ipl-logo

Similarities Between Adult And Juvenile Justice System

474 Words2 Pages

There are many significant differences between Adult and juvenile justice systems. There are also a lot of similarities between both justice systems like they both get tried the same way depending on what crime they committed. As an examlpe, if a kid committed a murder they will get tried like an adult. Also in both cases, the accused has the right to a trial/hearing, the right to an attorney, and the right to call witnesses and cross-examine the prosecution witnesses. In both cases, There is also the right for the offender to avoid self-incrimination and have notice of the charges against them. Also in both of the cases ¨the guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.¨
The are significant differences between the Adult Justice system and the juvenile justice system. In the Adult Justice system, the adult gets the choice to be tried by a jury whereas, in the Juvenile Justice System, the juvenile does not the choice to get tried by a jury instead it is the judge's choice if the juvenile is guilty or not. altho, an Adult trial is an open hearing whereby a juvenile trial is a closed hearing the adult hearing is also open to the public while the juvenile´s hearing is closed to the public. Another difference between the …show more content…

Still, a juvenile hearing may be moved to their county of residence is different from the one where the offense was committed. In the Rule of Procedure, ¨The adult court rules of criminal procedure are observed in juvenile court the rule, of course, maybe more relaxed. Another is the Disposition v. sentence¨A convicted adult receives a sentence as the punishment, whereas the juveniles receive a disposition or outcome of their hearing.¨it is different because the adult could get the death sentence while if the juvenile did the same crime they would have gotten life in prison without the possibility of

Show More
Related
999 Words | 4 Pages

This is a much less adversarial system. This allows the court to remain relatively informal, with the aim of not isolating the juvenile form the legal proceedings, and allows them more involvement, making the accountable for their actions. In the case of Police v JM (2011) NSWChC 1, the key objective of the sentencing was rehabilitation. JM had breached the conditions of his parole when he was charged with aggravated break and enter resulting in the imposing of the most serious sentence available for juvenile offenders, a control order. To promote rehabilitation, a condition of his parole was rehabilitation for his alcohol abuse.

Read More
609 Words | 3 Pages

Juveniles should not be charged with crimes such as theft, assault, and trespassing. Juveniles should not be tried as adults for violent crimes that they commit. First, juveniles minds are not as developed as an adult mind. When they are in the moment

Read More
1878 Words | 8 Pages

The decision to try a juvenile as an adult varies drastically across the globe as each country or state has its own set of laws and principles regarding the approach taken to juveniles in the court system that differ from those of other countries (Juvenile Vs Adult). In countries like India and France, there are sometimes entirely separate courts (France’s being called Juvenile Assize) and certain amendments that allow for those aged 16-18 who have committed “heinous” offenses to be tried as adults (Singhl). Places such as Iran and the Middle East try everyone as though they are the same, so minors can receive equal trials and sentences as adults (Mostafaei). Considering there is a range of policy and court differences, and for the purposes

Read More
348 Words | 2 Pages

Discuss and describe the process in which juvenile cases can be transferred to adult courts. Transfers, waivers, and certifications are all a formal procedures of moving a juvenile to adult court for trial instead of allowing them to remain in juvenile court. By moving a juvenile to adult court, it is then possible for harsher punishments to be imposed, for just deserts and severe punishments for violent offenders, fairness in administering punishments suitable because of one’s actions, a deterrent to decrease juvenile violence, less leniency compared to the juvenile court system, and a way for juveniles to accept responsibility for their actions. The process of transferring juvenile cases to adult courts is done through several different

Read More
1857 Words | 8 Pages

Statutory exclusion dictates that some states have laws that automatically exclude certain offenses or age groups from juvenile court jurisdiction. For example, a state may have a law that requires all 16-year-olds charged with murder to be tried as adults. Reverse waiver occurs when a juvenile court judge decides that a case should be heard in adult court, but the defendant or the defense attorney disagrees and requests that the case be heard in juvenile court instead. Blended sentencing is the approach that allows the court to impose both juvenile and adult sanctions on a defendant. For example, a judge may sentence a juvenile offender to a period in a juvenile detention center, followed by a period of probation as an adult.

Read More
539 Words | 3 Pages

Juveniles take up a large percentage of prisons in the U.S. every year with some having long adult sentences. According to njjn.org 250,000 juniors under the age of 18 are charged in an adult court and sentenced to prison with an adult sentence. Many states still allow kids as young as ten to be tried in an adult court with a jury rather than be in a juvenile court without one. Adult prison sentences are too harsh for juveniles. There are many different crimes that can put a junior in an adult court.

