ipl-logo

School Lunch

620 Words3 Pages

In most places, many love eating their favorite foods. The elimination of students' favorite foods in their school, causes the restlessness of student. They would question the healthy new lunch menu and start complaints about it with the cafeteria. Changing the menu would also cause less students to eat the new alternative lunch, cafeteria workers may lose their jobs, and causes the lessening of decision making. As most parents know, their children would pick their favorite foods over a healthy alternative. This does not happen only in people's homes, but also in the educational system. Many students love to enjoy their favorite foods after a long day's work. With their favorite foods getting replaced, the students might not bother buying school lunch, causing the school to lose …show more content…

Following the "Cause and Effect" theory, the change of school lunch has a negative effect regarding cafeteria workers. It is their job to serve the students lunch for the whole of lunchtime. As less students buy lunch , the need of cafeteria workers diminishes. The school board will then have no choice but to remove them from their jobs. With the loss of their jobs, the workers will then have no choice but to look for another working environment. In some cases the loss of a job may cause the loss of a home. The workers may be forced to sell their homes or end up becoming homeless. Some may live with family members, but for those who have no choice, living on the streets would be the only option for them. The ability for people to make decisions makes up who they are. With bad decisions comes a bad consequence, but good decisions makes a better person. By eliminating students' favorite foods there is less room for decision making in the schools. The students would have no say in whether they want to have healthy foods or not. Because they did not agree to the decision the school made, being adolescents, they would want to rebel against the new policy and start

Open Document