Recommended: The media and criminal justice system
Visual Evidence: Schweiger Case The bone chilling cold of a January night in Leipsic Delaware, standing under a dark bridge waiting for the text that will guarantee a warm bed for the night. Finally a text comes through urging the need to hurry. Leaving the safety of the bridge heading to the home where the warm bed is waiting, open the door to find the woman who had been sending the texts, the love of one’s life knife in hand on top of her father’s lifeless body. This is the scene that Jerry Schweiger says he walked in on that fateful night that would change his life forever.
The Founding Fathers wanted the people of the United States to be in a democracy or self-government and established the jury system into the constitution. It is expensive and is a long process to start a jury trial. Also, jurors are not as professional as judges and can not determine a fair verdict. The Crime Scene Investigation (CSI) effect might also affect the verdict of the jury. The American jury system should not be used because of it not being cost-effective, the lack of experience of the jury, which leads to justice not being served, and the CSI effect impacting the
Back in 2013, Trayvon Martin, a black, teenage boy was fatally shot by George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer who racially profiled Trayvon, resulting to his death. However, with Martin being dead, the case had to be determined off of Zimmerman and what his reasoning was. With unreliable witnesses called to the stand, there was no clear evidence to if George Zimmerman was guilty or not. However, if there was some type of camera there, the case would be easily solved and justice would be served. If either one of them were to be wearing anything like a Google glass or something along those lines, it would definitely benefit the government.
This shows that evidence is an important role in pleading someone guilty. When you convict someone of a crime, make sure you know the evidence and information on the case before sentencing
The reason O.J. was found not guilty of murder and acquitted in criminal court, but found guilty of the tort of harm and ordered to pay damages in the civil court lies in the structure of our legal system, in regards to criminal cases and civil cases. The distinct difference between criminal cases and civil cases provides further explanation regarding the O.J. Simpson case. Criminal cases deal with crimes against society. It is the government, not the victim, who brings action against the charged individual. In criminal cases, the penalties can include a number things including jail time.
This may cause the jury to be indecisive between what the actual case and what the media portrays it to be. The amount of media released for cases creates a negative impact within the courts and makes it difficult for a fair trial. When juries are uncertain about a case or a suspect, they result to social media platforms and news coverage that will provide them with more information and depth into the case. ‘’But if the case unfolds in the media, by the time a case gets to court, the supposedly impartial jury (or even the judge) may have already heard information and allegations (not admissible by court standards) that have caused them to seriously prejudice the parties’’. (Nedim, 2014).
What really happened the night of May 5, 1993? On that day, three 8 year old boys went missing right after school. All three little boys were found killed and tied up in the stream in the woods. Three boys were charged with the murder of the three little boys. Damien Echols and Jason Baldwin were sitting at Damien’s house when the cops came and apprehended them.
Known as “The Manson Family,” the suspects of the crimes committed in California areas, were compelled to do such vicious doings out of love. Two of the most famous crimes committed by The Manson Family were the murders of actress Sharron Tate and well-know business owners Leno and Rosemary LaBianca. On the night of the Tate murders that took place on August 9, 1969, shocked many of Hollywood’s individuals. Sharon Tate, along with many family friends on the night of their deaths, had no idea what they were in for on that day. Tate, eight months pregnant at the time, was stabbed to death numerous times and just like her, friends of Sharon were stabbed many times as well.
They grabbed him from a shopping mall, walked with him through the suburbs of Bootle and Walton, then took him to a secluted area on train tracks and killed him. This case attracted media attention, for the reaon of the murderers being only ten year old. In the trial 38 witness testified, that they saw the three boys and most of them saw that Bulger was in distress. But only a few of them intervened but not to the extent that they saved Bulger.
Title: Fallacies in the movie ’12 Angry Men’ Name: Prerna Singh Roll No.: 13110082 Word Count: The movie ’12 Angry Men’ beautifully presents a number of critical thinking aspects. Fallacies are depicted with excellent examples. Here is a list of the fallacies observed. Every juror had his own set of prejudices which gave way to so many fallacies to come up.
When body cams are put on police officers the judge and jury can see what really happened when police and civilians differ, and police supervisors get less complaints from the public. Police will also be put in less danger. Providing Evidence When civilian and police differ in court the judge and the
This is an important element when deciding who the best and worst jurors were. There were no facts as to who was right or wrong because we didn’t see the crime in question. All
Burden of proof in civil trial cases Burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies, this is the principle that one has to consider. Evidence contains facts of issues that really relevant and which is also admissible in the court, they are meant to support the case of parties or spoil the case which supposed to discharge party in his burden of proof, in civil cases it always based on the balance of probability, which the party have responsibility to establish before the court. Based on this, the court in civil will act on the preponderance of evidence, means that the party with genuine and clear evidence will wins the case. Example of this type of case is when there is a contract between two parties and plaintiff proved
In this paragraph, the advantages and disadvantages of trial by jury will be discussed. The main advantages are that juries introduce community values into the legal process and can influence the system (Joyce, 2013); they can achieve a sense of equity and fairness without enforcing unjust laws; in addition, juries are independent and neutral (Davies, 2015). Moreover, they guarantee participation from the public in a democratic institution (Hostettler, 2004), and represent the population thanks to the randomness with which jurors are decided (Davies, 2015). On the other hand, the most important disadvantages are that jurors have no prior contact with the courts, no training (Hostettler, 2004) and therefore they lack knowledge of law, courtroom proceedings (Joyce, 2013), and lack of ability to understand the legal directions (Thomas, 2010). Moreover, they must face evidence which is highly technical (Hostettler, 2004).
Televising Court Proceedings Turn on the television right now; it will not be difficult to find a show featuring a court case. It is most likely actors portraying the role of court participants unrealistically. The public now has a false picture of a court proceeding. The controversy on cameras in the court room started after the famous trial of O.J. Simpson was televised. It gave the public a realistic view into the court room.
