Furthermore, Ronald Reagan started his argument with uses of word choices and appeals of emotions which creates strong feelings that effectively helps him to persuade the Soviet Union as well as the president Gorbachev. As he mentioned in paragraph two “standing before the Brandenburg gate, every man is a German, separated from his fellow man, every man is a Berliner forced to look upon a scar” here Reagan expressed the feeling of not being able to be connected to the other part of German. Those emotional appeal makes the Soviet Union to think about how the people were not connected to the other side of the berlin wall, which creates an eagerness inside them to bring down the
Soviet Union: What Should Textbooks Emphasize? The Soviet Union, or the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), was a transcontinental country that ran under an Authoritarian Communist regime. It was established by Vladimir Lenin in 1917 after the fall of the Russian Monarchy, and officially became the Soviet Union in 1922; The USSR eventually collapsed at the end of 1991 due to destructuring of its centralized government. The history of the Soviet Union is rich and can be difficult to break down. Trying to grasp the Soviet Union’s description for a textbook can be done by separating it into three categories.
Even though the Cold war ended, the influence of the Soviet Union didn’t. The Soviet Union grew out of the Bolshevik revolution and Civil war in 1917. The USSR was officially established in 1922. So what should textbooks emphasize about the Soviet Union? Well i feel that the three things that a chapter on the Soviet Union in a school textbook should emphasize the Culture, their military, and their economy, now let me explain why.
The Soviet Union has been an enigma, but still, a very significant contributor to the history of the world. There have been many rulers in Soviet Union history. The Soviet Union has been through economic successes and downfalls, ages of terror, a world war, was once an ally of the United States, today is an enemy of the US. If we were to add the history from the Soviet Union to our textbooks , what information should be emphasized? There are many important areas about the Soviet Union, three of them are: cultural achievements, military strength and political repression.
The Russian revolution resulted in the overthrow of the country’s monarchy and the establishment of the Soviet Union. It started off with many protests and strikes that forced Tsar Nicholas II out of power. As a result, a provisional government was put in place but it was weak and ineffective so the Bolsheviks took control and established a socialist government. The Bolshevik Revolution was caused by a combination of unstable and corrupt monarchies, unfair treatment of the populace, and a lagging industry, which eventually led to the creation of the USSR.
During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, leaders all around Europe were beginning to desire a stronger rule over their people. In numerous countries, absolutism was becoming a popular way to rule a nation, as it gave leaders the ability to have full control over their territory. Many believed that leaders became absolute through the power of God and divine right. However, rulers were able to gain power through military pursuits and well-controlled foreign relations. Therefore, international war gave leaders in Prussia, Russia, and Austria the foothold they needed to create absolute monarchies.
Back in the 20th century, Russia was a country known as the Soviet Union. On December 25, 1991, however, the Soviet Union came to an end. When the Soviet Union ended, the country was then renamed to Russia. In this essay, we will compare and contrast the Soviet Union with the current U.S and Russian governments. There are many differences between the Soviet Union and The Russian and U.S governments.
Karen Armstrong and Robert Thurman wrote their essays, “Homo religiosus” and “Wisdom”, respectively, describing two words, “being” and “void”. These words, although have opposite meanings, describe the same spiritual experience that come about through different means. By definition, “being” is a kind of fullness or completeness of existence and “void” is emptiness or a negation of existence. Armstrong believes that “being” is the equivalent of the Buddhist’s “Nirvana” while Thurman believes that “void” is the equivalent of the Buddhist’s “Nirvana”. Although these terms seem to be opposite in the literal sense of defining them, they lead to the same outcome: not being at the center of one’s own universe.
According to Sire (2009) nihilism is the denial of any philosophy or worldview. It is the negation of everything. Reflecting on this discussion and the thought provoking question of how a nihilist would answer the seven basic worldview questions assisted in my selection of three questions. The nihilist would view these question as non-existence.
Nihilism is a world view that consists of denial of everything thas is involved with life itself such as our purposes and meanings of life. In the book “The Universe Next Door” by James W Sire claims that “Nihilism is a denial of any philosophy or worldview, a denial of the possibility of knowledge, a denial that anything is valuable If it proceeds to the absolute denial of everything, it even denies the reality of existence itself” which is brought upon the cosmos because there is not any relativity with spirtuality. Some see nihilism as humans being their own concsious machine without no purpose in the end of it. Exisentialism is the worldview that every individual is on their own when it comes to their own decisions and choices and what they bring upon themselves for their purpose of life. In Existentialism there is no such thing as a “higher power” that is supposed to control what a persons life is and what its meaning of it, we are our own “higher power”.
Pratt A. (2017). Nihilism. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/nihilism/ [Accessed on April 12, 2017] Smith K. E (2010). Today’s Nihilism. Retrieved from https://posthistorical.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/today%E2%80%99s-nihilism-the-sound-and-fury-of-apathy/ [Accessed on April 12, 2017] Woodward A. (2002).
Although Sartre agrees with Dostoevsky who says, “If God does not exist, then everything would be possible,” he tries to pull back from nihilism by saying that each human must act “for all humanity” and before the audience of all of humanity. Sartre claims that all humans have no nature or essence, he disqualifies himself from calling them “all humans.” First Sartre affirms that human beings lack a nature, but if we lack a nature, then the term “human being” has no reference at all. The descriptive term that applies to something with inherent qualities and do what is required of the qualities can be identified as “human being”.
When Mikhail Gorbachev came on power in March 1985, he was determined to change and revitalize the whole country after many years of stagnation during Brezhnev’s ruling. He wanted to do this by modernizing and changing elite and the whole system in Communist Party by implementing reforms that were called Glasnost and Perestroika. What he actually wanted was end of Stalinist system and begin of socialist system that was truly democratic. Many saw Gorbachev’s way of ruling and enthusiasm as a threat for the Soviet Union, because they thought that it had lost its traditional discipline, organization, and ideology that provided a shell to the Soviet political order. Many would say that the Gorbachev’s reconstruction of the Soviet political and economic system did cost USSR of dissolution and did cause a fall of communism in Europe, but on the other side, there were many other causes that influenced on that before Gorbachev’s coming on power.
While the loneliness of nihilism has always been possible, it lacks dramatic potential. To find something is a very different story. Since its inception, science fiction has become the popular medium for portraying that something, the presence in the universe that challenges or confirms the anthropocentric presumptions of the great monotheistic civilizations of Western society. As Stanley Kubrick was fond of noting, the psychologist Carl Jung predicted that any encounter with transcendent intelligence would tear the reins from our hands, and we would find ourselves without dreams. We would find our intellectual and spiritual aspirations so outmoded as to leave us completely paralyzed.
“Ignorance is bliss” – Thomas Gray Ignorance is the opposite of knowledge. People who are ignorant do not care to gain knowledge due to their personal reasons. Many believed that knowing too much can induce stress. It is true to an extent. When we know a lot of things, we think more before doing.
