ipl-logo

Rhetorical Analysis Of The Truman Doctrine

632 Words3 Pages

Rhetorical Analysis of The Truman Doctrine The Truman doctrine was a new foreign policy introduced by U.S President Harry S. Truman in 1947. It states that the United States must provide military and financial assistance to foreign nations in attempt to combat the uprise on communist nations. The doctrine was created after the idea that soviet expansionism was a security threat to the United States and a threat to international peace. Truman claims that containment of the soviet’s influence was the course of action needed to protect democracy and the free world. The Truman doctrine would later be argued as the start of the cold war. The response was split by critics expressing the concern that it was too aggressive and would cause problems …show more content…

He creates a logical argument of the possible threats that can arise if the soviet influence is not contained. He argued that the US was responsible for defending the value of democracy and freedom, he expressed that if we didn’t stop them nobody would. This is shown evidently when he claims, “the free people look to us for support in maintaining their freedoms”. This expresses the logical idea that if we don’t support them, democracy and freedom will lose. Truman also uses logos to establish the idea that the foreign policy exchange will have mutual benefits for both the United States and the other countries involved. Truman does this by claiming that “One of the primary objectives of the foreign policy of the United States is the creation of conditions in which we and other nations will be able to work out a way of life free from coercion”. This claim fully supports the audiences views no matter who they are, the United States people will collectively agree that they do not support coercion of any kind, this allows the audience to connect something they agree with to Truman’s argument which will further persuade them to accepting his doctrine. Truman used these forms of logos to appeal to the minds of the audience, this type of argument will be supported through his use of pathos which will use the opposite of logic and appeal to the audiences’

Show More
Related
649 Words | 3 Pages

During 1945-1990 the conflict between the Soviet Union and the United States completely dominated the United States’ foreign policy. The United States’ policymakers had to take care of places that were outside American territory, but relevant to the conflict. In order to compete with the Soviet Union after World War II, the US government decided to help the countries which were against Soviet Union. According to Document C, President Truman claimed to support people who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or outside pressure.

Read More
146 Words | 1 Pages

Soviet Union and United States wanted to put the halves back together, but had different ideas of how the government should be run, which caused tensions between the Soviet Union and the United States to escalate. The United States thought that the Soviet Union wanted to spread communism to surrounding nations. The United States focused on communism, to start, President Harry S Truman created a foreign policy called the Truman Doctrine to defend the Soviet's political pushes. With the policy established, the United States would contribute any forces or supplies needed to those nations under fire from outside and in-house forces. The plan was set to defend areas anywhere from Asia to Europe.

Read More
785 Words | 4 Pages

The United States took proper and a wise political response to perceive aggression from the Soviet Union both in Europe and Middle East. The United States came up with one of the most successful foreign policy, the "Truman doctrine". Communism started spreading around a good number of countries around Europe in countries like Hungary, Poland and Romania right after the World War II. This had gave the western world a big panic and there was one person who people always turned to, Truman was involved in this Europe affair he was the main “player” of the scene. The Truman Doctrine was announced by President Truman and was addressed to congress on March 12, 1947.

Read More
487 Words | 2 Pages

Truman’s Policy of “Containment” was made in March 1947.Truman’s Policy had economic, cultural, and political aspects. The Political aspect of his policy was the Truman Doctrine which said that the United States of America would support free peoples who are resisting subjugation by armed minorities or by outside forces or pressures. The cultural aspect of this doctrine was the freedom and choice government versus totalitarian and no choice government, so pretty much, you never got to choose anything and you were forced to do the things that the Soviet Union wanted you to do. Then lastly the economic aspect of this doctrine was the Marshall Plan which said that it would prevent countries from falling to communists and it would aid the Americans. The Marshall Plan also gave $17 billion to 16 countries(not the soviet union).

Read More
688 Words | 3 Pages

Furthermore, by pulling the threat of communism into the speech he finds another way to associate this faraway war with emotions that everyday Americans can relate to because of the mass amount of anti-communist propaganda happening since the end of the first World War. While the war, too many, seems far away, leaving most Americans unaffected, especially compared to WWII, Truman is able to tap into fear by making it seem more eminent a threat and more relatable. This

Read More
802 Words | 4 Pages

In the Truman Doctrine, Truman

Read More
614 Words | 3 Pages

Truman wanted to believe that we can support people in any country, he believed that everyone should be free to do what they wanted to do with in the laws. During World War two he was under pressure to decide if we were going to help. He wanted to help Greece and Turkey out and give them rights as citizens. He didn’t want to see the Soviet Union expand any further then it was. He wanted provide assistance to turkey and to Greece.

