ipl-logo

Comparing Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx And Sir Thomas More

826 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Analysis of the communist manifesto

Thu Quach Joseph Foster Mosaics 2 14 December 2016 Karl Marx & Sir Thomas More Utopia and The Communist Manifesto are two different pieces of work with different perspectives regarding society, Marx and More share similar theories about ownership. Ownership is a tangible asset that a person has complete control and authority over. Marx’s approach towards ownership is more aggressive and demanding, whereas More 's approach is much more amicable. Utopia, written by More, discusses a man 's journey to a new society that is considered nearly perfect. Raphael Hythloday an acquaintance of more’s discussed his travels throughout various parts of the world, ultimately stumbling across a land called Utopia. While the discussion of Utopia …show more content…

If things are shared and people are given what they need to thrive on then the possible outcome can be such, as that of Utopia, but such development will take a lot of time and effort to achieve. When comparing Utopia to The Communist Manifesto it makes the nation of utopia seem unattainable. The two nations are basically opposite of one another. One nation is filled with people that work together to achieve a goal that seems impossible and the other nation take advantage of their people in anyway possible so they can live a better life. To other people that might compare the two nations, they might say that The Communist Manifesto is more realistic our time in a society where people usually take advantage of one another, even if that means stepping on them to obtain success, than a nation called utopia that contain many unrealistic laws and plans. Some of the laws in utopia might be attainable, but many of them are not because at the end of the day people are selfish and only think about themselves and not how their actions will affect everyone as a whole. Utopia is a society that doesn’t succeed by many individual owning different asset or tangible items, but it works because there are no fights amongst themselves due to the greed of wanting

Show More
Related
572 Words | 3 Pages

Rosalind Hursthouse has a very different opinion on abortion and does not relate it to the murder of children or the rights of women. Instead, she justifies it through what a virtuous person would do. In the case study with the Thompson’s, Hursthouse would relate it to the relevance of the familiar biological facts and how pregnancy is a known result of sexual intercourse. The fact that Linda’s fetus is four months old would not be of relevance in Hursthouse’s opinion as clear lines are not visible as to when the fetus is attached and developed. The main focus of Hursthouse would be to question whether the abortion would be a result of a person acting “virtuously or viciously or neither” (Hursthouse 474).

Read More
1239 Words | 5 Pages

“It was a pleasure to burn” (Bradbury, P.1)”. How can today’s society today be compared to this dystopian world? The book Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury is a prediction of what modern society would be like in the year 2081. In this society book are burned to limit information and to keep people from thinking. These people that burn books are called firemen.

Read More
1595 Words | 7 Pages

Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith and “Communist Manifesto” by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels both address selfishness and its effect on society through social and economic means. In Wealth of Nations, Smith defines wealth as the productivity of a nation and the aspects of a commercial society. “The Communist Manifesto” criticizes the idea behind a capitalist society and talks about the class struggle between the working class and the owners of the means of production. Wealth of Nations and “The Communist Manifesto” both analyze how the selfishness of people affects society, however while Wealth of Nations claims selfishness causes increased productivity and increases wages for all, “The Communist Manifesto” argues that selfishness causes injustice

Read More
1216 Words | 5 Pages

“Socialism” and “communism” was introduced into America’s political lingo when the reformers tried to own useful property together as a community instead of private individuals. Several Utopian societies attempted to change traditional gender roles and

Read More
1341 Words | 6 Pages

Every society strives to be perfect, but the truth is most cannot make the sacrifices necessary to achieve perfection. Every society contains too much conflict since different people's’ views and emotions are constantly clashing with each other. These conflicts are the reason why a utopian society cannot be created. In order to have a perfect society, everyone in that society has to have similar motives to eliminate conflicting ideals. Societies have to be willing to sacrifice certain traits, such as emotions and the truth to obtain perfection, but first, they must ask themselves, “is it really worth giving up these traits?”

