ipl-logo

Should The Three Branches Of Government View Same Sex Marriages?

792 Words4 Pages

January 30, 2017
American Government Paper #3

Many years ago same sex marriages was unheard of, in fact many people would frown at very sight of the same sex holding hands or even walking together. It’s funny how things have changed, today same sex marriages it is accepted in many states and although it is viewed legal. Same sex marriages is one of the most controversial topic’s of today. However, many people dislike and have various reasons why they are against same sex-marriages. Growing up I was always taught that homosexuality is immoral and marriage consist of a man and a women. Throughout this paper we will look and analyze how the three branches of government view same-sex marriages. The government is made up of three branches legislative, …show more content…

This branch of government is also very instrumental when it comes to constitutional change. According to an internet article title Branches of government –public policy: gay marriage. The legislative branch introduces a bill that forces other states to view same-sex marriage equal and legal. It states that “on Jun 26th 2013 congress introduced a bill concerning same sex marriage. It was called the Respect for Marriage Act, this bill would make other states recognize a legal same-sex marriage from another state” (Web). The way this bill works gay marriages is viewed as one and has the same equal rights just like heterosexual couples. What was once unheard of is now the present but in many eyes like my own; it will always be viewed as a sin, wrong and immoral. Although people are entitled to their own beliefs when it comes to gay marriages, I believe we as a nation has compromised on what constitute marriage and to me that consist of a man and a …show more content…

This means making sure that everyone from the court system to the Supreme Court understands and follow the laws in regards to same-sex marriages and “In a long – sought victory for the gay rights movement, the Supreme Court ruled by a 5- to-4 vote on Friday that the Constitution guarantees a right to same-sex marriage.” (Adam Liptak )This ruling to making same-sex marriage right in the eyes of our nation favors gay marriages, This victory pretty much put an end to everyone personal views thought and feelings about same-sex marriages . They have the same rights and benefits as a heterosexual married

Show More
Related
646 Words | 3 Pages

Obergefell v. Hodges is one of the most important Supreme Court rulings to date. This case, by a 5-4 decision, legalized same-sex marriage and established that the 14th amendment, by both the Due Process Clause and Equal Protections Clause, guarantees this right. The Supreme Court for a long time exercised judicial modesty in terms of cases involving same sex marriage by allowing the decisions to be made by the states. However, with some states recognizing same-sex marriages and others not, things began to get complicated when couples would move to other states and not get the same benefits as married couples and other similar situations that caused issues. However, when the Supreme Court took this case and ruled that same-sex marriage was legal in all 50 states, it was a prime example of the court using judicial activism.

Read More
677 Words | 3 Pages

This paper focuses on the Supreme Court case Obergefell v. Hodges (2015). This paper will give an overview of the case, the major arguments made by the plaitiffs and the defendents, as well as how the case has affected other rulings. This case has answered many legal questions and will shape any future cases that deal with gay marriage, possibly even equal rights. Deatiled CH: James Obergefell and John Arthur was a same-sex couple and was married on July 11, 2013 on a medical transport plan on the tarmac at the airport in Baltimore, Maryland due to Arthur being unable to move (3,2) .

Read More
971 Words | 4 Pages

In my brief I will explore the effect of the Loving V. Virginia (1967) on the case of Obergefell V. Hodges (2015) and how it led to legalization of same sex marriage. I will prove that the 9th amendment which addresses the right to marriage did not specify that marriage should be between a man and a woman. I will also prove that the precedents set by prior cases reflected on the decision of the supreme justice. I will first explain the prior cases and discuss their rulings and reflect on the reason judges chose this. I will then discuss the Obergefell v. Hodges case and its similarity to prior cases .

Read More
2137 Words | 9 Pages

Hodges (2015) the Supreme Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees the right to marry as one of the fundamental liberties it protects, applying to same-sex couples the same as opposite-sex couples. This case was brought forward by numerous groups of same-sex couples who were suing their relevant state agencies to challenge the constitutionality of those states’ same-sex marriage laws. The Supreme Court found that there is no difference between same-sex marriages and opposite-sex marriages, therefore, the exclusion of same-sex couples from the right to marry violates the Due Process Clause. This is policy making because the Supreme Court forced states to change their laws by deciding that it was against the constitution to not only ban the recognition of same-sex marriages that occurred in states that allowed it, but also making same-sex marriage legal in all states. Government officials even those who do not believe in the law change must abide by it, by allowing same-sex couples their now legal right to be married and receive the benefits that opposite-sex married couples receive; changing the way that citizens and the government interact in societal ways but also financial