Read More
757 Words | 4 Pages

In other words, Truman suggests that the attack made by North Korea was part of a larger plan by communist China and, through extension, the Soviet Union. Truman believed that the Korean situation was similar to that of Greece in 1947. It was also clear that communism was a direct threat to the security of the Pacific area and to the United States performing its lawful and necessary functions. Preventing war or attack on the country was crucial in awaiting the restoration of security in the Pacific. Communist aggression was also a rising concern during

Read More
1642 Words | 7 Pages

The British then continued to help Greece quell the communist uprising in the country. However, when the British decided to withdraw their help in 1946 Greece feared a communist takeover. (Britannica,2) These factors led to the creation of the Truman Doctrine. The anti-capitalist ideas of Communism and the rising tensions in Turkey and Greece due to the soviet union and communism all led to the Truman Doctrine being necessary for America's foreign

Read More
1091 Words | 5 Pages

The Cold War had a huge impact on America’s foreign policy, this in turn changed how America was able to shape their relationship with other nations, as well as influencing military and economic strategies. The effects that The Cold War had on American foreign policy can be seen in The Truman Doctrine. In The Truman Doctrine, President Truman states, "I believe that it must be the policy of the United States to support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures”. Truman is expressing his belief that it is the responsibility of the United States to provide assistance and support to any country or group that is facing threats to its freedom and independence, whether from internal or external forces. The Cold War also had an effect on domestic politics in American society.

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

It’s notably argued that ridding both countries would’ve been proven effortless since America had the economical resources and weaponry to implement these solutions. Despite, having this advantage, Truman employs this rhetorical question to imply that this fix is presented as alarming/unsafe to both the country’s soldiers/citizens with the endangerment of America’s freedom being at stake. This frustrated his general, Douglass MacArthur since he believed executing this decision will only confine/tie Truman’s hands by prohibiting the bomb attack against these countries. Above all, Truman recognizes the importance of inspiring the American people instead of discouraging them from involving themselves in this conflict. By showcasing the pedestal on which America and other liberated countries stand, he utilizes an epistrophe to highlight each repeated phrase as it emphasizes the nations to “stand up and fight” and that he showcases them as “champions of

Read More
630 Words | 3 Pages

With this bomb we have added a new and revolutionary increase in destruction to supplement the growing power of our armed forces. In their present form these bombs are now in production and even more powerful forms are in development.” (Truman 1) By educating the audience, the audience can understand and have more knowledge about why the dropping of the atomic bomb was necessary for society and other countries. By stating repetition and tone, Truman can back up his claim that the atomic bomb saved more lives and shortened the

Read More
428 Words | 2 Pages

It can be argued that the end of World War II marked a new 'post-war world', and there was a need for effective international relations, and a discussion on reparations for Germany, and foreign policies. Conferences such as Potsdam, or Yalta, played significant roles in global relations, and marked a transitional period for the Cold War. President Harry S Truman made a speech, entitled the 'Truman Doctrine' to the United States Congress in March of 1947, regarding Soviet expansion and the "struggle against communism" in democratic states, namely the U.S. The Truman Doctrine speech stemmed from fear of Soviet expansion and Communist parties in Europe, especially Soviet pressure on Greece and Turkey. President Truman wished to prevent further expansion and adopt a policy of containment, involving an 'interventionist role' in Western Europe.

Read More
1743 Words | 7 Pages

Due to limited resources, interference in other regions, even if covered by the Truman Doctrine, was considered undesirable because China and Palestine were less important than the restoration of Europe. In addition, at this time, the Truman Administration is moving away from the doctrine of containing communism and moving on to a strategy of containing the Soviet Union. This was also part of the strategy in

Read More
886 Words | 4 Pages

It was a war between the past World War II Allies members, the Soviet Union and the U.S. (“Cold War History”). Many Americans were worried about the Russian leader, Joseph Stalin, and his rule over the communist Soviet Union (“Cold War History”). In turn, the Soviet Union resented the U.S. for not accepting that they were apart of the international community. They were also angry that the U.S. delayed their entry into World War II which resulted in the death of millions of Russians (“Cold War History”). President Harry S. Truman instituted the Truman Doctrine in 1947 stating that the U.S. would offer political, military, and economic assistance to all democratic nations that were under any threats (“The Truman Doctrine”).

Read More

More about Rhetorical Analysis Of The Truman Doctrine

Related Topics

Open Document