ipl-logo

Ronald Dworkin's Prudent Insurance Approach To Universal Health Care

1511 Words7 Pages

Ronald Dworkin argues that the prudent insurance approach provides justice in health care and is a satisfactory method of providing universal health care in America. This is in contrast to the rescue principle, which, according to Dworkin, is completely inadequate and has done more harm than good. Here, I respond to Dworkin’s argument by pointing out an issue with prudent insurance. The prudent insurance approach fails to consider the fact that there are different types of health care needed by different people depending on their age and gender. If this point is taken into consideration, it becomes evident that the prudent insurance approach is flawed. In Dworkin’s paper, he looks for an answer to the question of how we, as a country, can develop a society in which health care is available to everyone. He briefly mentions the health care plan developed by President Clinton. This plan introduced the idea of health care rationing, in which everyone would have access to a basic health care package. However, treatments would be rationed depending on whether or not they were deemed “necessary and appropriate” by a National Health Board (SLA pg. 240). This health care plan failed however as it was considered to be too complex and poorly developed. Some argue that no universal health care plan …show more content…

He encourages the reader to imagine a society in which wealth is equally distributed, everyone has the same knowledge about medical treatments that doctors have, and no one, including insurance companies, has any knowledge about the likelihood of a person contracting a particular disease or illness. While this society would be ideal, it is well known that our society is imperfect and unjust (SLA pg. 243). Yet, these corrections were still used as guidelines to decide what health care should be provided to everyone, and attain justice in health

Show More
Related
526 Words | 3 Pages

One of the longest standing debates in the U.S. has been a universal health care system for the nation. Supporters for such a system have argued that it would bring down costs and increase access to care, while opponents said it would be too expensive and would reduce the quality of care. The Affordable Care Act of 2010 is one key controversial attempt to bring a form of health care to America. Proponents from both sides of the argument have presented editorials of their opinions with varying degrees of objectivity with several types of evidence. Supporters of the system have often quoted a need for fair and equal coverage for all.

Read More
1605 Words | 7 Pages

A Call for a Single Payer Universal Health Care System As the 2016 Presidential Elections draw near, the topic of much debate is that of healthcare. Some candidates vow for universal healthcare and mandate health insurance for all, while others believe that tax credits and health savings accounts will resolve the current crisis. Consequently, the nation has been divided on which plan to support and move forward with. Some fear universal health care will diminish the quality of care and lead to long waits, while others fear that health savings accounts and tax credits won’t be enough to insure all and will do little to diminish the administrative costs of the current system. Ultimately because healthcare is a basic right that should be guaranteed

Read More
1551 Words | 7 Pages

While the Obama administration argued for the mandate by utilizing traditional reasoning such as the creation of a negative externality, that analysis alone does not address the economic and moral significance of the mandate properly. With respect to the individual mandate, there needs to be a societal paradigm shift toward a Rawlsian ideal state with respect to health care. In this state, there is an equal distribution of primary social goods, and any upward movement from this baseline is justifiable so long as the result works to everyone’s advantage (with a particular focus on the less well off). While it is true some of us are predisposed to conditions or we lack preventative care, unequal distribution of health causes unequal distribution of opportunities. People are more likely to be caught in a cyclical poverty loop if they are unable to retain any after-tax income if they are unable to overcome their ailment due to lack of access to care or the inability to subsequently escape poverty because of medical expenses.

Read More
591 Words | 3 Pages

The author refers to two “solutions” to universal health care; the public solution and the private solution. The public solution, also known as the single payer system, would be a program paid for by taxes. The private solution would be a mix of public solution supporters and supporters of more private businesses working together. Personally, the author believes the public solution would work best. Bodenheimer then goes on to explain the differences between the two solutions in further detail as a method of showing why he believes the public solution is

Read More
795 Words | 4 Pages

On the one hand, the expansion in coverage has paved the way for high quality and affordable healthcare for millions of Americans who could not afford the same. In Obamacare’s Ups And Downs, As Seen by a Republican Doctor, Francine Kiefer informs her readers that since the ACA, national statistics showed that a record low of “8.6 percent of people” did not have health insurance by the first quarter of 2016 (par.20). In South Tucson, Arizona, a “$5 million federal grant” to the El Rio Community Health Center set the foundations on which the people could access the same level of health care they could if they had access to private practices (Kiefer par.23). That is so despite the truth that most of the patients [60%] “live at or below the federal poverty line” (Kiefer par.23). On the contrary, and in an undeniable liability, there is the mandate that all persons ought to “carry health insurance” (Kleinke par.6).

