Antifederalist And Federalists Dbq

Federalists and Antifederalists When the Constitution was written in 1787 and submitted to the states for ratification, it set off months of fierce debate. There were many people who agreed with ratifying the Constitution and welcomed it as a stronger and more effective federal government that could successfully unite the 13 states together into one nation. These people were known as federalists. But others opposed ratifying the Constitution because they were afraid the proposed federal government was too powerful and wouldn’t protect the rights of the people. These people were known as antifederalists. The federalists and antifederalists disagreed about whether the Constitution should be ratified.

Federalists were people who opposed the idea of the articles of confederation and wanted to push for ratification . Why you might ask it was because the document had no central government to back their laws up so that meant no military could be formed to get rid of retaliation. Many federalists such as John Jay were able to push for ratification using retaliation and bringing people together. Federalists' point was to push for needs to get matched and people to be free. In document 1 a farmer named John Jay during the late 1780’s expressed his feelings of the government and what he felt other foreign governments might think if they were able to push and create a well put together compound of a government. In the statement (doc1) "If [foreign nations] see that our national government is efficient and well administered…our militia properly organized and disciplined, our resources and finances managed, our credit re-established, our people free, [happy], and

antifederalists were groups of people who wanted nothing to do with ratification of a new government. Antifederalists were the people who most likely owned slaves; the reason for this was because of the constitutional convention that created a law that doesn't count all the slaves, meaning less representatives for larger states. Antifederalists have thought during the period of time where they were at large that because of ratification Great Britain will seem to appear again because strict laws where all Britain did and with ratification laws can be created and that gives worries militaries can be at large and taxes could strike. In documents around the united states many antifederalists wrote letters of what they think will happen in the future of the government if ratification succeeds. There were as well as many people who hid their name after saying many things. A document by brutus 1 who was later found out to be Robert Yates wrote about how if the government expands the simple needs of humans can not be expressed or viewed this is expressed in his writing “If the thirteen United States should be reduced to one great republic, governed by one legislature, and under the direction of one executive and judicial…In a republic of such vast extent as the United–States,