ipl-logo

Should Government Monitor The Internet

769 Words4 Pages

"Bill of Rights Institute Essay The Internet is a place where every citizen in America has access. Through the internet, people can communicate with any individual or research any entity such as an organization or government website. Criminals and terrorists can find access to anything, giving them the information they want or contact anyone they would like. The Federal Communication Commission (FCC), the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) are a few of government agencies that monitor or regulate internet use in the United States. State and Local governments also have agencies that monitor suspected criminals. Some people argue the government monitoring internet use restricts citizens_Ñé rights due to multiple amendments and laws. The difference is the extent of the duty each level of government has to monitor people_Ñés internet use. The United States_Ñé Government should have full responsibility to monitor the internet, so they may interrupt criminal activity and terrorism before it happens and protect innocent citizens from danger. …show more content…

The NSA has worked with Google and the FBI to monitor internet use (Dewey). The FBI is a part of the federal government and has recently been exposed for monitoring the internet. Although people argue that monitoring internet use is against the First Amendment, most cases the FBI and NSA use monitoring for include _ÑÒcomputer hacking, drug probes, extortion investigations, and one intellectual property case_Ñù (Hopper). Internet monitoring is only against the First Amendment if the government does not have probable cause. The government uses internet monitoring in positive ways to keep the people of the United States

Show More
Related

The Pros And Cons Of The 21st Amendment

298 Words | 2 Pages

The 21st Amendment was very crucial in moving forward in the United States society. The 18th Amendment prohibited alcohol while the 21st repealed it. The 18th did more harm to America than it did for the good. The Amendment gave way for organized crime and corruption to development.

Read More

Summary Of Black Code By Ronald Deibert

1319 Words | 6 Pages

“Black Code: Surveillance, Privacy, and the Dark Side of the Internet,” written by Ronald J. Deibert, outlines different issues and benefits that have arised due to the growing use of the internet. Deibert begins his essay providing information about the internet such as the rapid growth of smartphones, how the internet has taken over most of societies lives, and key differences between previous technological innovations compared to the internet. He continues his essay by discussing the U.S.A. Patriot Act and how this law should be retracted based on the fact that various companies, like Google, can give the government our personal searches if they ask. Then, he talks about various types of cyber crimes and how we need stronger regulations to control the internet so these crimes would not be possible. Deibert concludes his essay explaining how the internet has provided many benefits in today’s nation, but the internet needs stricter regulations for our own protection.

Read More

Explain Why The Federal Should Be In Charge Of The Internet

703 Words | 3 Pages

The internet is a real dangerous place where bad things can happen and will happen till someone put a stop to it. The internet is so easy to get now a days you can go to the library and get on the internet or you can go to a Starbucks or a mc Donald's and you have your hands on internet. People can get their hands on tons of stuff that they shouldn't be able to. The Federal should be in charge

Read More

NSA Pros And Cons

1042 Words | 5 Pages

That system in the constitution has gone seriously off the wheels when you see what is happening in the spy agencies.” After September 11, the United States responded by granting the NSA (a government agency created after WW2 to prevent surprise attacks on the United States) more power to protect the United States from future terror attacks. The agency collected mass amounts of data, sifting through millions of Americans metadata information. With the metadata that the NSA collected, Privacy activists argued that metadata included “personal information, which can build a more detailed profile than listening into

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The NSA Scandal

952 Words | 4 Pages

On one side people believe that the NSA’s surveillance of American citizens was constitutional since the internet is not physical property and that the internet is public and everyone can use it that it. The Fourth Amendment also only protects the physical belonging of the citizens within their homes, and since the internet is not a tangible item that the actions of the NSA did not violate anyone’s rights as an American. Another piece to the argument is that the internet is not technically in anyone’s home or a physical piece of property. This supports the previous argument that the NSA is not taking anything from anyone or physically disrupting anyone’s peace by looking through people’s whereabouts online. Some also argue that is a safety issue as a reason to excuse the NSA’s action.

Read More

Domestic Surveillance Pros And Cons

1543 Words | 7 Pages

The NSA or the National Security Agency carries out most of the domestic surveillance in the United States. Before the 9/11 attacks the NSA needed approval from a court, but after the attacks, they were given free reign to copy any data that possibly linked to terrorist activities. This led to many arguments over whether this collection of data was unconstitutional or not. The extent of this surveillance shocked many people; many civil rights advocates thought that this surveillance breached United States citizens’ rights. Because of the threat of domestic surveillance in the United States it should be decreased drastically but not entirely stopped.

