ipl-logo

Levinson's Theory Of Pragmatics

1285 Words6 Pages

Pragmatics is the study of the principles of the use of language in interaction. Austin, Searle and Grice are the three philosophers whose ideas provided the theoretical basis for pragmatics. It is concerned with the way in which the meaning of utterance changes in relation to the context of use, the time of interaction and goals of the interlocutors. It is the study of how during a social interaction people experience, make sense of and react to the way meaning is communicated. In other words, it can be claimed as the study of how utterances have meaning in various situations. Levinson defines utterance as ‘the issuance of a sentence, a sentence analogue or sentence fragment in an actual context’ (18). To simplify, utterance may be called …show more content…

Conversational Implicature is one of the crucial phenomena in Pragmatics. It is used to elucidate how interlocutors mean more than they express verbally and non-verbally. It facilitates understanding of unsaid meaning which the hearer is supposed to infer. Conversational implicatures arise out of the treatment of the maxims of Cooperative Principle. The maxims, namely the maxim of Quality, Quantity, Relation and Manner, are expected to be followed by the interlocutors. The maxim of Quality expects the sincerity on the part of the interlocutors, the maxim of Quantity expects adequate amount of information, the maxim of Relation refers to the relevance of the ongoing conversation and the maxim of Manner refers to the brevity and simplicity of the language used in conversation. In drama, when characters avoid communicating by way of pauses and silence, it seems to be the violation of the maxim of Quantity, thus giving birth to Conversational …show more content…

It is marked with characteristic Pinter silence and pauses. The action in the play is simple as well as shocking. Max is a butcher of about seventy years old. He lives in a large old house with two of his three sons - Lenny and Joey, and a brother Sam. Teddy is the eldest son of Max and Ruth is Teddy’s wife. At the beginning of the play, Pauses in the following piece of conversation are suggestive.
MAX: What have you done with the scissors? Pause.
I said I’m looking for the scissors. What have you done with them? Pause.
Did you hear me? I want to cut something out of the paper.
LENNY: I’m reading the paper.
MAX: Not that paper. I haven’t even read that paper. I’m talking about last Sunday’s paper. I was just having a look at it in the kitchen. Pause.
Do you hear what I’m saying? I’m talking to you! Where’s the scissors? (P. 7)
Here pauses implicate Lenny’s negligence as well as lack of respect towards his father, Max. It also throws light on the lack of proper communication between them.
RUTH: … I was born quite near here. Pause. Then … six years ago, I went to America. Pause. It’s all rock. And sand. It stretches … so far … everywhere you look. And there’s lots of insects there. Pause. And there’s lots of insects there. Silence. She is still. (P.

Show More
Related
521 Words | 3 Pages

It was when Liesel came down, however, that Max found himself interested in life again.” (Page 250). From the day Max left the Hubermann household in fear of being found, Liesel made sure to look

Read More
544 Words | 3 Pages

Through the implementation of various rhetorical strategies, sensory imagery, and eloquent phrasing, Leah Hager Cohen effectively depicts the predominant idea that despite the stereotypical assumption that the audibly impaired cannot possibly be normal, her grandpa is, indeed, quite normal. The author employs vivid sensory imagery strategically throughout the essay. By strategically, she applies the images meticulously in order to fortify her ideas. She writes, “He smacked his lips and sucked his teeth…” (2, 5-6).

Read More
1229 Words | 5 Pages

Also, Hans gave bread to the Jewish man, even though he knew that the Nazis would punish him, but he had to do what he knew was right. He was not a coward for standing up for the Jewish people. Liesel knew that harboring a Jew was extremely dangerous and against the law, but Liesel and Max both have lost people due to Hitler, so they had something to bond over. Rosa also shows courage by allowing her husband keep Max safe in their basement, and having a soft spot for Max, even though he is a

Read More
527 Words | 3 Pages

Hitler took many things away from Max, including his parents. Max’s book The Standover Man was about a “bird” (man) that was always being told what to do. Max helps Liesel to understand how he was treated, and that he was afraid of loosing his life. However, Liesel helps Max to understand that he should not be afraid of “The Standover Man”.

Read More
177 Words | 1 Pages

In Harrison Bergeron, people who are above average have to wear handicaps to make everybody equal Kurt Vonnegut used satire in Harrison Bergeron by exaggerating the people in this society in the future. One example is the handicaps that everybody who was “above average” had to wear. In this society, if you were very smart, you would have to wear a handicap in your ear that went off every 20 seconds, so he couldn’t think beyond the average human’s abilities. In this future world, the handicaps are supposed to make everybody equal. Some examples of handicaps would be weights you would wear if you are very strong, a mask if you are very pretty, spectacles with wavy lenses if you have great eyes.

