Most people think that the Electoral College was born to bring the loser of the popular vote to win the electoral vote and so on, win the election. In the early years when the United States became settled, the constitution established a way to decide how the nation would govern itself. Delegates didn’t agree that the president and vice president of the United States should be selected by a direct popular vote of the people, but rather so settling on a system involving an Electoral College. The system was initiated to choose the president and vice president indirectly by deciding electoral votes in each state, as each state has a slate of electors. Should the system of indirect voting of the president and vice president be put to an end? The system of voting the president and vice president of the U.S. indirectly should be kept due to it was made for the common good from our Founding Fathers, it sends the message that Electoral College intends to prove a leader than the popular vote, and without it, this may weaken the two-party system. …show more content…
On document C, the text says, “It is designed to promote good government and legislation that forwards the common good of a large and diverse nation” (Document C), “It has formed our political parties, moderated our more extreme elements and forged the presidential campaigns that have given direction to our ship of state” (Document C). This here explains that the Electoral College is designed to promote good government and legislation to progress from our distinct nation. This comes to the closure of that the Founding Fathers created this for the common good of our nation and it promotes many elements that shape America as we see it