Should we be policing our police?
The public have always been told to trust the police, but how can we, when the police themselves are the ones committing crimes such as rape, kidnapping and even murder? They should be the ones holding up the values of the community, not the ones committing violent crime. Time after time this continues to happen, this is disgusting, vile and evil. Why are police officers able to get away with crimes and still hold onto their jobs? What gives them the right to enforce the rules if they cannot stick to them themself? For many years police have committed crimes and only got minor backlash. Due to the impact of social media, many families are getting the justice they deserve. We should not have to police our
…show more content…
People all over the world have been affected but it continues to happen. This became clear when the home office published that 68 police officers along with 25 staff were found guilty of committing various crimes such as abuse, police brutality and rape. The fact this is not highlighted by the relevant police authorities more is appalling, disgusting and downright disappointing. This is not something that communities should have to think about when approaching a police officer. This shows that there are still so many police officers committing crimes. The Police are supposed to be staples in their local communities seen as respectful, trustworthy, and helpful, but how can people look up to police officers if such a high amount of police are committing crimes. Overall, this clearly shows that police try to enforce rules that they cannot follow which is disgusting, how is anyone expected to trust them knowing the hypocrisy which takes place within the police …show more content…
That is what happened to thousands around the world some rallying more public attention than others. One of the cases that received more public attention in recent years was the case of George Floyd in which the police officer (Derek Michael Chauvin) placed his knee upon Floyd's neck to the point where he could not breathe. This influenced a movement BLM), which was felt all around the world. As the case developed the defendant pleaded guilty to the murder of Mr. George Floyd, Mr. Chauvin was also found guilty of second-degree man slaughter, third degree murder and second-degree unintentional murder. The defendant was sentenced for twenty-two and a half years due to state law he was only sentenced on the most serious offence of the three which was second degree murder. For this offence you can be sentenced to up to 40 years in prison. The state law that prevents someone from being given time for multiple incidents at once is frankly ridiculous. Some may say that he placed his knee on Floyd to restrain him but is that not the whole point in hand cuffs? It is clear this was no accident as Derrek Chauvin was found to have done the exact same ‘form of restrainment’ to a 14-year-old boy who then had to be placed in hospital. There was also no need for him to restrain him this way as he also was able to keep his hand on him and his colleague already had a hold of him