Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Unhealthy food in the school system
Unhealthy food in the school system
Unhealthy school food
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Unhealthy food in the school system
Unhealthy food in the school system
Unhealthy school food
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Ensuring and encouraging schools to offer more fruits and vegetables to the students is a way of incorporating these foods into a child’s daily diet. There are a number of articles written on fast food consumption and obesity. A study performed in Michigan on fast food and obesity states , “the main reason that Michigan adults go to fast-food restaurants is that they are quick and convenient (64%). Over eating and unhealthy eating may result in obesity and other medical health problems. Fast food is high in fat content and calories and gives that temporary full feeling making it easy and convenient.
Ariana Cha combats a seriously pressing topic in her writing. While many articles are very quick to bash the school lunch program, while this article can enforce it. Cha is supporting the most common argument with the school lunch program, nutritional content. Cha is stating that the nutrients are offered, but are not being accepted by the students. The audience intended for this reading is, literally, anybody that disagrees with the provided meals.
Intro Name: Natasha Torres In the nonfiction article, “ Are Our School Lunches Healthy Enough?” by McClatchy-Tribune News Service. This article is about how the first lady wants to change school lunches to be healthier for children although the school nutrition do not like her campaign. Michelle Obama’s program should be banned because the school’s lunch is already healthy enough for example, some people are grossed out by the school lunches, some are disappointed, and some say parent can not be trusted.
Chapter six goes on to talk about hunger and how we see it in schools. Finally, chapter eight focuses on changing the school food system and introducing healthier options. The first section to be reviewed is chapter five. This chapter talks about the factors of why children may choose to stay away from school food. The main factors include quality and variety of food, time available for eating, cafeteria environment, price, alternatives, and the stigma attached to free and reduced lunch.
In the article, “Are Our School Lunches Healthy Enough?” by Rice William, the author question whether our school lunches are healthy enough. He discusses the Hunger-Free Kids Act, a campaign originated from first lady, Michelle Obama, in 2010 to help fight childhood obesity, which affects 1 in 3 Americans . It can escalate into diabetes and heart disease, which can make a childs life worse and cost the nation millions.
Also, they believe that they should stick to the menu that they have now because the school would be better off making more money on the regular lunch menu, other than than healthier lunch menu that they want to give us. However, students need to be more healthier and stop stuffing their faces with junk food that is not good for them and that is causing severe health conditions. The lunch menu consists of: Blue Raspberry slushies, Hot cheetos, Chicken patties, nice big juicy Hamburgers, Fried chicken, greasy French fries, Grape and Orange sodas, etc. The lunch menu we have is not very healthy at all. The lunch menu that we need to consist of: Mixed Salad, Orange juice, Apple juices, Fruits, Baked chicken, more vegetables ,and sell less snakcs.
In the newspaper article, “No Lunch Left Behind,” by Alice Waters and Katrina Heron, the authors inform the audience, “But food distributed by the National School Lunch Program contains some of the same ingredients found in fast food and the resulting meals routinely fail to meet basic nutritional standards. Yet this is how the government continues to ‘help’ feed millions of American schoolchildren, a great many of them from low-income households”(4). Waters and Heron argue school programs provide unhealthy food on a daily basis, which accustom the students to not having a choice, yet to eat it and not starve. Students may not realize that the food being served is technically as bad as going to a junk food restaurant. The fast food industry is constantly improving everything to get people to come back and order the “new,” that will benefit them in many ways.
Imagine a school cafeteria with delicious food, healthy lunches, and all on a small budget. Now imagine that same cafeteria but with not delicious, not nutritious food, and tons of money wasted. Which would you choose? Unfortunately, prairie elementary school’s cafeteria is much like the latter. Both the taste and nutritional value of this food is very bad.
Some say change is essential for growth while others proclaim it as a necessity of life. Throughout the nation, certain school districts have pondered upon promoting a new variety of cafeteria foods focusing on the outlines of health and nutrition, a debate strongly valued by the likeness of public officials. As health defections soar into a national concern, students and school systems evolve into actions of reform, regulating dietary consumption and improving standards of civil welfare. Overall, varying school lunch menus throughout the region is a necessary assessment to student bodies and communities because it stimulates learning performance and interaction, creates a variety for all, and even promotes change throughout the community, naming this a policy for the win. Performance is dominated through wisdom and
For all the cuts that have been made to school foods, six percent has not been a big decrease. School lunches don’t provide any nutritional value for the kids. The purpose for a school lunch is to provide kids with a dependable lunch that has good proportional amounts and nutrition value. The obesity rates need to drop higher and faster in the next ten years if they want to make cuts out of our meals and the meals need to be proportioned to size.
Look back at what you ate at school and ask yourself if it is healthy. Is there healthy alternatives to school lunch? Is there a variety of choices to choose from? Are there any vegetarian choices for the students? These are just some of the basic questions you would ask yourself when thinking about the risks of school lunches.
In the year 2010, President Barack Obama and the First Lady Michelle Obama created the “Hunger-Free Kids Act” of 2010, which has created problems among students. In the year 2012, Michelle Obama also created the “Let’s Move Campaign” in order to reduce childhood obesity, and to give students access to healthy food in their school lunches. The “Hunger-Free Kids Act” means that no student should go hungry, and the “Let’s Move Campaign” makes the lunches healthier. Unfortunately, due to the quality and quantity of the meals that the students now receive, more kids are refusing to eat school lunches, and remain hungry during school hours. Not only does this outrage students, it also infuriates parents, teachers and staff as well.
Now is the winter of our discontent. In the Post Dramatic Production, The Tragedy of King Richard III by The La Boite theatre company, the same statement is posed. Using the famous first line of the original playwright by Shakespeare named Richard III the production questions the audience as to whether the meaning of the original play is still relevant for a 21st century audience and questions if something bad were to happen in front of us now what we would do about it. The show looks at how a psychopath is made, sitting in between the shakespearean representation of King Richard III, and who King Richard III really was. Taking a four-hundred-year old story, the La Boite theatre company effectively illustrated to the audience their understanding and thoughts on the original playwright and then expressed their modern interpretation through a discerning execution of characterisation, manipulation of tension and dramatic design in which aimed to engage the modern audience.
To begin with, the taste alone of school lunches is beyond unsatisfactory. The meals provided by public schools are not appetizing. There exists a tangible disconnect between the enticing, nutritious meals advertised on the school board’s menus and what the students actually receive—pathetic portions and lukewarm meals slapped onto a tray. Children’s complaints about school lunches are often seen as trite. However, while common, they are not any less accurate.
In some schools some principals superintendents have made a decision to opt out of the Healthy choice foods and make there own semi-healthy foods that kids like. To reduce waste and bring back students who have opted to pack a lunch or go off campus for fast food, his districts cafeterias have installed stir-fry stations with abundant vegetables so students can have meals made to order. and he’s added spice bars so kids can even the bland. In schools some principals and administrators are starting to take action.