They then realized what they had discovered, they saw the torture chamber holmes used to kill his victims. Holmes was first charged with insurance scams and then later on he was charged for first degree murder of Benjamin Pitezel.
Mr. Bennett should be found not guilty of the murder of Mr. Adams because there is reasonable doubt. Mr. Bennett went into the kitchen to check on Mr. Adams. when he was lying on the ground with spilled coffee all around his body. When Mr. Adam went into the kitchen to go get some cream and sugar, but there was rat poison by the cream and sugar and it looked alike and Mrs. Swanson testified that he had bad eyesight. That Mr. Bennett wouldn't go into the kitchen to go check on Mr. Adams because he would already know that he was dead.
Schoenborn not criminally responsible for the murder of his children is undisputable and an appropriate decision based on the evidence and the administration’s objectives. The actus reus of the case cannot be disputed, as the accused confessed to the crime and both the defence and the crown agree that Mr. Schoenborn killed his children. However, the mental element of the crime is arguable, as the possibility of Mr. Schoenborn being in a psychotic state during the time of the offence is high. The evidence to support the fact that he did not form the mens rea of the crime can be derived from his history of mental illness as well as the evidence given by Ms. Clarke that he was a good and caring father. This demonstrates that he greatly cared for his children and their safety but was prone to having psychotic episodes that muddled his mind and led him to commit dangerous and unusual acts.
(151) This was a way for Holmes both to get the pleasure of murder and capitalize on the death. Holmes would
Dear Jury Members:Mr.Bennett should not be found not guilty of murder because reasonable doubt is found. Although the prosecution thinks that Mr.Bennet is guilty for murder, they are wrong because since Mr.Alfario is an exterminator he had access to the poison that killed Mr.Adams, Mrs.Reid thought that when Mr.Adams died that she would inherit all his wealth, and the reason Mr. Bennett had poison on his hands because he had touched the puddle of coffee while checking Mr.Adams pulse on accident. To begin, Mr Bennett is not guilty because Mr Alfario had access to the poison, the same poison that killed Mr.adams. The police found out that Mr.Adams had died from rat poisoning and a coffee cup was found by Mr.Adams’s dead body, the cup contained rat poison.
Holmes is found guilty with the murder in the first degree. He has the penalty of dying by hanging. While waiting for death, he says he had committed 27 murders. Henry Webster Mudgett met his demise on May 7,1896. It is unsure how many people Holmes has killed, but it is definite that he had killed 9 people.
In “Smoker’s Get a Raw Deal”, Stanley S. Scott argues that smokers are being discriminated against, and being able to smoke wherever they like is a right that is being taken away. This argument is not effective. One reason is that it is stated at the end of the article that the writer, Stanley Scott at the time was the vice president of the tobacco company Philip Morris. This creates a bias in his argument since he is likely to favor smoking. Which can lead to leaving out certain details in order to sway the readers toward smoking.
Furthermore, Holmes did not keep the bodies of his victims like many other murderers, he found no gratification from it. What Holmes yearned for and felt pleasure from was feeling a sense of possession over his victims as they begged for mercy, and unfortunately once they died that feeling quickly dissipated. As a result, Holmes’s desire for power and control could never be fully satisfied and because of this he feels the need to kill again and again. After reading this passage I felt repulsed at the fact that Holmes murdered solely to gain pleasure from the sense of power and possession he felt. It is disgusting to envision Holmes standing there, with a menacing look on his face, enjoying the control he exerts over his victims as they die, slow, painful deaths.
ARTICLE: WHO IS THE TRUE CAUSE OF ROMEO & JULIET'S DEATH? Romeo Montague, Juliet Capulet, and Count Paris were found dead in Juliet's tomb. When things go wrong it is easy for people to point fingers at others. Find someone to blame for tragic accidents, mistakes, and crimes. At the scene of this crime when the three bodies were found lying in the tomb other suspects were found lurking: The page, Friar Lawrence, and Balthasar.
Was Friar Laurence the one to blame for the death of Romeo and Juliet? Romeo and Juliet, a play written by William Shakespeare, concerns two lovers from two feuding families, the Capulets and the Montagues. Throughout the story, many characters contributed problems leading to the death of the two lovers, Romeo and Juliet; however, I believe Friar Laurence had the most responsibility in this issue. Friar Laurence was a monk and a counselor who came up with underhanded plots in order to help the two star-crossed lovers succeed with their love. Unfortunately, these plots led Romeo and Juliet into wrongdoings and unwanted deaths.
If certain characters had thought or acted differently at certain points of the play, could the Star-Crossed lover’s deaths been prevented? In the play, The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare, Lord Capulet and Friar Laurence are the individuals responsible for the death of Romeo and Juliet. The tragedy is about two young adults that fall in love, which ultimately leads to their doom. Their deaths cause the altercation between Lord Capulet and Lord Montague to end. Throughout this wild plot, Lord Capulet and Friar Laurence’s actions are to blame for Romeo and Juliet’s death.
For example, with the death penalty, law officials are sometimes apathetic to whom received it and are lazy to change the charge. He writes, “The death penalty is not about whether people deserve to die for the crimes they commit. The real question of capital punishment in this country is, Do we deserve to kill?” (27). Throughout his novel, Stevenson unveils his certain ideas regarding the death penalty, and it all leads back to a question of humanity and where morals lie.
Roylott’s passing, though the detective felt no remorse concerning this fact. Dr. Roylott was a despicable man, whose numerous crimes created an abhorrence between him and Sherlock Holmes. While the detective did despise Dr. Roylott, the death was still an accident, as Sherlock Holmes could not predict the snake would end up biting its master, only to have its venom kill him just seconds later. Finally, it was Dr. Roylott’s own choice to continue to send the snake through the ventilator, even when he was aware he was suspected of the murder. In the end, Dr. Roylott eventually met the unfortunate fate he rightfully deserved; the hero Sherlock Holmes could not possibly feel any guilt towards this
Though some readers might believe that Friar Laurence is innocent in the death of Juliet, it is clear that Friar Laurence is actually responsible for her death. 1 He gave Juliet the potion and this was his plan. 2 He never told Friar John how important delivering the letter to romeo was. 3
Poirot then, suggests that instead of taking the case to the police, Sheppard take his own life, saying, “The truth goes to Inspector Raglan in the morning. But for the sake of your good sister, I am willing to give you the chance of another way out. There might be, for instance, an overdose of a sleeping draught. You comprehend me?” This is quite an uncomfortable scenario as the detective not only names the criminal and the crime, but also administers the punishment by himself which also serves the purpose of maintaining his own status as sole knower of the privileged information, wherein we watch him playing a direct part in the punishment of the sinner.