Read More

The Internet Is A Surveillance State By Bruce Schneier

643 Words | 3 Pages

The internet, government, and corporations are all out to get you, or at least that is what Bruce Schneier would like convince you of in his work titled “The Internet Is a Surveillance State”. Schneier identifies many reasons as to why a surveillance state is a negative, such as constant tracking, habit profiling, and lack of privacy both in public and in the comfort of your own home. What Schneier fails to address, however, is that a surveillance state isn’t always a negative, and quite possibly it is a necessary evil to prevent bad things from happening around the globe. As Whitney Cramer states in her essay titled “Giving up Our Privacy: Is it Worth It?” , Schneier “fails to acknowledge” that the “loss of privacy to protect the innocent

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The Fourth Amendment

794 Words | 4 Pages

"Internet privacy has recently been a hotly debated issue. If the government does not have probable cause or a warrant to monitor internet activity, then they are not permitted to do so. I base this off of the Fourth Amendment: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. ” Making this claim, I believe that the Patriot Act, the National Security Agency’s surveillance, and practices like these are illegal.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Surveillance Of The NSA

694 Words | 3 Pages

"The Government began to become concerned with the United State’s national security after the events that transpired on September 11, 2001. The NSA began to monitor various forms of communication throughout the United States. Recently, after Edward Snowden released classified information about the NSA surveillance programs, the idea of monitoring internet content has become upsetting and worrisome to many. From monitoring phone calls to facebook posts, the government practically has access to it all. So what platforms should be deemed necessary for public safety and where should the line be drawn?

Read More

Is Invading Our Privacy By Julie Myhreis: Article Analysis

2507 Words | 11 Pages

It can be said that the Internet affects every aspect in society’s lives from the things they see and read on there. Although many see the Internet as only doing good, there are people who are using it to violate the privacy of others. Such people are those who run our government, working on unauthorized surveillance by using the Internet to do so. In

Read More

Congress Should Have The Right To Regulate Essay

546 Words | 3 Pages

Though it does not say that the states, nor do local government has the luxury of this right. So a federal agency such as the FBI, or the CIA will, and should have access to what us Americans have been doing via the internet.

Read More

Argumentative Essay: Do We Need The NSA?

523 Words | 3 Pages

US internet use has not declined at all since Edward Snowden’s leakage of the NSA’s operations in 2013. According to Internet Live Stats, US internet usage has increased at about 17.8 million new users per year, mostly for miscellaneous reasons. According to Scott Public Relations, the 3 most popular uses for the internet by far are social networking, gaming, and emailing, constituting 41.9% of the total time Americans spend online. Representatives there is no need to investigate the NSA. They are one of our few feasible defenses against terrorism today, and we cannot afford to lose it.

Read More

Informative Essay On The NSA

1767 Words | 8 Pages

Surveillance can be done by anyone who truly wants to do it. Usually it’s done by internet corporations like Google, who collects the data of their users all the time and it’s done by governments. In this essay, I’ll be focusing on the United States government’s

Read More

The Importance Of Amendment IV Of The Internet

519 Words | 3 Pages

" The essence of being an American has so much to do with freedom; the personal rights held by every individual in this country are often sacred to them. The government, at any level, does not have the right, much less the duty, to monitor internet content just as they do not have the right to ban books from schools or listen in on an individual’s phone calls without probable cause. Every American has a right to privacy that shall not be infringed by the government. Amendment IV of the constitution reads “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” There are no specific clauses in the constitution that provide legislature on the topic of government monitoring of the internet because the founders could not foresee the future. This does not mean that it is okay.

Read More

The Importance Of Government Control On The Internet

792 Words | 4 Pages

Agencies watch the things we post in order to catch criminals and make sure terrorists have little control in convincing. Now this can be a good thing but if the power goes to far it could be a violation of our rights and privacy. Which goes against the constitution. The government should have limits to how much power they have on the internet for the safety and rights of our people. A good thing is to realize what rights we have on the internet and watch what we post.

Read More

More about Should Government Monitor The Internet

Related Topics

Open Document