We frequently find out about sexual assaults through various news sources and survivors, but what instances are focused solely on a college or university campus? On school grounds, females are more likely to get assaulted than a male. Many will contend that a young woman, who is dressed provocatively or who has had an excessive number of alcoholic beverages, may have had it coming for her. In Desperation Passes by Phil Hutcheon, we discover that the outcome of a fraternity party affects the life of a young drunk woman, who is sexually assaulted by a football coach at a motel. Throughout the following, paragraphs we see how her story unravels.
On April 20, 1999, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold left the world in a state of shock when they embarked on one of the most perilous school shootings in American history. The Columbine High School shooting left thirteen dead and a total of twenty-two injured. After this massacre took place, many wondered what triggered these boys to attack their own school, and if there was any way it could have been prevented. The novel “Columbine” by Dave Cullen illustrates why this may not have been possible. The attack on Columbine High School was inevitable because of the deranged behaviors of Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold.
By writing “when the ideas, values, and speech of the other side are seen not just as wrong but as willfully aggressive toward innocent victims, it is hard to imagine the kind of mutual respect, negotiation, and compromise that are needed to make politics a positive-sum game”, the authors exhibit their feelings that perceiving differing opinions as aggressive is the wrong viewpoint. Connecting the disputes at college campuses to affecting politics develops a pressing feeling that something needs to change. Many people may view the culture at universities as something that doesn’t affect them or matter, and the writers of this article hope and try to change this outlook by constantly referencing how the increased amount of coddling and protectiveness will poorly affect the future of the students as well as the
The book “Rampage The Social Roots Of School Shootings” written by Newman et al, offers many different views and theories behind the issues of Rampage school shootings. In this paper I will give the reader an in depth overview and evaluation of the aforementioned book. Offering researched based reasons to why these school shootings actually happen. They explore the communities of Heath and Westside, the grounds of two horrific acts of rampage shootings by Michael Carnell, Andrew Golden and Mitchell Johnson. They explain various angles of there research such as identifying an issue, how signals given by children can be misinterpreted, the effects of social capital and how mental factors play a role in the acts of the shooters.
Article 1 Summary () Here, Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt, discuss how vindictive protectiveness hurts students on college campuses, challenging college’s ability to be a breathing ground for diverse critical thinking as opposed to protection from opposing ideas. Vindictive protectiveness is the protection of students from words and ideas on college campuses that may seem offensive or opposite; along with the punishment of people with these words regardless if it was accidental or of critical critique. They state “…students should [be taught] how to live in a world full of potential offenses.” They go on to hypothesize
The school district’s argument is that there is a drug issue among students. In Thomas Proctor’s article on the case, he notes, “Like Acton, the facts in Earls confirmed a ‘drug problem’ manifested in a variety of ways: students that had appeared to be under the influence of drugs at school, students that had spoken openly about drug use, a
Throughout this documentary, viewers learn that many sexual assault cases happen on college campuses. However, many of these cases are often ignored by college administrators because universities want to keep rape statistics low and they have an financial incentive to do so. In the film it states that there are less than 8% of men in college that commit more than 90% of sexual assaults. This indicates that because
After reading the article Dating Violence Among College Students: The Risk and Protective Factors by Catherine Kaukinen the two issues that impacted me was the risk and protective factors such as gender, violence in the family of origin, emotional states and mental health, substance use and abuse, sexual risk taking, nature of intimate relationships, academic engagement and protective factors. The author explores each of these factors by looking at other research to gain an understanding and to bring awareness to dating violence among college students. Additionally, giving ideas to how to prevent or reduce the dating violence among college students. When discussing the different factors of college dating violence the author summarizes them
As Nevada Assemblywoman Michele Fiore put it memorably, “If these young, hot little girls on campus have a firearm, I wonder how many men will want to assault them. [Sexual] assaults... would go down once these sexual predators get a bullet in the head.” Critics
Following the highly publicized incident at Columbine High School on April 20 1999, the most deadly act of school violence in the United States to date, it was perceived that fear of victimization had increased significantly. However, no research had been done of Columbine’s impact on students’ fear and little was known about whether or not events like Columbine had any effect on fear of victimization. Conducting one of the first studies of its kind, Lynn A. Addington published her work Students’ Fear after Columbine: Findings from a Randomized Experiment to better understand changes in fear associated with this level of violence. In order to do this, the researcher used data collected from the 1995 and 1999 National Crime Victimization Survey
The number of shootings that have happened lately on college campuses is frightening. Colleges should go to the extreme to keep campus safe. According to Russia Today 's website, there have been 52 campus shooting in the year 2015 in the US. If this continues, the shootings will increase and more students will die. Campus officials and other staff should work hand in hand with the government system, so they can strengthen security on campuses.
In society and college campuses, sexual assault occurs quite frequently. According to an estimation one third of women experience a forced sexual experience at least once in their life and most of the time it occurs in colleges. Men have also been reported to be victim of sexual assaults mostly by other men. Most of the time the sexual assault is planned and perpetrated by a third person, who is known to the victim of incident. Drug and alcohol use play role in this issue and contribute to the problem as most of the time the victim and perpetrators are under the effect of alcohol or any other drug during the incident.
According to some research done at Alfred University, some of the top reasons that cause lethal violence in schools are because, they seek vengeance for those who have hurt them, they are victims of bullying and they suffer some sort of mental illness; 62% agree that most shooters do not value life. This study also mentions that 89% of the population believe that white students are most likely to be the perpetrators. The access to guns has increased over the past couple of decades. – 61 percent of the
Security, protection, education, and success should be the main things that should be provided for any student. The School system is finding ways in improving safety to drop the numbers of some types of crimes that occur in every day at schools. Police should be more involved in the look out for any that could possibly put someone on the campus community in danger. That way it would be a lot faster to stop a dangerous situation that could occur. For
Esbensin, Peterson, Taylor and Freng (2010) implies that “ young people who have committed serious violent offenses have the highest level of impulsive and risk-seeking tendencies.” Moreover, extreme violent criminal activity being performed in front of youth increases the risk of them performing acts of extreme violence themselves. Because youth see those acts as acceptable so committng those violent activities make youths to become ruthless. Smith and Green (2007) assert that violent activities becoming ruthless and the perpetrators even more ruthless.
