ipl-logo

Similarities Between Federalist And Anti-Federalists

738 Words3 Pages

There is a quote from Aristotle that reads that if “Democracy arose from man's thinking that if they are equal in any respect then they are equal absolutely”. When dealing with making contrasts between Federalist and Anti-Federalist writers this quote often comes to mind. Primarily due to the fact that what constitutes as a good and proper representation for the society of the American people is a key element honed in on by both Federalist and Anti-Federalists. How do we justly elect representatives for the American people? What kind of systems do we need to have put in place to allow for them to be elected? Moreover, who do we turn to within the society to carry out the roles of these positions if all men are created equal? Within this essay …show more content…

Our first school of thought is one held by Madison, a Federalist, who believes that of the entirety of the American population that the most virtuous people can be found within the natural aristocracy. As they would be able to look at civic issues on a more national scale compared to that of the average citizen. Madison ironically notes in Federalist Paper No. 10 the dangers of factionalism can bring to the political world despite advocating for a minority to represent the majority. He states that “As long as the reason of man continues fallible, and he is at liberty to exercise it, different opinions will be formed”. So in order to address this issue he states that you can either try to control the cause or the effect of factions. Ultimately deciding that controlling effect is the better of the two options as “Liberty is to faction what air is to fire, an aliment without which it instantly expires”. While he may be promoting the …show more content…

A man that believes that real and true civic virtue cannot lie within the natural aristocracy, but within the average working citizen. Men that are farmers, blacksmiths, and dock workers. In order for a true mirror of society to be found with the house of representatives these are the kinds of men that will best understand the American people. In Federal Farmer Letter 7 he takes on Madison's idea of how he imagines the house. Noting that he does not want a small assembly on the basis that the larger the more accurate or representative the house will be. He backs his reasoning with a manner somewhat similar to Madison as he fears the concept of factions as well but in this instance the faction formed by the aristocracy, stating that “combinations founded in the connections of offices and private interests, both evils which are increased in proportion as the number of men, among which the elected must be, are decreased”. A sentiment that I believe to be a direct shot at Madison's concept that with a smaller assembly you have less to worry about in the realm of corruption from a statistical standpoint. A point made more ironic by the fact that Madison purposely wants factions to be large to keep them un-unified as a means to prevent oppression while actively trying to keep his faction of natural aristocratic house members small to get what they

Show More
Related

Summary Of The Federalist No. 10 1787

701 Words | 3 Pages

In a genuine democracy, a minority group gives limited risk since it can be effortlessly outvoted and abolished. A larger greater number of faction, as Madison states, “the form of popular government, on the other hand, enables it to sacrifice to its ruling passion or interest both the public good and the rights of other citizens.” (James Madison. Federalist No.10 1787.)

Read More

Similarities Between Antifederalist And Federalists

127 Words | 1 Pages

The argument between the Federalists and the Antifederalists principally centre on the Artivles of Confederation-Consitution. The Federalists and the Antifederalists have thier interpretions wheather the fedel government necessarliy exits or not. The Federalists believe that the relationship between fedel government and fifty states governments is stable and helpful. In contrast, the Antifederalists oppose this political struture and democratic goals, so that they think that the exitence of fedel government suppose to get corrupt. On the other hand, the Federalists and the Antifederalists also have different views about slaveries.

Read More

Similarities Between Federalist 10 And 51

857 Words | 4 Pages

Madison first defines the “violence of faction” as he explains that governments often make decisions by the “superior force of an interested and overbearing majority” instead of according to the “rules of justice.” In framing this situation, he explains the issue that majority factions or parties in governments have, in the past, had the ability to rule without consideration of minority parties. Outlining possible solutions for this problem, Madison continues to explain that the causes of parties cannot be removed without destroying people’s freedom to make their own choices. This destruction would counter Madison’s purpose of removing factions in the first place, as it would inhibit people’s liberty. Using this logic, Madison asserts an inevitability to the formation of parties and thus concludes that the government must instead control their effects by either preventing “the same passion or interest in a majority” or controlling the “number and local situation” of the majority.

Read More

Differences And Similarities Between Federalist And Anti Federalists

318 Words | 2 Pages

United under the articles of confederation federalist and anti federalist strongly believed in liberty and freedom but there were more differences than similarities for example, Federalist and anti federalist had very different ideas on how the new nation of America should have run. federalist wanted a strong central government to fix the weak system of the Articles Of The Confederation and strengthen the nation as a whole, while anti federalist wanted a weak central government, so they could continue to have the power that made up their economy and regulations in each state. During the Revolutionary the founding fathers need to show the people and other nations that they were prepared to fight for America's freedom in a orderly and

Read More

Class Warfare That Will Shape Election 2014 By Joel Kotkin

708 Words | 3 Pages

In the short passage the lower income individuals or families were divided by kotkin believing that, the top one percent were trying to win two certain sections and those were the yeomanry and the clerisy. The yeomanry and clerisy are both similar and different and they are similar because they can change the political view and they are different because a yeomanry is defined as they are middle class property owners and a clerisy are university professors and government officials but those of these statements written in the passage were thought of by kotkin himself. I believe that everything that the author is trying to say is based on opinion but he backs up some of his claims with logical reasoning which can really change other individual’s minds. .For example, “he states that in 2012, nearly 96% of donations from Ivy League employees went to the presidential campaign”.

