ipl-logo

Similarities Between The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

687 Words3 Pages

Under the Articles of Confederation, the United States government was in shambles. Having left the rule of the British Crown, the States desired a government far from their previous predecessor. However, having given tremendous power to the states and very little to the federal, there was much chaos. A prime example of the failure of this document was Shay’s Rebellion, when farmers rebelled against government officials for debt that they could not repay due to faults in the Articles. Consequently, a new Constitution had to be ratified which resulted in many compromises between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. These two contrasting groups had differing opinions on issues regarding the power of national government, clauses, interpretations, and amendments which inevitably led to arrangements made in the now presently used Constitution. …show more content…

Primarily, individuals such as Andrew Hamilton and James Madison, Federalists, believed in a stronger central government whereas others such as Thomas Jefferson and Patrick Henry, Anti-Federalists, were for larger state government. Federalists were typically untrusting of citizens and the American people, and felt that the more educated individuals involved in government would govern. In contrast, individuals such as Henry and Jefferson believed that government was for the people, and should be given to the people to handle. In today’s standards, the Federalist views typically align with those of the Democratic platform while those with Anti-Federalist views align with those of the Republican

Show More
Related
206 Words | 1 Pages

Shays Rebellion served as the final nail in the coffin for the Articles of Confederation. Although the Articles of Confederation was America's first national document, it came with many weaknesses. One of the major weaknesses was that the federal government was too weak and therefore could not enforce laws. The Continental Congress borrowed money to fight in both the Revolutionary War and the French and Indian War therefore were in debt.

Read More
663 Words | 3 Pages

Each party present during the drafting of the Constitution had their own ideas about what it should accomplish. As a result, it was very difficult to formulate a document that appeased all groups and parties, who often voiced their opinions of how it should be written. The U.S. Constitution was the father of many worries concerning the rights of the people, the role of government, and the balance between the aristocrats and poor, the government and the people. The Federalists, or supporters of the Constitution, were not completely satisfied with the task they were given. They were supposed to revise the old Articles of Confederation, but they felt like it needed to be completely rewritten.

Read More
622 Words | 3 Pages

Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists Federalists were mostly merchants, bankers manufacturers, and wealthy farm owners. They basically owned land or some type of property and were well-educated. Most of these people lived in urban areas. Anti-Federalists were mostly artisans, shopkeepers, frontier settlers, and poor farmers. They were mostly uneducated and illiterate and most of them lived in rural areas.

Read More
1158 Words | 5 Pages

Thomas Jefferson- one of the great American founding fathers with exquisite taste in architecture and French wine, but also known to hold a controversial set of ideas- fought frequently and strongly against the Federalists ideas before he achieved Presidency. Jefferson and the other republican democrats who followed suit held the belief that the powers of the federal government should be left strictly to what is granted to them in the Constitution. Those powers not specifically addressed in the Constitution would then be delegated to the state governments. This is to ensure that the federal government did not have too much power as they believe a country runs best under a form of self-government.

Read More
258 Words | 2 Pages

A connection to this would be it to Thomas Jefferson to many he is a known Anti-Federalists and he disapproves of a strong central government and allowing the most frequent power that is more spread out towards the people and states. And Thomas Jefferson main reason for entering office is to limit the influence of the national government. So Jefferson so began to everything that the Federalists had established. In class, we analyzed which party did Jefferson lean toward comparing his acts as presidents and categorizing them as Federalist and Antifederalist actions. After categorizing these Jefferson’s contributions during his presidency it seemed as if he was leaning towards a Federalist view even though he strictly labeled himself as an Anti-Federalist.

Read More
386 Words | 2 Pages

Before I state my opinion, I must lay out the two opposing sides between the federalists and the anti Federalists. To put it simply, federalists were people who supported the ratification of the constitution. 
On the other side of the spectrum the anti-Federalists were people who opposed the ratification of the constitution. If I was living in the in the 1780’s I probably would have voted and supported the ratification of the constitution. I am the type of person that wants a strong and unified central government.

Read More
459 Words | 2 Pages

There were several differences that distinguished the two parties, including money matters, debt assumption, and foreign policy. Disagreements over the future of the nation under the new Constitution started with money

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

Following the Revolutionary War, America had just gained independance from Great Britain and needed to form a new government. The Articles of Confederation were established as an attempt to create a government that was unlike Britain’s. Unfortunately, the Articles of Confederation had several weaknesses. When in the process of repairing those weaknesses, the Federalists and the Anti-federalists formed. The Articles of Confederation were very weak as well as useless to America and because of this, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists could not agree on a new type of government.

Read More
926 Words | 4 Pages

The significance of Shays' Rebellion on the drafting of the United States Constitution may be observed in its impact on public opinion, role in influencing constitutional discussions, and potential to shape future public policy (CrashCourse, 2013). The lessons acquired through Shays' Rebellion acted as a wake-up call to the Founding Fathers, resulting in a stronger central government with greater authority to defend individual rights and liberties for all Americans. For example, one of the biggest flaws in the Article of Confederations was its inability to collect taxes, so the founding fathers found it necessary to create a document that would allow governments to raise funds to protect the interests of individuals (CrashCourse,

Read More
214 Words | 1 Pages

“Federalists vs Anti-Federalists” The title of the article is “The Antifederalists were right” it was written on Sept. 27, 2006 by Gary Galles. The article was about the reasons why antifederalists were right. The Federalists wanted a strong central government.

Read More
194 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalists and the Anti federalists have a lot of arguments, and that is why America can be developed and become to more powerful in the world. First of all, the Federalists are the people who support the present relationship between the federal government and governments of the fifty states, which came into effect with the ratification of the US Constitution in 1787. On the other hand, the Anti federalists are those who oppose the current political structure. The tussle between these two groups can be traced back to the 18th century, when the committee which met to revise the Articles of Confederation concluded that its revision was not feasible and the entire constitution had to be rewritten. The Civil War was a fight to preserve the

Read More
1637 Words | 7 Pages

Both the federalists and the anti-federalists had much to say in regards to the executive office. While it is comforting that they found common ground in regards to the electoral college being an excellent mode of electing the executive, they disagreed fundamentally in the design of the executive. For the purpose of this paper, I will first discuss the Federalists arguments for the executive and the types of power the executive needs to possess. I will then discuss the Anti-Federalists disagreements towards the Federalists claims. I will then conclude with whom I think has the most convincing argument and why.

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

The federalists and antifederalists disagreed about whether the Constitution should be ratified.

Read More
443 Words | 2 Pages

On page 185 there is a chart of Jefferson's and Hamilton's ideas. Jefferson and other Federalists believed in a strong central government, a government run by the elite, and a loose interpretation of the Constitution. On the other hand, Hamilton and the anti-federalists believed in a small national government, the sharing of power between federal and state governments, an inclusive democracy, and a strict interpretation of the constitution.

Read More
895 Words | 4 Pages

Federalist and Anti-Federalists One of the biggest debates in American history was the debate between Federalist and Anti-Federalists involving the Constitution. In 1787, men of power, politics, and governing backgrounds arrived in Philadelphia to discuss the government structure and ratifications to the constitution, among various issues. The men were split among groups of Federalists and Anti-Federalists. These were two very diverse groups of people who shared opposing viewpoints while arguing over the ratifications of the constitution. Federalist and Anti-Federalist shared different dynamics and opinions, due to their knowledge and backgrounds of the world around them.

Read More

More about Similarities Between The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

Open Document