Roger Ebert Value Of Life

717 Words3 Pages

Significance of Life
Hamlet and Roger Ebert have many differences in the views of life. The way Roger Ebert values life is he enjoy what he does which is rating movies and reviewing them. He doesn’t worry about the problems he had like him always having operations so the doctors can reconstruct his mouth. For example, in “The Essential Man” it shows many examples that show how much Ebert values his life like he is glad that he didn't die from cancer. And in the play of Hamlet almost every single part of it shows that hamlet doesn't value life as much as Roger Ebert does. I value life a lot because, compare to hamlet I don't have all the things he has but I'm still happy with what I have.
The differences that Ebert and Hamlet have on the views of life is Ebert really love his life and hamlet doesn’t love his life at some points in the play. Ebert loved his life a lot because what made him stronger was his confidence and his audience. Another example, is he wasn’t worried about the food he ate or what he drank, but how many words he can get out in time. Which means he only …show more content…

For example, I value my life a lot because I know I’ll become someone important in this world who will change the community and make it a better place doing good in life does give value to life because you are helping others in need. People who do bad in life like killing someone else their life are less valuable because they have taken away someone else’s life. In addition, I have a strong relationship with my family who they encourage me to become someone superior so I can have a better life than them so I don't have a rough life and work in the fields. Having strong family ties will get you anywhere in life because they are always supporting you. Having those ties will give you proper guidance and they will be honest with you. Not like Hamlet he didn’t get the proper guidance that’s why he is obsessed with killing his