was a security threat to the United States and a threat to international peace. Truman claims that containment of the soviet’s influence was the course of action needed to protect democracy and the free world. The Truman doctrine would later be argued as the start of the cold war. The response was split by critics expressing the concern that it was too aggressive and would cause problems …show more content…
He creates a logical argument of the possible threats that can arise if the soviet influence is not contained. He argued that the US was responsible for defending the value of democracy and freedom, he expressed that if we didn’t stop them nobody would. This is shown evidently when he claims, “the free people look to us for support in maintaining their freedoms”. This expresses the logical idea that if we don’t support them, democracy and freedom will lose. Truman also uses logos to establish the idea that the foreign policy exchange will have mutual benefits for both the United States and the other countries involved. Truman does this by claiming that “One of the primary objectives of the foreign policy of the United States is the creation of conditions in which we and other nations will be able to work out a way of life free from coercion”. This claim fully supports the audiences views no matter who they are, the United States people will collectively agree that they do not support coercion of any kind, this allows the audience to connect something they agree with to Truman’s argument which will further persuade them to accepting his doctrine. Truman used these forms of logos to appeal to the minds of the audience, this type of argument will be supported through his use of pathos which will use the opposite of logic and appeal to the audiences’