Teens experience a variety of situations outside of school and by banning them from reading this book is unnecessary. We shouldn’t hinder them from learning the possible havoc of having this
The novel should be restricted for the fact that parents are concerned about the sexual content and racism. In one segment of the book Richie and Lobel both fantasize about sexual experiences. Though early exposure to this book would be amazing for and male or female looking into joining the military. It is also a book that will leave you thinking and isn’t for everybody. The parents do know the children better and if they don’t want their child to be reading this book then that’s their choice but again, if their child is looking into joining the military this book is a must
but that just like movies parental guidance is suggested so it makes sense that it should be banned but not for someone older who wouldn’t get distracted from the overall message. Child molestation is another reason this book was banned. Jeannette Walls talks about living with different relatives of the family and one of them attempting to do stuff with her and another time trying to do stuff with her little brother. It is made clear in the book that this wasn’t acceptable behavior on the adults part so I understand and agree that it isn’t for those younger than the age of sixteen.
The promotion of underage drinking, the descriptive details of violence, and the sexual content in the book makes it highly inappropriate. The majority of young adults are not prepared to handle the situations mentioned in the novel. Most parents try their hardest to protect their children from these settings. Exposing young adults to these situations can result in problems because they are not emotionally mature. Society needs to be more sensitive to how this material can negatively affect a young person's development.
Statements like these along with other topics discussed in the novel, are important for teens to know the reality of. The book has been banned for its portrayal of subjects like drugs, drinking, and violence, but banning the book because of these topics pushes the belief that if kids don’t know about something, they won’t try it. This belief is not shared by everyone though, banning the book for that reason pushes political ideals onto people who may not support
WE ALL FALL DOWN Discuss the ways in which the author of a prescribed text constructs their novel to explore the way that people deal with trauma. Introduction We all fall down, written by Robert Cormier, is a young adult thriller which probes into the idea of how suffering trauma allows for psychological torture and the effects trauma has on every-day life. The novel follows the traumatic events each of the three main characters, Buddy Walker, Jane Jerome and Mickey Stallings (the Avenger).
“Censoring books that deal with difficult, adolescent issues does not protect anybody. Quite the opposite. It leaves kids in the darkness and makes them vulnerable. Censorship is the child of fear and the father of ignorance .
Anyone could be going through this exact thing but by taking away that right and freedom for someone to read something is absolute crap. Anyone can find anything wrong with something or not “healthy” for kids. Untimely it’s up to perception if you have lots of trouble with drug abuse and you read this book you can either say I’m going to smoke every day because Holden does this and blah blah my mom and this and that’s up to you, or you can see how this affected Holden in a negative way and ask for help. The problem is anyone can see negative in anything I could give you a child’s books and there could be references that might be ok for a kid but a four year old is not going to think about sex they are going to see a princess climbing a tower. If we say this book is banned because so and so says this, that is what we will see because when negative is pointed out that’s all one can think about.
Do you think teenagers should read a story that has killing or a lot of inappropriate content and violence? Others think it's good to have them read it but I think teens shouldn't be reading this because “The Call of The Wild” and “After an outpouring of literary outrage, N.C. Country Reconsiders Book Ban” prove to me that these books are bad.
The first reason to allow this novel to be read in public schools is because it is realistic. Without having knowledge of what smoking, drinking, etc. are and what they do to you're body, we as youth would not knowif it was okay to partake in those
“The state of kids publishing is such that it’s perfectly reasonable to be concerned about what agenda-driven and/or prurient content they’re peddling.” (Hemingway) This means it is very reasonable for everyone to be concerned about what the kids and young adults are reading. If parents are not concerned about what their child is reading, their child will follow many bad influences from books they have read. There are many influential books such as The Outsiders, by S.E Hinton that should be banned.
The poem ¨Kidnapped¨ by Shel Silverstein, is inappropriate for children because it depicts a child being attacked and kidnapped by strangers in a lie that the child told as an excuse for his absence at school; indirectly encouraging kids to lie. The boy makes up an elaborate lie to tell to his teacher and imprudent of what could come, ¨...shoved me in the backseat... ¨ ¨Tied my hands behind my back With sharp and rusty wire.¨ (8-11) This quote the boy being graphicly kidnapped and tied up by stangers on his way to school. This message is very gruesome and extreme for a child to endure, fortunately this is a lie.
This would also further play into the fear that a child would have due to the mature themes that they would not understand. To conclude, many kids would not understand the material presented in the book and start to have incorrect thoughts in their
A parent or the student should be the one who decided whether or not the book is appropriate. Also, when a child is sheltered from the world, a book with just a bit of adult material could help them understand what really happens. It could prepare them so when they do become older and get a job, the world doesn’t put them into complete shock. Taken from Common Reasons for Banning Books, “…it is important that the reader makes his/her judgments on the book.” To elaborate on this, another person shouldn’t tell a student what and what not to read.
Thermal imaging amends overtness of the objects in a dark environment by identifying the objects infrared radiation and then engendering an image predicated on temperature information. Near infrared illumination, low light imaging is withal most commonly used night vision technologies. Contrary to these two methods thermal imaging works in environments without any light. Thermal imaging can also penetrate obscurants such as smoke, fog and haze.
