The case of the Menendez brothers has long been a topic of heated debate in legal circles. The brothers were convicted of the brutal murders of their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez, in their Beverly Hills home in 1989. While some argue that the brothers should have been charged with manslaughter due to the physical and emotional abuse they suffered at the hands of their parents, others contend that the heinous nature of the crime warrants a murder charge. This essay will argue that the Menendez brothers should indeed be charged with manslaughter instead of murder, despite the counter claim that their crime was too heinous to warrant anything less than a murder charge.
Firstly, the evidence presented at trial suggests that the Menendez brothers were victims of years of physical and emotional abuse. They testified that their father was a violent and abusive figure who regularly beat and tormented them, while their mother failed to protect them from his abuse. This abuse had a profound impact on the brothers and may have contributed to their decision to kill their parents. While this does not excuse their actions, it does suggest that they were acting out of fear and desperation, rather than with the intent to commit murder.
…show more content…
They did not have a premeditated plan to kill their parents and did not set out to commit murder that night. Instead, they claim that they acted in self-defense, believing that their parents were going to kill them. This suggests that their actions were not driven by malice or a desire to harm their parents, but by a fear for their own