In november of 2016, many of us went to our designated voting polls to cast a vote for our next President of the United States. Our government creates this allured idea that our votes matter, however this isn’t the case. The Electoral College is the process which is responsible for electing the President of the United States. In 48 states, after all the votes are accounted for, the political party whose candidate received a majority in a particular state is given all of the votes for that state. For example, if the majority votes are republican in Virginia, then all 13 of Virginia’s votes go towards the republican candidate, even if 49% of the votes are democratic. As you can see, this system is unfair and flawed; therefore, the government …show more content…
This system isn’t based on the will of the people but instead the 538 people in congress, and the 2016 election was perfect example of this. Hillary Clinton lost the election to Donald Trump, even though she won the popular vote. Clinton received about 2.9 million more votes nationwide; however, Trump won the presidency because he won a total of 306 congress votes, whereas Clinton had 232 votes. If the electoral college was based on the will of the people then the popular votes should decide the presidents. The Electoral College is so inequitable that, According to a study done by Jesse Ruderman, “A presidential candidate could be elected with as a little as 21.8% of the popular vote by getting just over 50% of the votes in DC and each of 39 small states. This is true even when everyone votes and there are only two candidates. In other words, a candidate could lose with 78.2% of the popular vote by getting just under 50% in small states and 100% in large states. Even President Donald Trump, who benefitted from the system, stated after the 2016 election that he believes presidents should be chosen by popular vote: "I would rather see it where you went with simple votes. You know, you get 100 million votes and somebody else gets 90 million votes and you win". The fact is that Electoral College isn’t based on the people, but the 538 congress members that vote on our …show more content…
Under the Electoral College, A candidate can become president with only 21.8% of the popular vote. Meaning that 78.2% of people wouldn’t of chose this candidate for president. Also swing states unfairly allow for only the major two political parties to win, even with a majority votes for a independent party. Another unfair issue is that Smaller population states have a superior role in the election process than a higher population state. For example, Wyoming has one elector for every 177,556 people and Texas has one elector for about every 715,499. Based on theses facts, the Electoral College should be abolished and replaced with a fair and just