Read More

Differences And Similarities Between Anti-Federalists And Anti-Federalists

622 Words | 3 Pages

Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists Federalists were mostly merchants, bankers manufacturers, and wealthy farm owners. They basically owned land or some type of property and were well-educated. Most of these people lived in urban areas. Anti-Federalists were mostly artisans, shopkeepers, frontier settlers, and poor farmers. They were mostly uneducated and illiterate and most of them lived in rural areas.

Read More

Federalist 10 Pros And Cons

968 Words | 4 Pages

In the context of the time, virtuous people by definition did not act out of their own interests, as they already owned property, thus had no reason to manipulate the government. Thus, these candidates would, with little doubt, would work to ensure there was a great degree of political equality in the

Read More

Similarities Between Federalist And Anti-Federalists

386 Words | 2 Pages

Before I state my opinion, I must lay out the two opposing sides between the federalists and the anti Federalists. To put it simply, federalists were people who supported the ratification of the constitution. 
On the other side of the spectrum the anti-Federalists were people who opposed the ratification of the constitution. If I was living in the in the 1780’s I probably would have voted and supported the ratification of the constitution. I am the type of person that wants a strong and unified central government.

Read More

Ratification Dbq Essay

1265 Words | 6 Pages

Essentially, meaning that factions would naturally develop as men have differing opinions regarding such things as religion, politics, and attachment to different political leaders. However, Madison states that the most common source of factions was the unequal distribution of property. It is through this issue that Madison first raises the best way at limiting faction, starting with the flaws of a “pure democracy” (Johnson,

Read More

How Did Jefferson And Hamilton Influence The Bill Of Rights

1113 Words | 5 Pages

Through the fundamental ideals of the founding fathers the United States government has been sculpted into a variation of a democracy influenced by Madison, Jefferson, and Hamilton. These men each provided concepts and qualities of their respective government that are directly reflected in the constitution and the bill of rights. Although, conflicting principals can be identified through each individual’s interpretation of a democracy, there is no doubt Madison, Jefferson, and Hamilton structured our government into what it is today. Madison described a democracy in which wealth needed to be equally distributed among the people in order to function.

Read More

How The Articles Of Confederation Hindered The Central Government

843 Words | 4 Pages

That, in turn, preserves the liberty of the people from overbearing

Read More

Similarities Between Federalist And Anti-Federalists

277 Words | 2 Pages

This rivalry among the Federalists and Anti-Federalists signified a controversial democracy which focused upon the national government consuming an amount of authority they should accept. Alexander Hamilton represented the Federalists as Thomas Jefferson represented the Anti-Federalists who promptly announced themselves the Democratic-Republicans. The Democratic-Republicans solicited power towards the state government considering they "believe" in an egalitarian civilization that would develop to preserve the individuals' preferences. However, the Federalists suppose that the state governments were exceedingly constitutional since it would lead to unfairness towards the "elites" moreover critical for the economy. The Anti-Federalists believes

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Expansion Of Suffrage Dbq Essay

562 Words | 3 Pages

The expansion of suffrage was argued to be burdensome and unwise for the American government. In Document 2, Chief Justice of New York State’s highest court, James Kent, argued that the expansion of suffrage would mean that “ the indolent and the profligate would cast the whole burdens of society upon the industrious and the virtuous.” (Doc 2). Kent believed that the expansion of suffrage to the majority would result in them making uneducated decisions that would burden the rest of society. As described by Frances Trollope in Document 4, the officials of the American government seemed to be unqualified.

Read More

Revolutionary Characters: What Made The Founders Different By Gordon Wood

1179 Words | 5 Pages

Wood makes it very clear that the Founding Fathers were not born into wealth. Most of these men are born in the middle or low class, do not have much money, and many of them are of the first to go to college in their families. The Founders are not handed their roles on a plate, they have to do all of the work themselves. These men are very ambitious, and try to serve the nation for the greater good, rather than self-interests. This is not as common with the people in government of today’s

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Andrew Jackson

1269 Words | 6 Pages

The debate over the expansion of suffrage had supporters, the common people, who wanted to expand voting rights to them, and the opposers, the rich, who wanted to keep voting as a privilege for themselves. The working class took the pro side of the debate over expanding suffrage because they wanted the ability to vote and believed that balloting should be established on people’s thoughts rather than social status. For example, according to Nathan Stanford, a chairman of a committee that revised the state constitution, “the only qualifications [to vote] seem to be the virtue and morality of the people . . .those who contribute to the public support we consider as entitled to a share of the election of rulers”

Read More

More about Similarities Between Federalist And Anti-Federalists

Related Topics

Open Document