Should Electoral College Be Abolished Essay

The Electoral College, created by our founding fathers, is a well thought out system, created for the well-being of our country. Well-educated Electors are chosen because they fit certain qualifications and were elected to help keep the voting system more organized, so abolishing the Electoral College would not be the right thing to do. This process helps give equal opportunity to both the large and small states, and if it was abolished, it would do more harm than it would do good. Thus, the Electoral College should not be abolished because it gives equality to all states, whether they are large or small, the founding fathers introduced this process to us for the well-being of our country, and the Electors are more educated than most voters,

The Electoral College was a part of the federal plan that our forefathers set for the American people. While it made a place for the stars, as well as the people living in them, by giving them a say in the Federal process and preventing bigger cities from taking over in the presidential election, opponents believe that this is not the case. Even after difficulties that the United States has been through, the states have control over a large number of laws, management, and finance which impact the lives of citizens. Each and every state has their own political cultures, ways of behaving and traditions that continue regardless of our short-term population, a connected economy and news media. The Electoral College was meant to be a way to solve the problems with one large state dominating over another small state based on the population. They wanted everyone to have a say in the decision to elect a president of their country. Therefore, the Electoral College should not be abolished because it is not what our Founding Fathers wanted for the United States in the first

The constitution states that the Electoral College should be based on electoral votes rather than the popular vote. Afterward, in order to win the election, a candidate must do the following: he or she must have a majority of the electoral college; therefore, the candidate must try to win most of the states with a high number of electors regardless of the total number of popular-votes earned. The amendment clearly states that in order for a presidential candidate to be nominated he or she needs to win the majority of the Electoral votes and the popular vote doesn't count. Opponents proposed alternatives to the Electoral college; however, none of them seem to work. The alternatives that were proposed fall into three categories. In the first, the electoral votes would be given to the candidate with the most popular votes in that state, but this is not sufficient enough because it would eliminate independent voting among electors. In the second, the breakdown of electoral votes would go with the breakdown of the popular votes. This would not have the rule in most states, that the winner takes all; that is the structure of the college so it would not work either. In the third, individual districts of Congress would be treated as a representative for one electoral vote, and two electoral votes would go to the winner of a majority of the district that it