Differences And Similarities Between Absolutism And A Constitutional Monarchy

504 Words3 Pages

A monarchy is an arrangement of government in which the monarch, who is a single person, is the head of a state. Some monarchs are involved in government, but also are limited by a constitution. In an absolute monarchy, the monarch has all of the power in the state and is not limited to any structural form of constitution. On the other hand, a constitutional monarchy is limited by a constitution within the state. There are several differences connecting absolute and constitutional monarchy. Firstly, in a constitutional monarchy, the monarch does not have the power to create laws. In the difference, absolute monarchy allows the monarch to create laws and not be restricted. Secondly, in a constitutional monarchy, the monarch is typically not involved in the government constantly, but can elect a …show more content…

Charles I stated to parliament that he would not ease the restrictions on religion, yet used his absolute power to secretly marry the French princess. The absolute monarchy flourished under the rule of King Louis XIV. King Louis believed in a strong and centralized state, and ruled strongly from 1643-1715. Louis answered “ to no one but God” and swore to defend the Catholic religion. Since King Louis was an absolute monarch, he ruled without restriction. He oversaw the reorganization of the administration and financial domain. Louis also planted a stronger foundation for manufacturing and trading. Many European nations idolized absolutism from the rule of King Louis XIV and such nations tended to imitate the monarchy. Constitutional monarchy in contrast had some of its own breakthroughs in seventeenth and eighteenth century Europe. Constitutionalism obtained traction as a separate counterpart to the uncontrolled absolutism in Europe. The Glorious Revolution (1688-1689) took place in