Read More
1100 Words | 5 Pages

Nevertheless, this is exactly what occurred when Thomas Paine, a political writer during the American Revolution, examined what his utopian society would look like. While More was led to the conclusion that a more totalitarian government would be most beneficial to society, Paine declares that all

Read More
733 Words | 3 Pages

Communism builds on the idea that everyone is the same and should earn the same amount of money regardless of their profession. The most important with communism is that there should not be any class distinctions. China, Laos, Cuba and Vietnam

Read More
620 Words | 3 Pages

As you may know, utopia is an imagined community that has nearly perfect assets for its citizens. There are people who try to physically create utopian societies and end up failing. These communities fail for a few reasons: the idea of "utopia" is slightly different for each individual, poor economies, and disputes dividing the societies. Three of the most popular utopian societies are what I will be talking about and how they failed. Brook Farm was an experimental and agricultural community in West Roxbury, Massachusetts.

Read More
1502 Words | 7 Pages

Meanwhile, the theory of Communism was theoretically developed by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in 1848, with the writing of “The Communist Manifesto” (Heywood, Politics 41). Communism is a system in which all economics and politics are synthesized into one classless state which is most commonly associated with common ownership and people 's leadership by a political party. Although both ideologies coincide in a few aspects when in practice, Communism and Fascism feature different approaches to property and society. Similarities between Fascism and Communism First, under both despotic systems, the state controls the production system, industry, and trade.

Read More
105 Words | 1 Pages

One might argue that Spanno’s (2008) Real utopia: Participatory society for the 21st century is a stimulating collection of essays with contributions from fellow left libertarian activists such as Michael Albert, Robin Hahnel. It appears to explore the likelihood of an openly democratic and participatory society, which is based on egalitarianism, employees’ self –management, and social ownership as the mode of production. It appears to reject the directives of capitalist globalization to be replaced by centralized planning in collaboration with participatory planning. In essence, Wright’s (2010) real utopia as an e alternative to capitalism might be an egalitarian society based on self-management, justice, and harmony.

Read More
937 Words | 4 Pages

Karl Marx wrote his Communist Manifesto in 1848 and it was not until about 70 years later that the communist society he foretold about finally arose. Russia, in 1917, forced the Tsar to abdicate leading massive social upheaval and later that year the Bolshevik party took control and called themselves communists. As years went by in the communist country, it inspired China to join in on the communist regime. China mostly built off of what Russia did in order to become communist, but how much did Russia build off of the Communist Manifesto. Karl Marx wrote that the new society would rise as the lower class rose above the upper class, but Communist Russia came to be because of a new party forced its way into power.

Read More
1543 Words | 7 Pages

Andre Abi Haidar PSPA 210 INTRODUCTION It is always difficult to write about and discuss Karl Marx, or more importantly the applications of Marx’s theories, due to the fact that he inspired and gave rise to many movements and revolutionaries, not all of which follow his theories to the point. Although Marx tends to be equated with Communism, it might not seem righteous to blame him for whatever shortcomings occurred when his theories were put to the test; Marx passed away well before the revolution in Russia, and he played no role in the emergence of the totalitarian regime at the time. When discussing Marx, however, Vladimir Lenin is one of the biggest highlights when it comes to studying the outcomes of Marx’s theories.

Read More
1079 Words | 5 Pages

Foundations of Sociology (SOC10010) Mid-Term Essay: Question: ‘’Discuss three main ideas from the Communist Manifesto.’’ Answer: In this essay I have been asked to discuss three main ideas from the ‘’Communist Manifesto’’, written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. To do this I will summarise three main ideas from the text and critically analyse them.

Read More
879 Words | 4 Pages

Ergo, if we learn from the mistakes the Germans and Russians did regarding communism in Marx way it is possible. If we thoroughly follow Marx and Friedrich guide we can actually achieve

Read More
1781 Words | 8 Pages

This essay will compare and contrast the aspirations and opinions of the Marxist and feminist ideologies, both of which continue to have a meaningful impact upon modern politics. At its simplest Marxism is a political ideology which aims to build from the critical analysis of the philosopher Karl Marx. The Marxist view of capitalism is that through the operation of the economy, the masses (workers) are exploited by the ruling class (capitalists) via profit, which is seen as theft. A strong proponent of this stance was the philosopher Friedrich Engels who stated, “all past history was the history of class struggles; that these warring classes of society are always the products of the modes of production and of exchange.” (Engles, 1877), developed

Read More

More about Comparing Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx And Sir Thomas More

Related Topics

Open Document