Read More
102 Words | 1 Pages

: This passage is significant to the novel because it reminds the reader that no matter how much pain and suffering Liesel feels, she lives in a safer “world” than characters like Max. But death migrates from Liesel’s pain and travels to Max’s. Max has lost his entire family and faces persecution, but his true pain lies within him. He left his family to die; he is risking another family’s life, and is constantly belittled for being Jewish. This is why this quote is important, it shows the reader not only the physical, but mental pain that the citizens of Germany

Read More
456 Words | 2 Pages

What’s happening in the story is that Max is acting tough but he’s not. In paragraph 50/51 the text says The boys asked Max if he had been crying “Naw” he said “there was the water dripping from the tunnel roof but you said don’t move right?” “Well I was just being obedient.” This shows that this is important because it’s showing that he’s acting tough

Read More
466 Words | 2 Pages

- Liesel, knowing the outcome of running through a stream of Jews, wanted to find Max and see him for the last time before he would disappear for years. She wanted to see him and thank him for everything he 's done for her; the stories, the fun times they 've had. She willingly put herself in a bad situation because she loves him, and she knows that he loves her too. She knew that if Max saw her, it would make him the happiest

Read More
1437 Words | 6 Pages

“Thanks, Papa”(45-46). This quote is conveying that Liesel and Hans are having a friendly experience with each other through words, as Hans is teaching her the alphabet. This relates to the thematic statement because it demonstrates how the power of words can be shown in a positive way, and how they can express loving emotions toward people. Moreover, when Max falls ill and slips into a coma, Rosa presents Liesel with a gift from Max: When it came back out, she was holding Max Vandenburg’s sketchbook. “He said to give this to you when you were ready,” she said.

Read More
483 Words | 2 Pages

Both these protagonists happen to be political refugees avoiding Nazi persecution: Liesel’s parents were Communists and Max is a Jew. Max and Liesel alike have recurring nightmares about the last time they saw their families and these help Max and Liesel link themselves in areas where no one would understand their pain due to the loss of their family. Unlike most relationships theirs is based on their similar past and personalities as well as unspoken understanding along with the trust for each other. These similarities form a strong bond between Max and Liesel and this makes “The Standover Man”, a book compiled by Max using pages from “Mein Kampf” important, as Max helps Liesel realize that the power of words can be used to delight as well as harm others. “The best standover man I’ve ever known is not a man at all...”, a line within “The Standover Man” implies that Max believes that Liesel and he need each other and this friendship is unique to both of

Read More
860 Words | 4 Pages

The cast of the play are unaware of the audience, however, the audience is able to listen to dialogue that occurs throughout the theater, whether it is in the headsets between technicians, on stage between the actors playing their characters in the play and between the director and actors who make adjustments when necessary. The third fourth wall was at its edge of breaking, where the audience is almost unable to tell whether what they are experiencing is real or not. As an observer of the rehearsal of this play, this wall was broken when I understood that what I was watching was a rehersal of a play, of a rehearsal of a play. It was difficult to describe or understand when the cast of 10 out of 12 were actually in or out of character. The complexity of this play lies in the use of metatheatre, which has been exploited to its fullest extent

Read More
888 Words | 4 Pages

Everything Rudy does after that moment, when you know he’s going to die at the age of 14, everything is in the shadow of that.’ (Zusak, 2010). Max Vandenburg is the Jewish man who seeks refuge in the Hubermann’s basement putting their lives in great danger. Max’s father saved Hans’ life in World War II and caring for Max is Hans’ way of repaying Max for what his father did for him. Max and Liesel’s match of personalities and shared qualities enable the two to become such great friends, giving each other’s life purpose and the drive to survive the horrors of the war.

Read More
520 Words | 3 Pages

The Contrast of The Story of an Hour While Mrs. Mallard is just starting a new life, so to say, for herself, her life she has known comes to an end. She is just able to become “free, free, free!” (57) when she loses her life. Kate Chopin uses contrast with the news Richard’s gave, the way Mrs. Mallard felt in the room and the doctor’s news to show how women perceived marriage in the 19th century in her story The Story of an Hour.

Read More
2175 Words | 9 Pages

In this scene, Hans and Rosa are arguing, and Hans remembers the girl’s comment about his hair being like feathers, so he asks her to cut it for him. It shows a trusting between Max and Liesel for one of the first times, after a while of awkwardness and quietness. The third quote I chose was “‘Often I wish this would all be over, Liesel, but then somehow you do something like walk down the basement steps with a snowman in your hands’” (Zusak 313). Max is speaking to Liesel and telling her that, even though his life is incredibly hard, some people make it worth it.

Read More
767 Words | 4 Pages

“He - if there’s anything you ever need” (179). Hans Hubermann made a promise to Erik Vandenburg’s wife to help out in any way he could. He stuck to this promise and, consequently, agreed to house Max twenty years later. This shows how Hans kept to his promises and people could trust him. Housing a Jew in Nazi Germany could have lead to severe punishment, nevertheless, Hans decided to help Max in his time of need because he knew that he needed to stick to his commitment.

Read More

More about Levinson's Theory Of Pragmatics

Related Topics

Open Document