ipl-logo

Should Social Media Prohibit Hate Speech

825 Words4 Pages

Social Media Websites Should Prohibit Hate Speech
The digital era has enhanced ways in which individuals interact – it has also facilitated easier and effective means for individuals to interact across the globe, alleviating challenges such costs, distance, and duration. Essentially, the exponential growth of the nternet and related technologies has been of great significance as they provide the platform for people to interact therefore enhancing communication as a whole. In particular, one of the features of the internet that has enhanced communication is the social media – this has enhanced how people interact regardless of the distance. Despite the economic benefits, which have been introduced by the continuous growth and use of the internet, social media has acted as a platform for hate speech. This essay therefore addresses the manner in which social media facilitate the spread of hate speech in order to support the proposition that social media should prohibit hate speech.
Social media is a platform for hate speech as it is an interactive network, which is also decentralized and …show more content…

As initially discussed, hate speech is conveyed by a group of online individuals who share similar identity and values; as such, they end up conveying discriminatory statements or view either through blogs, emails, or personal facebook accounts of their target audience (Messmer). In this regard, I believe facebook should come up with a way of policing with an intention of regulating the content shared through various online platforms. Equally, Internet Service Providers should cooperate in order to work on modalities aimed at limiting the level of hate witnessed in different social networks. For instance, they should incorporate Codes of Conduct to their internet services, which give them the authority to block and remove completely online hate groups and other hate-related

Show More
Related
435 Words | 2 Pages

I don't think people should be prosecuted for statements made on social media. As people say things about other people all the time talking about celebrities if people dislike a celebrity and openly talk about why would they be criminally prosecuted for hurting the other person's feelings? People should instead go to adults or teachers if they are young and people should be more mature when they are older to not cyberbully. evidence for this is in source 2 where it says “Indeed, the first amendment is regularly limited by legislation but this does not make it some sort of nebulous “privilege” this is talking about how the First Amendment is a right that should not be taken away for hurting someone's feelings. And instead, there should be people

Read More
447 Words | 2 Pages

Should Individuals Be Prosecuted For Statements Made On Social Media? Have you ever thought about the consequences of cyberbullying? There can be a lot of consequences if you decide to cyberbully someone. If the statements you make are illegal, such as inciting violence or making threats, then individuals can and should be prosecuted for those statements and actions made. There are many ways cyberbullying can affect someone’s everyday life.

Read More
527 Words | 3 Pages

In the New York Times article “The Harm in Free Speech”, Stanley Fish argues that it would make no difference if Jeremy Waldron’s book, “The Harm in Hate Speech,” was titled “The Harm in Free Speech”. While providing an insightful review of the novel, Fish promotes the ideas depicted in the novel. Fish argues that American society is obsessed with using the First Amendment to say outwardly offensive statements. Fish asserts that “hate speech” is not simply expressing an opinion, but rather a way to belittle members of society a person deems unworthy. Americans hide behind the First Amendment and use it as a justification to spew hate speech.

Read More
797 Words | 4 Pages

In her article titled The Flip Side Of Internet Fame, Jessica Bennett focuses on how social media is a place that’s full of hysteria. Bennett says, “Online there are few checks and hardly any monitoring. Moreover, studies show that the anonymity of the net encourages people to say things they normally wouldn’t.” In an attempt to fit in, many take the side of the most common posted opinion even if extremely vulgar or offensive, which can send a large group of people in the same state of fury. These incidents on the internet can have a more hysteric effect, entire cities, states, and countries have felt endangered over a post on a website.

Read More
912 Words | 4 Pages

Currently, the United State’s criterion on Speech includes, “obscenity, fraud, child pornography, harassment, incitement to illegal conduct and imminent lawless action, true threats, and commercial speech such as advertising, copyright or patent rights” (Gaudefroy 3). However, speech involving discriminatory words or racial intentions are protected by the law. To avoid instances that degrade the minority group, stricter rules need to be enforced on the delicate topic. Restrictions on hate speech should include usage of “misogynistic, homophobic, racist, and conspiracy-laden language” (Gaudefroy 3). Efforts to restrict these types of beliefs would create a more safe and equal society for all individuals.

Read More
265 Words | 2 Pages

Hate speech—words or symbols targeted at a particular group or person that attack or intimidate them based upon sex, race, religion, ethnicity, disability, sexual orientation, or gender—has recently become extremely controversial, especially in regards to college campuses. Although merely visual or verbal behaviors, hate speech can indirectly and directly cause physical and psychological harms. Philosophers Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic delve into the negative impact of hate speech in their essay “Words That Wound”, detailing exactly how supposed expressions of freedom of speech can detrimentally impact its victims. Such dire consequences thus call for targeted and threating speech to be banned in certain spaces in order to sustain a safe environment for the majority of people.

