More handpicked essays just for you.
Was President Harry Truman justified in dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Truman's justification for bombing japan
Was President Harry Truman justified in dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Was President Harry Truman justified in dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki
But he had no compelling reason to do so. The bomb provided a promising way to bring about a prompt Japanese surrender without the disadvantages of other alternatives, and in Truman’s mind, its use did not require a lengthy consideration” (Walker pg. 96). After the bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, people decided that the bombs were actually required. The people thought that if the bombs weren’t dropped, thousands of American lives would have died while America invaded Japan. The problem with this logic is that many people died in those bombings.
Name: Course Instructor: Class: Date: Critical Book Review: Prompt and Utter Destruction Introduction Within weeks, word on the US dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki began to spread that the main reason behind the bombs was to save the lives of Americans (Bernard). It was put that hundreds of thousands of American military causalities were saved through the bombings.
Although Fussell admits that the bomb was a “most cruel ending to that most cruel war”, and that those who claim that the use of the atom bomb was wrong are simply attempting to “resolve ambiguity” concerning the ethics of war, he believes that the bomb was, without doubt, necessary. Using mainly statistics and accounts of soldiers, Fussell introduces several compelling figures. First, he reveals that for the anticipated Allied invasion of Japan, “one million American casualties was the expected price“. Secondly, Fussell tells us that “Universal national kamikaze was the point” which means that every man, woman, and child in Japan would have been prepared to sacrifice their life in defense of the homeland. If this suicidal loyalty is taken into consideration, it seems that the loss of Japanese life upon the invasion of the mainland would have far outweighed the actual loss of life that occurred when Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed.
This image shows how big of a threat and danger Japan is- it also shows how important it is to bring Japan down. The atomic bombs are justified because of Japan’s aggressions towards U.S. The United States’ use of atomic bombs on Japan is justifiable because it saved thousands of American lives; the Japanese were given fair warning, and their aggressions towards the U.S.
WWII-Atomic Bomb Thousands and thousands of kids, families gone in seconds from one bomb that was ordered to hit the enemy forces by the United States president. The U.S had a tough decision to make when fighting the second world war and when the first know thing was made called the atomic bomb. The question is, was president Truman justified in dropping the two atomic bombs and killing thousands of lives in a blink of an eye to end the war? Truman wasn’t justified in dropping the bomb because of all the lives that had to be sacrificed. If he just stuck to the original plan and kept going from island to island then maybe less lives would of been taken.
Did you know that WWII invented things like synthetic rubber, the Jeep, the atomic bomb, and even duct tape? We use almost all of these things daily. Japan was getting desperate to the point that they blew up the U. S. Naval base Pearl Harbor and they had Kamikaze planes fly directly into the U.S. ships. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a military necessity because America would have lost more lives if the war continued, and America was tired of fighting. America would have lost more lives in WWII if the bomb had not dropped because in six years there were 405,399 casualties.
A former Ohio representative, Dennis Kucinich in the web article, We Didn’t Have to Drop The Bomb published on the 70th anniversary of the Japan bombings addresses the topic of the use of the atomic bomb and passionately argues that the use of nuclear weapons were not necessary in order to capitulate Japan by listing many quotes from high ranking government officials and giving his own personal opinion. Kucinich supports his claim by using factual quotes from credible sources such as Admiral William Leahy, who believed in that Japan would have surrendered without the use of atom head of staff; therefore, proving to the audience that others also believe in his cause. The author’s overall purpose of writing this article is to persuade the American
Nagasaki was a strategic place to drop the bomb because of the torpedo plant, but Hiroshima only had a military base, so why drop on Hiroshima? Therefore, was the United States’ decision ethical and fair to the
On August 6th, 1945, The United States bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki killing many people. The president at the time, President Truman said that he only wanted to use the bomb in military warfare because it would hurt women and children. The bombing at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was morally incorrect because the Japanese were ready to surrender, it was a crime against humanity, and it affected their physical self. The bombing at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was unsuitable because the Japanese were ready to surrender.
Imagine living in a period in which the realities of war encased the world, and the lethal potential to end all suffering was up to a single being. During World War II, tensions between Japan and the United States increased. Despite pleas from US President, Harry Truman, for Japan to surrender, the Japanese were intent on continuing the fight. As a result, Truman ordered the atomic bomb, a deadly revolution in nuclear science, to be dropped on the towns of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. President Harry Truman, in his speech, “Announcement of the Dropping of the Atomic Bomb,” supports his claim that the dropping of the A-bomb shortened the war, saved lives, and got revenge by appealing to American anger by mentioning traumatic historical events and
However, it is also true that the bombs led to Japan’s surrender, saving countless lives that would have been lost in a land invasion or continued war. Critics may say that Truman’s decision was unnecessary, as Japan was already on the brink of surrender. However, this argument ignores the fact that Japan had not officially surrendered and there was a significant resistance within the Japanese military to surrender. It also fails to consider the potential consequences of a land invasion, which would have been devastating for both American and Japanese forces. In other words, Truman’s decision to drop the bombs was also criticized for its humanitarian consequences.
On 6 August 1945, the first ever atomic bomb to be dropped on foreign soil was released from Enola Gay on Hiroshima in Japan. The nuclear bomb ‘Little Boy’ was dropped as a disastrous attack in an attempt to make the Japanese surrender to America, and destroyed Hiroshima where over 70,000 people were killed instantaneously. When the Emperor of Japan refused to acquire the United States' (U.S./USA) terms of surrender, the U.S. Dropped their second atomic bomb, 'Fat Man' over Nagasaki on August 9th, 1945. Many people despise the use of the atomic bombs, including myself, as the mass murder of civilians is a cruel, uncalled for, sadistic act. The point of this investigation is to determine whether America's decision to drop the Atomic Bombs
The article ends with how the U.S was successful in it’s use of the atomic bomb to force Japan’s surrender in World War II. This article is relevant to my thesis, because it helps me learn about what made the the Japanese surrender, and how the violence from the Americans veered their decisions to compromise with them. It provides me valuable insight on the American government's thought process and plan to destroy Japan, as well as evidence on how massive the atomic bomb really was and how much it impacted the Japanese. This article is very trustworthy because it is the exact words of the secretary of war on February 1947; Henry L.Stimson. Also, the source is reliable because it is from a popular database and greatly worked with and used by many
The atomic bomb being justified or unjustified raises several issues and ethical questions. It is argued that the bombings helped minimise the struggle of further WW1, as well as saving thousands of lives that could have suffered in the camps of the Japanese. As well as how there could have been a different solution to the bombing. The dropping of atomic bombs killed many civilians, women, children, and the aged, and it brought about lasting issues for survivors. The brief-time period outcomes of the bombing had been explosive and violent, with an estimated hundred and forty,000 people and seventy-four,000 human beings losing life in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, respectively.
To think of the Second World War is to think of a very strategic game of chess. The objective is not to beat your opponent simply through fierce head on offense, but to understand the power of a well-planned defense. What moves can you make to keep them in check, how can you determine the threat of your opponent’s next move? The decision to drop the atomic bombs on the cities of Nagasaki and Hiroshima were just that, a strategic chess move. I argue that the decision to drop the Atomic bombs in Japan were necessary in order to end the war in the pacific, but to also to detour the impending invasion of Japan by the Soviets.
