Throughout the years of 1945 and 1991, the U.S. and the Soviet Union were involved in what is today is identified as the Cold War. During this dark time many lived in fear due to the newest weapon that would be used in war, nuclear weapons. These weapons caused fear throughout the whole world because of their capability to kill thousands with just one. Today many debate over the abolition of nuclear weapons in the United States. Some argue that the U.S. should abolish nuclear weapons, while others say nuclear weapons should not be abolished in the United States. The U.S. should not abolish nuclear weapons because it's going to take more than just the U.S to get rid of them, the knowledge of nuclear weapons is out there, and lastly the U.S needs a range of options for their new type of adversaries.
As a country of its people and their safety the United States can't get rid of their nuclear weapons. Besides abolishing them would take more than just the United States. As mentioned in Document D, “The United States cannot defeat these threats alone...it needs cooperation from dozens of diverse nations.” The abolition of nuclear weapons wouldn't really be progress if all other countries still have them Therefore, why should the United States get rid of them. Document D
…show more content…
As said by Izhar Cohen, “the nuclear genie of how to make an an atomic bomb is out of the bottle, which means other nations or terrorists can obtain them and destabilize deterrence.” Izhar Cohen makes a point that the process of making an atomic bomb isn't a secret hence giving the U.S. another reason for them to keep their nuclear weapons. Because the process of making nuclear weapons is spreading, the U.S. needs to keep them for safety reasons. He also makes a point that terrorists could obtain them therefore making anyone without nuclear weapons an immediate target, giving the U.S. another reason to keep their nuclear