Read More
1000 Words | 4 Pages

The question at hand is whether criminal law is an appropriate response to combat various forms of discrimination, particularly in the context of hate crime legislation. This debate revolves around the effectiveness of criminal law in addressing societal biases. Proponents argue that criminalizing hate-motivated behaviour is necessary to deter such offenses and protect vulnerable communities. Conversely, critics contend that relying solely on criminal law may not effectively address underlying societal issues and could potentially infringe upon freedom of expression. In this essay, I will explore both perspectives and argue for a balanced approach to addressing hate crimes.

Read More
486 Words | 2 Pages

Hate Rhetoric Found Online Rajagopal and Bojin’s “Digital Representation: Racism on the World Wide Web” article explained the different kinds of hate rhetoric that appear on the Internet. At the time the article was written in 2002, it included many forms of hate, which still appear today. Without question, it can be argued that there has been little improvement with racial hate. And the increase of social media the past several years has not helped. The article mentions different kinds of hate of racial hate rhetoric found online.

Read More
936 Words | 4 Pages

Freedom of speech allows individuals to publicly decipher whatever words they wish to speak. It is a reasonable concept of a coherent argument with combative or comparative in speech for which it can be mistaken for hate speech. The forms of the inabilities between hate and free speech to imagine a new world. The difference between two speeches as a powerful movement towards changing the attitudes about limiting speech for individuals. The characterizing of this controversy is that hate speech regulations are not beyond our grasp, but theatrical and legal if society does not take a stand and bring on to change.

Read More
628 Words | 3 Pages

The internet used to be a source for researching information, but today it is used as a battle field of hate and shame. Many people are using social media as a way of being spiteful and mean to others. People are sometimes being recorded against their will and placed on internet sites for other people to view. Some may see it as a funny joke, but the person who it is actually happening to sees it as humiliating and violating.

Read More
197 Words | 1 Pages

It is a very difficult and complex issue whether to publish hate speech or not. Anthony Lewis(2007) believed that hate speech makes us aware of terrible circumstances and enhances our resolve to combat them. But on the other hand, hate speech is expressed and transmitted by hatred rather than beneficial information. And the hatred is detrimental to the interests of society, and as well as desecrate to personal dignity. It is a violation of personal personality and reputation.

Read More
762 Words | 4 Pages

This paper will also talk about any First Amendment arguments that the student with the Facebook page might raise and my responses. Cyberbullying and the steps I am required to take Cyberbullying is a big issue in todays age with all the access to technology. Almost everyone you see adults and students have some type of social media page on either Facebook or Twitter or even both.

Read More
1152 Words | 5 Pages

The ability to speak freely is written in the bill of rights and has been preserved for decades, but when free speech turns into hate speech it brings up the widely deliberated issue about banning hate speech. There are many different perspectives on the issue of hate speech. Author of Hate Speech is Free Speech, Gov. Dean and Law professor, Glenn Harlan Reynolds, applies a strong historical perspective on the situation arguing that people are “constitutionally illiter[ate]” when they make the claim that hate speech is not part of the First Amendment. Believing that it is impossible to ban hate speech because everyone will always disagree with any idea, Reynolds focuses on the problems with banning hate speech and what might happen if hate

Read More
929 Words | 4 Pages

Many people over the world rely on ‘real life’ and ‘offline’ action and behaviours to express their opinion on politics. For those without the internet, their voices may go unheard and ignored. Furthermore, Papacharissi expresses that popular forums online may not create a utopian democratic society as many extremist groups are able to discuss their views online. Knights of the Ku Klux Klan is a great illustration of how the internet can publicize extremist views and undemocratic values, as they promote racism towards African-American citizens. These negative effects are a creating a significant obstruction towards the creation of a global democratic society.

Read More
1259 Words | 6 Pages

Firstly, Ring (2013) wrote about a thesis entitled “Hate Speech in Social Media: an Exploration of the Problem and Its Proposed solutions”. This study research shows that although most major social media companies such as Google, Facebook and Twitter have their own policies regarding whether and what kinds of hate speech that are permitted on their sites, the policies are often inconsistently applied and can be difficult for users to understand. In Ring’s dissertation, she suggested that social media platforms have to encourage self-regulation about what kind of hate speech contents are, and those contents are not permitted on these sites. Forming A working group comprised of social media decision makers will develop the policy and staff members of the Federal Communications Commission will facilitate this process. The focus of her study is the legal communication and scholars of those social media regulations.

Read More

More about Should Social Media Prohibit Hate Speech

Related Topics

Open Document