Read More
363 Words | 2 Pages

There are many children who recommit the crime after they are released from juvenile detention, and the ones released from jail are less likely to the crimes they did before. If the children are tried in adult court they are more likely to be sentenced to periods of incarceration. If a child is tried in adult court or in criminal court depends on what the crime was and how old the person offending was. The children who commit serious that aren’t tried in criminal court often reoffend and end up back where they were

Read More
515 Words | 3 Pages

Juvenile Justice Essay In the United States, there have been many cases where a juvenile would be found guilty and be tried as an adult. There are other cases where those juveniles are tried as adult forever. I am against charging juveniles as adults when they commit violent crimes, the juveniles lose many educational opportunities and the adult system is far too dangerous for the young juveniles. Juveniles are also young kids but only the fact that they do not get the same amount of education or experience that other teens gain.

Read More
344 Words | 2 Pages

When kids that are only 16 and 17 are tried in adult court, studies have shown that these teens are more likely to commit crimes and serious offenses. For this reason some kids get into a cycle of trials, Juvy, and release because that is all they know how to do, because when they are released they don’t know how to live a normal life.

Read More
964 Words | 4 Pages

The criminal justice system was created in order to punish people who choose to break the law. Some people believe they are above the law and decided to do whatever they like regardless of the consequences. Children and adults are both responsible for the actions they commit. The criminal justice should tried children as adults for committing felonies because a crime is a crime regardless of the age of the individual. This can be fulfilled by punishing juvelives with the correct sentence, by seeing that they know their actions lead to consequence and they have the proper process for a teen to be tried as adult.

Read More
1979 Words | 8 Pages

There are five ways in which a juvenile can be prosecuted in adult court. One way is through a judicial wavier, this is allowed in most states, where judges have the discretion to have a youth’s case tried in the adult criminal court. The second way is through statutory exclusion, twenty-nine states automatically require a juveniles’ case to be tried in the adult court based on the age of the youth and/or the alleged crime. The other three ways are allowed in fewer states and include direct file or “prosecutorial discretion” where juvenile court judges the decision to have a youth 's case tried in the adult criminal court. There also mandatory waivers in few states which require juvenile court judges to automatically transfer a youth 's case to adult criminal court for certain offenses or because of the age or prior record of the offender.

Read More
1058 Words | 5 Pages

When children and teens commit a violent crime such as murder, courts convict them as adults. This means that children as young as eight have been tried as adults in court. Eventually, these convicts will be housed in jails with adults. Despite the federal law stating that juvenile and adult inmates must be separated, most states do not comply with these rules. Furthermore, a law that varies throughout the states is the age in which courts send the children to adult or juvenile prisons.

Read More
1291 Words | 6 Pages

In our society, crimes are being committed not only by adults but by juveniles as well. By law as soon as a person turns 18 they are considered to be an adult. So what if an adult and a juvenile were to commit the same crime yet were sentenced differently simply based on the fact that one is a child and one is an adult? Juveniles are committing violent crimes just as adults and should be given the equal treatment and sentencing as adults receive. Juveniles aren’t completely ignorant as everyone seems to think.

Read More
964 Words | 4 Pages

Juvenile Justice Should juveniles get treated as adults that’s one of the biggest controversy in our nation now days, with many juveniles committing crimes that are inconceivable according to their age. Judges have the last word on how to treat this young people. Many people argue that “the teens that are under eighteen are only kids, they won’t count them as young adults, not until they commit crimes. And the bigger the crime, the more eager this people are to call them adults” (Lundstrom 87). This is why people can’t come to a decision as how these young people should be treated like.

Read More
760 Words | 4 Pages

They say this because if the juvenile courts are accommodating than the minors may not understand the severity of their actions opposed to if they were to be put through a one-size-fits-all method that they may respond better. However, if minors are tried in juvenile court it may be more effective. They should do this because there they can be given methods of rehabilitation that may help them. In conclusion, juveniles should not be treated the same as adults when it comes to committing crimes so that they have a better chance to rehabilitate. Minors should not be treated the same as adults when it comes to committing crimes.

Read More

More about Similarities Between Adult And Juvenile Justice System

Related Topics

Open Document