Constitutional Monarchy- The Glorious Revolution of 1688- 1989 Began a new era of politics between England and its American colonies. In England the Queen and King ruled it as a constitutional monarchs, they promoted and empire based on commerce. Also it was a monarchy that was limited in its rue by a constitution. 5. South Atlantic System-
During the early and late 15th century Spain was at a high point. Spain was the central power in Europe during that time and Spain was united under his father and mother,. Philip II reign began Spain's golden age. However, Philip II rule was not entirely beneficial for Spain. He injured Spain through heavy taxation and he caused the Netherlands to revolt impact on therefore he had a negative on Spain.
During the 16th and 17th centuries, absolutism was at the height of its popularity. Monarchs ruled over their countries with total authority. They claimed their spots on the throne by divine right and kept their power by limiting the nobilities’ influence. Spain was ruled by their own monarch, King Philip II. Under his rule, Spain became one of the richest nations in Europe.
Immediately, when I have begun to live here, I could see the big differences between that’s countries. And I could note, compare, and contrast. For example, Life style before in Cuba was full of short comings, specially, for the young people. There are not some opportunities for then, even if they were graduated from college, it’s hard to face life in that corrupted, and destroyed society, in contrast, now in Miami, young people have a great opportunity
France and the U.S. have many differences and similarities. Much of their similarities are how the countries run their government and the history of both their countries. While France have many cultural differences. Some similarities between France and the U.S. are their history.
He oversaw the reorganization of the administration and financial domain. Louis also planted a stronger foundation for manufacturing and trading. Many European nations idolized absolutism from the rule of King Louis XIV and such nations tended to imitate the monarchy. Constitutional monarchy in contrast had some of its own breakthroughs in seventeenth and eighteenth century Europe. Constitutionalism obtained traction as a separate counterpart to the uncontrolled absolutism in Europe.
They must have money, their people's loyalty, and all the power centralized in them. In France, the monarchs were able to do all of those things. However, In England, the monarchs could not. In England, mistakes made by previous kings kept future ones from controlling the nobles or collecting money, while in France the monarchs were able to both control the nobles,
The monarch could obtain what they wanted by building an army. All of the soldiers were loyal to the king, and the king only giving him all the power of his army. The soldiers all got uniforms and rankings which made the army go from 100 000 men to 400 000. Majority of the citizens were religious, so when their king claimed to be sent down by god; he gained even more power and authority.
Their national food is different from each other.
Therefore, the kingdom could not control if they were getting a good ruler or not. On the other hand, some monarchs did create some positive changes like improving culture and education for their people or trying to improve their living conditions. Monarch’s controlled religious choice . Many monarchs, believing their power came from god, decided what their people’s religious beliefs would be.
The monarchs that aided in
Or that they both require an individual to be eighteen years of age or older to vote. Both countries citizens hold the freedom of speech right. Though there are some similarities, there are many differences. Did you know Finland has a prime minister, but the United States doesn’t? Finland's prime minister’s name is Juha Sipilä.
Learning more about these governments may help give a better idea of if they truly are effective in their efforts. The first thing I focused on was the type of government and its leaders. Throughout my research, I found very few differences between the two countries. I learned that both countries are federal republics and have their own presidents and vice presidents.
France became decentralized state and the nobility with their titles became powerful and the authority of the king became less effective. The powerful noblemen were constantly challenging the authority of the king. This form of government was established in the early 16th century when Louis the XII was in charge because The French kings constantly trying to restore their royal powers from their nobles and this was very important process to make France a centralized state. When Louis the XII’s son took over power.
During the Renaissance, England was being ruled by King with a parliament which partially limited his power. However, other European countries also had been ruled by monarchy and they were also at war with their neighboring countries. Many countries at this time were exploring and discovering new land, bringing