Read More
1057 Words | 5 Pages

This analyses that same sex couples should also have the right to marry. One of the reason why the supreme court sided with Loving was because “Decisions about marriage are among the most intimate that an individual can

Read More
1243 Words | 5 Pages

“Once known, the fact that a person is a homosexual or a member of a racial minority group is regarded by members of the majority group (heterosexuals, Whites) as one of the most important pieces of information about her or him (Hereck).” The law of marriage only to opposite couples had affected a large portion of people that had different sexualities. This law encouraged people to go out and fight for their rights by starting petitions and protests as well. In this case, I believe that it was also seen as an unjust law, where it was only fair to part of the

Read More
955 Words | 4 Pages

Same-sex marriage has a near even split of people that are for or against it. This split is seen clearly in the Obergefell v. Hodges case in the U.S. Supreme Court, where the decision was 5 to 4. The majority in this case chose to legalize same-sex marriage in all 50 states. This decision brought a lot of controversy from the U.S. citizens, and the controversy came from the question if the Supreme Court decision in Obergefell was the correct decision for America. The answer is no.

Read More
259 Words | 2 Pages

When debating the legalization of same sex marriage, religious reasoning and accusations of bigotry often provoke obstinance. Instead of reiterating those arguments, William J. Bennett, a prominent cultural conservative, former secretary of education, and author of The Book of Virtues, focuses on societal effects in his op-ed article, “Against Gay Marriage.” Though Bennett’s piece conveys partiality, it also attempts to discuss this issue scrupulously to ensure readers will consider his argument and perhaps accept his implications. While some of Bennett’s word choices convey tolerance of the gay community, his rhetoric incites readers to accept that preserving society requires marginalizing homosexuals.

Read More
504 Words | 3 Pages

Huckabee stated, “This ruling is not about marriage equality, it’s about marriage redefinition. This irrational, unconstitutional rejection of the expressed will of the people in over 30 states will prove to be one of the court’s most disastrous decisions, and they have had many” (“Mike Huckabee”). Former Arkansas Governor and Presidential Candidate Mike Huckabee opposes same sex marriage and believes Americans must defend, protect and preserve traditional marriage (“Values”).

Read More
481 Words | 2 Pages

The branches in the United States government are executive, legislative and judicial. All of these branched function together and are part of the bureaucracy of the United States. When comparing all branches an easy way to look at them is an executive is the law, essentially the president. Whereas legislature is where laws are being made, or denied. Lastly the judicial branch is the supreme court.

Read More
495 Words | 2 Pages

Cool Guys Walk away from Explosions! In the short story “The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas” many people leave the city of Omelas never coming back. These people Leave Omelas for the sake of one suffering child who can't be helped. I would do the same as these humble people and I would leave this terrible city so that my suffering isn't being contained within this young child.

Read More
911 Words | 4 Pages

The federal judge in San Antonio, Texas, “ruled that Texas ' ban on same-sex marriage violates the U.S. Constitution and demeans the dignity of gay couples "for no legitimate reason." Judge Orlando Garcia then granted two plaintiff couples ' request for an injunction barring the state from enforcing the ban.” (Keen 1) One of the couples sought to be married in Texas while the other couple had already been married in Massachusetts, but desired to be recognized by the state of Texas. In Garcia’s ruling, he states that, “the Texas bans violate the guarantees of due process and equal protection of the U.S. Constitution.”

Read More
1013 Words | 5 Pages

The United States Supreme Court decision implemented a positive string of events for the gay community, it was solely based on the constitutionality of the amendment

Read More
899 Words | 4 Pages

Until recently, many states within the United States did not allow homosexual/LGBT couples to get married. Due to the fact that LGBT couples have not been recognized

Read More
1612 Words | 7 Pages

Joey Cho Mrs. Middleton English 10 17 October 2016 Persuasive Research Essay Outline Introduction LGBT/ same-sex marriage is one of the most heated and controversial debates in our current society. Unlike the past thousands of years whereas marriage was defined as a legal union between a man and a woman, now the concept of marriage has been extended to a broader context. “Homosexuality” in most cultures is viewed as a disgrace, and it is often considered as a great sin from a religious aspect.

Read More

More about Should The Three Branches Of Government View Same Sex Marriages?

Related Topics

Open Document