More handpicked essays just for you.
Similarity and difference ancient china and india
Similarity and difference ancient china and india
Similarity and difference ancient china and india
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Classical Athens and Han China are different from each other by its size and scope, the types of government, and how philosophers influence their societies. Athens was located in modern-day Greece next to the Mediterranean Sea. China was located in East Asia next to the Pacific Ocean. One factor that distinguishes Athens and Han China are their size and population.
Andrea Gavin Mrs. Fox History Oct 06, 2017 Fall of Classical Empires The Han dynasty and the Western Roman empire have many reasons of why they fell. Powerful and strong these empires were, but just like any other empire they had their similarities and differences, that caused their fall. One of their similarities was invasions by barbarian tribes.
Introduction The governments of Han China and Rome after Augustus were vastly different in their institutions and practices. While both empires employed autocratic rule and relied on bureaucracy, the ways in which they developed these systems varied significantly. The Han Chinese imperial government was characterized by a Confucian meritocracy while the Roman imperial government was characterized by a strong religious framework. Additionally, Han China tended to centralize more power within a single ruler as compared to Rome's system of devolved authority through provincial governorships.
Athens, Rome, Han China, and Ancient Egypt all have similar and different geography, history and government. First in Athens they had a Direct democracy. In Athens they picked 500 men to come together and vote. In Rome they had a Republic. Because they had so much land each section had to have their citizens vote for a representative.
Politically, both governments were corrupt. Not always in the same ways, but in the ways that they were similar, it was bloody and dark. In the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire, political figures were power hungry and ruthless to get what they wanted. In the Roman Empire, General Marius was elected consul 7 times in a row. General Marius was a valuable general but not a noble politician.
Comparing the Han Dynasty and Roman Empire The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire in the Classical Period were similar in their downfall and advances, but differed politically. The Roman Empire gradually fell for many different reasons. In the same way, the downfall of the Han Dynasty was caused by a multitude of factors, many of these being the same as the Roman’s. Just as the Roman Empire was hurt by the number of nomadic invasions, so was the Han.
The Sui and Tang dynasties took over as some of the most glorious periods in Chinese history. Rome was supplementary more disruptive than the collapse of Hna China. Due to Rome being incredibly drastic, the civilization left only the memory of the greatest in Western tradition. Another difference arises from the base of the civilizations collapsing. Rome was “human symptom” based; on the tombstones of Roman citizens were phrases suggesting the spread of downfall and defeat that provided a despondency of the afterlife (contributing to the decay of religion mentioned in the previous paragraph).
Political integration between both empires had both similarities and differences, most notably being different with the ways they chose those to rule. In Imperial Rome, bureaucracy relied on local elites (landholders) and the middle-class citizens to control provinces. Imperial Rome was far less complex, compared to the bureaucracy of Han China. Many official positions within the government were bought or became hereditary through family wealth as opposed to earned by merit, due to this fact, the Roman bureaucracy often suffered from poor governance. One of the reasons the empire was so unified even
Jon Krakauer’s Into Thin Air Albert Einstein once proclaimed, “ Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better.” Einstein, in this quote, was saying that all types of nature, whether it be human or physical, require profound examination to have the ability to recognize the nature of ourselves as people. The modest yet extraordinary statement perfectly illustrates Jon Krakauer’s non-fiction novel Into Thin Air. The book is a personal account of his journey climbing Mount Everest and the tragic events that occurred along with it. Into Thin Air not only brought awareness to the issues involving the Earth and it’s air quality, but also created an outlet for writers to use real life events as symbols for significant lessons.
The Roman, Chinese and Indian empire are the three main empires that exist in the past and inspired the rest of the empires that came afterwards. The Roman empire used trade and government to get where it was. The Chinese empire used legalism and a strong army. The Indian empire used religion to be successful. An empire consists of many different features, but there are some specific key features that makes an empire a strong and powerful empire and it usually consist of a strong military, effective leader, religion, trade and a lot more different features.
Han China and Mauryan India had many similarities. They were both bureaucracies, they both had emperors, and both empires established their laws on religious belief. They also had a lot of contrasting ideas for positioning their people, and they had contrasting ideas for their different religious standpoints. One empire put more weight on logic, and the other more on religion.
The fall of Rome was mainly because of plagues wiping out most of the population. The fall of the Han dynasty began from decentralized rule. However, outside invasions had an effect on the fall of both classical civilizations. Series of plagues began to hit the Rome Empire by the 2nd century. These plagues lowered the population drastically.
Australia and China are two very different countries with an almost polar opposite government structure, political systems and values. Australia is a constitutional monarchy whereas China is a single communist party state. It is arguable as to which system of government is more effective, considering it is involves other factors like social freedom, the quality of life and the economy. But comparing hand in hand, Australia’s system of government has proven to be more effective in all of these areas. Australia and China have many similarities yet differ greatly in political structure.
For instance, them two had sorted out governments yet Egypt 's was a Theocracy and China 's was a Monarchy. Social pecking order varied between the two, too. In Egypt, the Pharaoh was the sun and stars over the entire of Egypt, he was accepted to be a resurrection of God. In china be that as it may, home and family were at the focal point of life. The two both assembled incredible structures, yet the Egyptians made Pyramids while the Chinese constructed the Great Wall of China.
China traded silk and bronze work. Egypt traded jewels, cotton, gold, chickens and ivory. There were several other characteristics that China and Egypt had in common. Both Egypt and China worshipped many nature gods. Both believed in an afterlife.