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

The nature of the current debate surrounding the implementation of universal healthcare in America is troubling because it is comprised almost entirely of pragmatic arguments void of concern for the principles behind the project. Before one asks how much a thing will cost, how it will be organized, or whether “the uninsured” will benefit, one should ask whether enacting universal healthcare is in keeping with the values and principles of the American experiment. In other words, is universal healthcare good for America? Universal healthcare is not good for America.

Read More
644 Words | 3 Pages

The current debate concerning the implementation of universal healthcare in America is hard to understand because it is comprised most of practical arguments of concern for the motives behind the project. Before one asks how much it will cost, how it will be organized, or whether “the uninsured” will benefit, they should ask whether implementing universal healthcare is best for keeping with the values and principles of the American way. In other words, is universal healthcare good for America? Universal healthcare is not good for America.

Read More
1202 Words | 5 Pages

Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God Analysis Religion has unquestionably shaped the structure of the United States from the founding of the first colonies on the eastern coast to modern political disputes. The roots of its grasp upon american society can be tied back to settlements in the east for the purpose of establishing strict religious communities. Although many continued to hold onto older religious beliefs as the colonies progressed, american colonies began to drift from the stern ideals which were held by the colony’s founders. In fear of allowing the colonies to become involved in “worldly matters”, movements such as the Great Awakening arose. In this campaign, many ministers sought to instill fear upon those they believed to be

Read More
1185 Words | 5 Pages

Over the late years the quantities of uninsured Americans has fundamentally expanded. The 2.2 million late development of uninsured is for the most part because of age and salary changes. At that, most Americans trust that protection scope and access to human services framework are the issues that ought to be organized, and it is the immediate obligation of the central government to guarantee restorative watch over those natives that need protection, even through raising expenses. Today, the US society confronts the continuous problem of "whether the administration ought to make a noteworthy or a constrained push to give medical coverage to the uninsured" (The Henry J. Keiser Family Foundation 1). On the other hand, no choice has yet got

Read More
1195 Words | 5 Pages

America's Healthcare Accessibility Despite the fact that millions of Americans struggle to get the essential medical treatment, access to healthcare is a fundamental human right. This essay explores the reasons in favor of universal healthcare in the United States and responds to criticisms that draw attention to issues of cost and government intrusion. In addition to being morally required, ensuring universal access to healthcare in America is crucial for advancing public health, minimizing healthcare inequalities, and establishing economic stability. The advantages of providing all people with access to healthcare greatly outweigh the drawbacks, which is why it is critical to adopt policies that emphasize equitable healthcare provision. Opponents

Read More
950 Words | 4 Pages

“Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” are all unalienable rights(Dec. Of Ind.). This phrase does not seem to accommodate those who our capitalistic society deems indigent. Repudiating about 44 million people’s “right” to healthcare and another 38 million people’s “right” to adequate healthcare is a hypocrisy (PBS). Realizing the discrepancy between the ethics of our country and its execution is the point everyone misses.

Read More
741 Words | 3 Pages

Healthcare in the United States is in desperate need of reform. There are several rationales to further explain this proposition. As an illustration, the Declaration of Independence states our unalienable rights: life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. In other words, every individual should be entitled to healthcare as it preserves life and promotes the general welfare. The federal government should, therefore, enact a program of universal health to better protect and serve all of its citizens.

Read More
1136 Words | 5 Pages

As Bernie Sanders once said, “Health care must be recognized as a right, not a privilege.” Most developed countries choose to live by this quote while the United States of America chooses to go against it. Universal health care has benefits on multiple levels, whether it’s a single individual or the people in a whole. The U.S is one of the few developed countries that doesn’t offer universal health care to their people, yet the U.S spends more than seventeen percent of their GDP on health insurance. Many people believe that universal health care is a simple one solution problem, but the truth is that there are multiple forms of universal health care that provide all citizens with the health insurance they need.

Read More
727 Words | 3 Pages

Health care should not be considered a political argument in America; it is a matter of basic human rights. Something that many people seem to forget is that the US is the only industrialized western nation that lacks a universal health care system. The National Health Care Disparities Report, as well as author and health care worker Nicholas Conley and Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP), strongly suggest that the US needs a universal health care system. The most secure solution for many problems in America, such as wasted spending on a flawed non-universal health care system and 46.8 million Americans being uninsured, is to organize a national health care program in the US that covers all citizens for medical necessities.

Read More
268 Words | 2 Pages

There has always been a debate about health care and how it should be handled. People argue that there should be a universal health care program, because many can not afford healthcare. Many also argue that there should not be because it would be to expensive and would not provide good care. Both articles argue for each side of the debate.

Read More

More about Ronald Dworkin's Prudent Insurance Approach To Universal Health Care

Related Topics

Open Document