ipl-logo

Single-Member Districts With Plurality Voting System

1334 Words6 Pages

An Electoral System (With Single-member Districts with Plurality Voting Rule) is for the Better
The plurality voting rule that is structured with a single-member district highly favors the two-party systems. The system involves voters in a single member casting a vote for only one candidate. The candidate who garners the most votes wins the election. This system has advantages and disadvantages. This system should be retained.
All the voters in one district tend to cast one vote for their candidate. The geographically defined regions form districts which send one representative to the legislature. The design tends to make it hard for new parties to enter and compete. This aspect should be maintained. The aspect is characterized by a synthesis …show more content…

The single-member plurality voting system is beneficial as it creates a strong local representation for the districts as each representative speak and forwards the interest of the people in their specific districts. This also benefits the districts with better services since they have an easily identifiable representative. The system is supported by its ability to reinforce one party government in the legislature as well as a two party system leading to more efficient government and greater accountability. The aspect of having a single representative means they can be held to account and be re-elected or not depending on their performance. The system is also suitable for ensuring geographical representation. The division into various districts ensures each region is recognized and given a chance to participate in the electoral system. The regions also get a representation to the legislature who stands for and fights for the people, their interest and …show more content…

The two parties mostly forward two candidates who face each other where one is elected. This aspect tends to substantially limit the choice of the voters for variety which is disadvantageous. It is impossible for one party to adequately tackle all the interests of the different segments of voters. The system also ignores alternative choices as two sides that seek unity fail to acknowledge alternative options. The winner takes all mechanism makes the losing party lose all relevance despite their significant following. Their interests and opinions are also ignored and shelved. It is also criticized on the grounds that a single person cannot adequately tackle all the opinions and interests of an entire

More about Single-Member Districts With Plurality Voting System

Open Document